The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 December 2017, 10:02 PM   #31
KBM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,453
There's definitely room for both in a collection. The 500 is much more sporty, while the 520 is dressier and classic.
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2017, 10:04 PM   #32
HorologyK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,363
Ceramic for me. Just looks sportier and my steel bezel scratched very easily.
HorologyK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2017, 10:07 PM   #33
topgear
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Middle East
Watch: 116710 LN, PAM390
Posts: 887
Between the ceramic and non-ceramic Daytona, I think the ceramic Daytona is stunning.

However, I will buy and wear the non ceramic one if I come across a good deal.
topgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2017, 10:14 PM   #34
reloxt
"TRF" Member
 
reloxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Ted
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 383
I absolutely prefer steel for the black version. For the white, I think I would go ceramic...
__________________
Instagram : @ted_watches

...Done flipping and changing....... (never...)
reloxt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2017, 10:46 PM   #35
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,447
Yes. The SS Zenith Daytonas are far and away my favorite.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2017, 10:48 PM   #36
ecdc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: US
Posts: 502
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarbears View Post
I think they are beautiful and I’m craving one.
Yes. I find them more elegant.
ecdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2017, 10:59 PM   #37
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,993
16520>116500>116520
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2017, 10:59 PM   #38
Jambo86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Middle Earth
Watch: GMT-Master II BLNR
Posts: 106
This thread NEEDS photos!
Jambo86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2017, 11:12 PM   #39
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
I prefer the white D500, better protection, better size and better bezel contrast.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2017, 11:34 PM   #40
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,827
I like them both.

But I prefer the contrast, size, and style of the ceramic. It makes for a very elegant, sporty watch.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2017, 11:45 PM   #41
MCO1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
It's a Daytona both in the words of Cole Porter are "the top"! I ended up with a Daytona C so that's my favorite had I pulled the trigger on a 116520 when they were $10k I've no doubt that would be my favorite. I will concede that the non-ceramic bezel is a bit dressier and I could see owning a black one in the future to complement the white C.
MCO1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2017, 11:54 PM   #42
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
16520>116500>116520
correct except the typo in the middle
16520>116520>116500
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2017, 12:17 AM   #43
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,525
No

Ceramic fan here
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2017, 12:30 AM   #44
rossi46
2024 Pledge Member
 
rossi46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruins7 View Post
The ceramic on the daytona to me makes it look way too sporty
Thus the reason why I much prefer the 116500.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob
rossi46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2017, 12:31 AM   #45
rossi46
2024 Pledge Member
 
rossi46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
16520>116500>116520
I'd probably agree with that, and only add one to the beginning:

6263>16520>116500>116520

__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob
rossi46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2017, 01:36 AM   #46
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,011
I'm going to have to say no...I've had both and much prefer the ceramic.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2017, 01:42 AM   #47
Juantxo
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Utopia
Posts: 2,101
I do. I have one of each and I prefer the one with steel bezel.
Juantxo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2017, 03:27 AM   #48
skkali168
"TRF" Member
 
skkali168's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: RP
Location: irvine
Watch: 116689
Posts: 1,222
I like both. Must have both for the collection :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
skkali168 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2017, 07:35 PM   #49
Kenrocks
"TRF" Member
 
Kenrocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 350


I can’t decide ....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kenrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2017, 07:38 PM   #50
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,674
I like the ceramic..

__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
daytona , rolex , steel


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.