The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 November 2017, 01:19 AM   #1
WatchObsess
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Rio de jeneiro
Posts: 211
Ceramic vs carbotech

Would you rather own full ceramic (case and bracelet) Pam 438?

Ceramic Pam 441?

Or Carbotech Pam 661?

My birthday is end of November and I am already planning a gift for 2018 lol. Just bought a 511 so no more watch for a year as per an agreement with the wifey !

Anyway, I am leaning towards those three but am a bit concerned on the versatility of a full black watch. I really like the "Tuttonero" but wonder in the long run if the black on black, on black,might be too much with not enough pop and contrast. After all I am used to SS the most.

So which one and why? Or is it better to stick with titanium and steel? Currently I only have a Pam 511 that I will NEVER sell as I am at last REALLY content with this one. My goal is to have a two watch collection.

Thanks for reading,



Sent from my A1601 using Tapatalk
WatchObsess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 06:50 AM   #2
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Both have theirs pros and cons. Ceramic will never scratch, but can break. Carbotech wont shatter but can scratch and can’t be fixed. I’d maybe look at a sub or a radiomir since you already have the 511
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 07:00 AM   #3
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
that carbon looks great ,,, but , no polishing it at service time.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2017, 03:22 AM   #4
Xerxes77
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
Carbotech fot me
Xerxes77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2017, 05:44 PM   #5
Tournesol72
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Miami
Posts: 15
Had an AP Diver in carbon. It felt like a $8 plastic toy. I’d buy Carbotech
Tournesol72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2017, 06:16 PM   #6
SC11
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tournesol72 View Post
Had an AP Diver in carbon. It felt like a $8 plastic toy. I’d buy Carbotech
That doesn’t make sense?!

Your ‘$8 plastic toy’ comment seems to put the AP carbon down yet you are advising to be a Pam carbon?!
SC11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2017, 09:04 PM   #7
WatchObsess
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Rio de jeneiro
Posts: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tournesol72 View Post
Had an AP Diver in carbon. It felt like a $8 plastic toy. I’d buy Carbotech
May I ask why you felt that way? Didn't forged carbon suit you? Or was it the light weight that felt cheap?
I am trying to figure out because I don't want to have buyers remorse if I get the carbotech. After all it is also carbon, albeit with a different technology. I really like how you can see the different layers almost like some sort of swirls.

Sent from my A1601 using Tapatalk
WatchObsess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2017, 10:22 PM   #8
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
Carbotech my choice
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2017, 09:19 AM   #9
oldsalt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Peter
Location: Australia.
Watch: ?????
Posts: 1,015
Carbotech....
__________________
EXP II - DSSD (blue) - PAM 643 - PAM 724 - PAM 424 - PAM 1499 - GRUPPO GAMA - PAM 1305 - Breguet XXI - 116500LN & BLNR....gone
oldsalt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2017, 10:16 PM   #10
eugenes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Seoul, Korea
Watch: Daytona S/S Black
Posts: 40
carbotech!!
__________________
116710LN SS GMT IIC (V-series)
116520 SS Daytona Black (M-series)
16610LV SS Green Sub (M-series)
eugenes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2017, 03:17 AM   #11
jenniferjanef
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,828
Wow that last photo of the 18KPG with army green rubber is stunning! LOVE IT!!
jenniferjanef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2017, 04:42 AM   #12
boxterduke
"TRF" Member
 
boxterduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Tdot
Watch: Panerai PAM422
Posts: 42
Personally I don't like the 661's carbon patters. The 616 pattern look way better but that's just my opinion

As for the 438 and 441 the difference is the bracelet and the blacked out movement on the back of the 438. If you are willing to pay more for a bracelet then go for the 438. The black on black look can easily be changed with strap combo.

Personally I love the blacked out movement of the 438 however I love my money more and won't pay the premium that comes with the bracelet so I would go with the 441 if I was choosing between it or the 438

I have a 422 and I keep eyeing the 577
boxterduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2017, 06:50 AM   #13
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,299
441 for me. Love the ceramic and asso combo.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2017, 11:34 AM   #14
WatchObsess
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Rio de jeneiro
Posts: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxterduke View Post
Personally I don't like the 661's carbon patters. The 616 pattern look way better but that's just my opinion

As for the 438 and 441 the difference is the bracelet and the blacked out movement on the back of the 438. If you are willing to pay more for a bracelet then go for the 438. The black on black look can easily be changed with strap combo.

Personally I love the blacked out movement of the 438 however I love my money more and won't pay the premium that comes with the bracelet so I would go with the 441 if I was choosing between it or the 438

I have a 422 and I keep eyeing the 577
Always !
Thanks for your insight. I still have a year before making a decision but will have to see them in flesh. Difficult to judge with pictures only

Sent from my A1601 using Tapatalk
WatchObsess is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.