ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Mrdi · 12 May 2006, 10:54 AM

Is this a redial by Rolex, or original?

Clifton · 12 May 2006, 11:10 AM

Hard to tell for sure, but sure looks like an original red dial to me.

dman · 12 May 2006, 11:31 AM

First look I would say legit, but hard to tell in pics.

mailman · 12 May 2006, 11:52 AM

Is a re-dial one that has had the original letters and hr markers painted over to make them look good again?

JJ Irani · 12 May 2006, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mailman

Is a re-dial one that has had the original letters and hr markers painted over to make them look good again?

Now what kind of a tossed-up reply was that, ya Italian tosser?

padi56 · 12 May 2006, 10:30 PM

The first Series of Red Submariner produced from 1969 had the depth rating written as 200m/660ft.Changed around 73 to the 660ft/200m so watch is 1973 onward dial looks fine to me,but hard so say for 100% from picture.Serial check with Rolex to be 100% sure.

12 May 2006, 10:42 PM

No flat 'S' so it must be genuine, since all fake Subs have a flat 'S'.

JJ Irani · 13 May 2006, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atomic

No flat 'S' so it must be genuine, since all fake Subs have a flat 'S'.

When was the last time you had your eyes checked, tosser??!!

That one above is FLAT "S" just like this one...

Prince · 13 May 2006, 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

...That one above is FLAT "S" just like this one...

Well... Flat-ish!

maverick · 13 May 2006, 10:00 AM

What exactly do yo mean by "re-dial?" Is the a NOS dial? Here is a close-up of mine. I thought pre 1972 were open 6s and post 1972 were closed 6s. =) maverick

12 May 2006, 10:54 AM	#1
Mrdi Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Posts: 3,478	re dial Is this a redial by Rolex, or original?

12 May 2006, 11:31 AM	#3
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,585	First look I would say legit, but hard to tell in pics. __________________ You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo.

12 May 2006, 11:52 AM	#4
mailman TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: . Watch: 126610LN Posts: 35,510	Is a re-dial one that has had the original letters and hr markers painted over to make them look good again? __________________ JJ

12 May 2006, 10:30 PM	#6
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 53,062	The first Series of Red Submariner produced from 1969 had the depth rating written as 200m/660ft.Changed around 73 to the 660ft/200m so watch is 1973 onward dial looks fine to me,but hard so say for 100% from picture.Serial check with Rolex to be 100% sure. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

13 May 2006, 10:00 AM	#10
maverick Banned Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: maverick Location: Prescott Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,180	Close-up What exactly do yo mean by "re-dial?" Is the a NOS dial? Here is a close-up of mine. I thought pre 1972 were open 6s and post 1972 were closed 6s. =) maverick

12 May 2006, 11:10 AM	#2
Clifton Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Earth Posts: 148	Hard to tell for sure, but sure looks like an original red dial to me.

12 May 2006, 10:42 PM	#7
Atomic Guest Posts: n/a	No flat 'S' so it must be genuine, since all fake Subs have a flat 'S'.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)