ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 February 2018, 04:57 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: US
Posts: 219
|
Daytona Advice Needed
I currently have a 116520 White Dial. I have an option to get a New Ceramic Black Dial 1165500.
For those of you that own or owned 116520 and 116500 either white or black, and you have to choose, which one you prefer and why. Those of you that sold 116520 to get 116500, any regrets? If I pass, it will be a while for next opportunity as there are a number of people on the list. I don’t want to flip the 116500 as I value opportunity from the AD. Thanks |
6 February 2018, 05:16 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
|
I think a 116520 makes a great pair with a 116500. You've only got to determine which pair better works for you. In my case, the perfect Daytona duo was the black dial 6520 with the white dial 6500.
If you must choose one, consider that it's unlikely that you will find a nib 116520 for a reasonable price down the road. The D500, while difficult to get, will be around for msrp for a long time still. |
6 February 2018, 05:43 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
Daytona Advice Needed
Quote:
I sold a 116520 black dial and picked up a 116500 white dial and I couldn't be happier. It's very much a personal choice but to me it came down to a few things: 1 - the ceramic bezel made the watch look/feel bigger 2 - It's WAY less shiny/blingy 3 - I find the white dial with the black sub-dials easier to read 4 - Sometimes you just don't bond with a watch. That's how it was for the SS version. But the Ceramic White dial I absolutely love.
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
|
6 February 2018, 06:14 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 157
|
I had your same watch a couple of years ago (white dial 116520) and I could not get used to those mirror finish silver sub dials. I even sourced a WG panda dial to swap in but in the end traded it toward a WG sub. I'm on the list for a 116500 and would take either dial.
The only 'regret' is that the trade-in value has jumped quite a bit...but no regrets getting rid of it. |
6 February 2018, 06:49 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,424
|
I haven't owned either of the two you're discussing, but I'd buy the Ceramic and own both. You then can determine which you really want (if not both?), and then you can sell whichever doesn't last. You're not buying the Ceramic to flip, and if you have a good relationship with your AD, hopefully they will understand if you decide to flip at some point in the future.
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE |
6 February 2018, 07:07 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Roger
Location: ...
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 6,309
|
Daytona Advice Needed
Having worn both — I have to say that overall I am partial to the 116520 — but they most DEFINITELY can do-exist, they wear quite differently. So if you really want it — buy it - you won’t regret it.
The Ceramic bezel makes the watch more sporty — the classic steel bezel has a more sporty/dress aspect to me. Just my .02 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 February 2018, 08:54 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
|
They definitely complement each other. I wouldn't think one is necessarily superior to the other.
|
6 February 2018, 09:07 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Laguna Beach, CA
Watch: Deep Sea Blue
Posts: 237
|
I was in the same position as you-had a black dial 116520 and was going to sell it to fund the white dial ceramic 116500. I just couldn't let go of the 116520. It was one of my favorites and it has such a classy and rich look to it, especially with the black dial and stainless bezel. I ended up keeping it and was lucky enough to purchase a white dial ceramic from my dealer. (I called him the day the ceramic 116500 was released at Basel and was first on the list) So my advice is to keep it and get the new one if you can swing it!
Life is short, enjoy your watches everyday, just my 2 cents... Last edited by 1Daytona; 6 February 2018 at 09:09 AM.. Reason: typo |
6 February 2018, 10:01 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
|
I owned the 116520 and currently have the 116500. I enjoyed the 116520 but like the 116500 a bit more. The polished bezel of the outgoing model was tough to maintain and the silver subrings were a little hard to read. Both are great though and I would have kept the 116520 if it were a black dial as my DayronaC is white.
|
6 February 2018, 10:02 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
|
If one of each I’d seek white 520 and black 500
I’ve owned all four so that’s my take. First choice would be both ceramics. |
6 February 2018, 10:13 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andrew Wilson
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Watch: 16550 Explorer II
Posts: 1,773
|
White is more legible.
__________________
6284 SS, 16014 SS Jubilee silver stick, 16253 TT Blue Thunderbird, 16550 SS Exp II Cream, bought in 1986, 116400GV Z-blue Milgauss, 79260 Tudor, 116660 DSSD-Blue, 116500LV Daytona White, 116710 BLNR, 326934 Blue Skydweller |
6 February 2018, 10:15 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Denmark
Posts: 23
|
I own a black dial 116500 and I absolutely love the sporty and robust look. I think the SS bezel on the 116500 is a bit to shiny, however it is a bit more classy.
Keep both for a month or so and then make your decision. |
6 February 2018, 10:33 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
|
|
6 February 2018, 10:42 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
|
With the market veing what it is now, get it and decide later what you want to do with it. Keep it or flip it!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
6 February 2018, 11:25 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: YL
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 701
|
The 116520 white and 116500 black will be a great pair!
__________________
Instagram: litwing23 |
6 February 2018, 11:29 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I prefer the ceramic, just wish it had a panda dial.
|
6 February 2018, 11:41 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: aroundtheworld
Watch: SS Daytona - BLACK
Posts: 2,261
|
They are both completely different watches. I have the 116520 in the black dial and the 116500 in the white dial. For the 116500 I prefer the white dial, as the dial is completely new. The black dial is just the same as the previous version. Additionally, I also love the contrast in the black and white dial of the 116500. It actually adds a "pop" to the watch. I would hold out only for the white dial....and not rush into getting the black one, unless you really want it.
__________________
116520 Black - 116500 White - 116713LN - 116613LB - Panerai 389 - Chopard Mille Miglia GMT Chronograph - Chopard LUC Sport 2000 - Moser Pioneer Centre Seconds |
6 February 2018, 11:46 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northeast
Posts: 943
|
Get it. You'll have the best of each version. The 520 in white is great and the black D500 is stunning.
The black D500 is my favorite of all versions. Pics do it no justice.
__________________
16610LV 16200 116600 116500 |
6 February 2018, 11:49 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
|
White 116520 and black 116500 would be the ideal pairing of Daytonas for me...if you are able to have both, that'd be my choice.
Only one? Black 116500...had mine for over a year and a half now and still love it. Coming from a guy like me, with a wandering eye when it comes to watches, that says a lot. |
6 February 2018, 12:11 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Milo
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 922
|
Had the black face. Sold it and got a white face and then added red colored hands to the sub dials and large second hand.
Now my old eyes can see the time at a glance. Worked out well for me. |
6 February 2018, 01:24 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Allan
Location: Little Red Dot
Watch: Still Looking....!
Posts: 3,899
|
I'd sold my 116520 white for the 500C white. No regrets~~
|
6 February 2018, 01:27 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Dominik
Location: Zürich
Watch: Rolex, Patek, FPJ
Posts: 381
|
Add don’t flip
|
8 February 2018, 12:29 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: US
Posts: 219
|
Thanks for all the replies
|
8 February 2018, 12:32 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
I would think the two would co-exist very nicely. Fellow KY member here...where are you getting the D500?
|
8 February 2018, 01:49 AM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: NY
Posts: 2,515
|
__________________
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. - Albert Einstein |
8 February 2018, 03:01 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 723
|
116520 for the retro and classic look. The ceramic for the modern look. Both are nice in their own way. If you're a collector, you gotta start with the 116520 and eventually have both.
__________________
JJ |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.