Further comparative pictures of the SD43 with 116600, 116610, 116660

[coleburns]

Originally Posted by 00Seven

Great comparison pics...looks like the SD50 compares most closely in size to the Sub-C.

I was thinking the same thing but his review states otherwise

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by coleburns

I was thinking the same thing but his review states otherwise

Its so subjective and in pictures you'll never get a true comparison. The only way you really will know is by trying them on.

IMO SD43 really does meet that "in between" size that I think Rolex was aiming for.

[sensui]

Originally Posted by brandrea

Its so subjective and in pictures you'll never get a true comparison. The only way you really will know is by trying them on.

IMO SD43 really does meet that "in between" size that I think Rolex was aiming for.

Yep it's really subjective (since we all have different wrist sizes and shapes), I tend to agree with Tampashooter's review after trying on the SD43 myself also. Great watch, but there's no mistakening for me the way it wears both visually and feeling on the wrist is very close to a deep sea.

[Vaxe]

Thanks for sharing!

[PanosI]

Great pics of great watches ! Thanks for sharing

[KrismanX]

Outstanding shots! Thanks for the share. This is an awesome collection

[xlarge]

Nice collection.

[Tampashooter]

Originally Posted by coleburns

out of interest, what camera do you use?

Hey amigo

I use a Nikon D20. But all of these were taken with the freaking iPhone 7. 2x portrait setting. With the right light, it's amazing what you can do on a smart phone now. It's 12 megapixels!

[Tampashooter]

Originally Posted by brandrea

Its so subjective and in pictures you'll never get a true comparison. The only way you really will know is by trying them on.

IMO SD43 really does meet that "in between" size that I think Rolex was aiming for.

I really do like it. But.....and again, this is subjective. If I blindfolded you, and told you it was the sub, you'd say no. If I told you it was the deep sea, you'd have to think about it a while.

[Tampashooter]

Originally Posted by 00Seven

Great comparison pics...looks like the SD50 compares most closely in size to the Sub-C.

Perhaps straight on. But like the sd4k, its got that big booty underneath.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by Tampashooter

I really do like it. But.....and again, this is subjective. If I blindfolded you, and told you it was the sub, you'd say no. If I told you it was the deep sea, you'd have to think about it a while.

I see your point

[Tampashooter]

Originally Posted by brandrea

I see your point

You mean, you deep SEA my point!

[Rodrigo082]

Great collection - thank you so much for taking the time!
I'm in love with the Deepsea Blue - it looks amazing!!!

[ttomczak]

Very nice line up!

[Steve36Efc]

Originally Posted by Tampashooter

Yep, been down that road many days. It wouldn't shock me at some point if I tire of it and move all but a few. I have diversity with other brands, but the rolex thing is a bit out of control.

Stunning line up

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by sensui

Great watch, but there's no mistakening for me the way it wears both visually and feeling on the wrist is very close to a deep sea.

My impressions exactly.

[Pmt2]

Originally Posted by Tampashooter

Perhaps straight on. But like the sd4k, its got that big booty underneath.

Which is your favorite?

[Tampashooter]

Originally Posted by Pmt2

Which is your favorite?

The SD4K. Without question.

[Gharddog03]

Solid line up!!

[FTX I]

Awesome

[GiantRobot]

Beautiful collection!

[gtnator]

Great pictures. The DSSD does actually look larger in your picture.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[casadecamporolex]

Thanks for sharing your collection.

[RolexguyinSF]

One of the most beautiful Rolex collections I've ever seen. Truly incredible.