ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Diversd · 16 February 2018, 05:51 AM

I know there has been 1,000 threads regarding the new vs old Explorer II size but I was hoping you guys could help me out. I’m relatively new to watch collecting. My only other watch is a two line 14060M. I do have a Luminox Jolly Roger but that’s more of a novelty. I was looking to add an Explorer II Polar to the collection but feel the 40 is just a hair too small and the 42 is a hair too big. I’ve included a couple of wrist shots of each and hoping to get some advice as to which looks better. The maxi dial on the 42 isn’t ideal but with the smaller no date sub I thought it might be a nice contrast. Thanks for all your advice!

JacksonStone · 16 February 2018, 05:55 AM

Do you know your wrist size and shape? Flatter shape means you can get away with larger watches even with a smaller wrist size. And so on.

Also, images are small and hard to see. (Unless there's a way to expand attached images that I'm not aware of.)

tlbarrs · 16 February 2018, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diversd

I know there has been 1,000 threads regarding the new vs old Explorer II size but I was hoping you guys could help me out. I’m relatively new to watch collecting. My only other watch is a two line 14060M. I do have a Luminox Jolly Roger but that’s more of a novelty. I was looking to add an Explorer II Polar to the collection but feel the 40 is just a hair too small and the 42 is a hair too big. I’ve included a couple of wrist shots of each and hoping to get some advice as to which looks better. The maxi dial on the 42 isn’t ideal but with the smaller no date sub I thought it might be a nice contrast. Thanks for all your advice!

I brought the 42mm on Monday but I went for the black as it will be my only Rolex and love it. Funny enough the only other Rolex I’ve owned was a 2011 no date Sub if it was me I’d go for the 42mm over the 40mm the bracelet is a big improvement, it looks good on you mate and if buying new you get 5 years warranty win win.

tlbarrs · 16 February 2018, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tlbarrs

I brought the 42mm on Monday but I went for the black as it will be my only Rolex and love it. Funny enough the only other Rolex I’ve owned was a 2011 no date Sub if it was me I’d go for the 42mm over the 40mm the bracelet is a big improvement, it looks good on you mate and if buying new you get 5 years warranty win win.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jlevitt9 · 16 February 2018, 06:08 AM

I don't think the 42mm looks too big on you, FWIW.

Diversd · 16 February 2018, 06:09 AM

Thanks for the response. I just realized the pictures are a bit blurry. I kept downsizing them from my iPhone until they were able to upload. I'm new at this so I'm sure there is a better way of uploading iPhone images. My wrist is around 7.5 inches, maybe a tad bigger. I would say my wrist is pretty flat although with my 40mm Sub there is a slight separation at the end of each lug so it doesn't sit completely flat.

drm20 · 16 February 2018, 06:19 AM

42 looks good on you, and you'll get used to it the more you wear it. Good luck!

chris242 · 16 February 2018, 06:22 AM

the 42 feels too big on my wrist .. love the 40! end of the day it’s all personal preference and i’m sure you’d get used to the bigger dial pretty quickly!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Diversd · 16 February 2018, 06:31 AM

Thanks....I love the black as well! I just thought the white would be a good alternative with the black sub and then eventually a Speedy down the line. I'm having a little trouble with the fatter hands (especially the minute hand) but I'm sure that I would get used to it over time. I take a lot of dive trips and this seems like it would be very legible underwater.

encarter13 · 16 February 2018, 06:34 AM

I bought the 40mm. Love it and happy with my purchase. Although a 5 digit can't be considered vintage, my other two Rolex watches are 6 digit references, so I feel like I bought a vintage model with my 16570.

Diversd · 16 February 2018, 06:57 AM

I really appreciate everyone's opinions. I know you can't go wrong either way which almost makes the decision harder..lol Since I already have the 40mm Sub, I think I'm going to try the 42mm Exp II in Polar. Although I'm not completely in love with the fatter hands just yet, I'm sure that I'll appreciate the better legibility scuba diving or in lower light situations.

Foxglove · 16 February 2018, 07:47 AM

Images are very fuzzy.

But does appear to me like the 40mm side fits you better for my taste. Hard to tell from the fuzzy images.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

16 February 2018, 05:51 AM	#1
Diversd "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: San Diego Posts: 19	Rolex Explorer II Dilema I know there has been 1,000 threads regarding the new vs old Explorer II size but I was hoping you guys could help me out. I’m relatively new to watch collecting. My only other watch is a two line 14060M. I do have a Luminox Jolly Roger but that’s more of a novelty. I was looking to add an Explorer II Polar to the collection but feel the 40 is just a hair too small and the 42 is a hair too big. I’ve included a couple of wrist shots of each and hoping to get some advice as to which looks better. The maxi dial on the 42 isn’t ideal but with the smaller no date sub I thought it might be a nice contrast. Thanks for all your advice! Attached Images

16 February 2018, 06:34 AM	#10
encarter13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Real Name: Nick Location: Georgia Posts: 2,613	I bought the 40mm. Love it and happy with my purchase. Although a 5 digit can't be considered vintage, my other two Rolex watches are 6 digit references, so I feel like I bought a vintage model with my 16570. __________________ Instagram - watches_wine

16 February 2018, 07:47 AM	#12
Foxglove "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Ross Location: Houston, TX Watch: yourself Posts: 838	Images are very fuzzy. But does appear to me like the 40mm side fits you better for my taste. Hard to tell from the fuzzy images. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ https://www.instagram.com/watchitross/

16 February 2018, 05:55 AM	#2
JacksonStone Banned Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Oregon Posts: 5,150	Do you know your wrist size and shape? Flatter shape means you can get away with larger watches even with a smaller wrist size. And so on. Also, images are small and hard to see. (Unless there's a way to expand attached images that I'm not aware of.)

16 February 2018, 06:08 AM	#5
jlevitt9 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 134	I don't think the 42mm looks too big on you, FWIW.

16 February 2018, 06:09 AM	#6
Diversd "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: San Diego Posts: 19	Thanks for the response. I just realized the pictures are a bit blurry. I kept downsizing them from my iPhone until they were able to upload. I'm new at this so I'm sure there is a better way of uploading iPhone images. My wrist is around 7.5 inches, maybe a tad bigger. I would say my wrist is pretty flat although with my 40mm Sub there is a slight separation at the end of each lug so it doesn't sit completely flat.

16 February 2018, 06:19 AM	#7
drm20 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Dave Location: Scottsdale, AZ Watch: Just one more Posts: 1,062	42 looks good on you, and you'll get used to it the more you wear it. Good luck!

16 February 2018, 06:22 AM	#8
chris242 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: The Bahamas Watch: 116610lv Posts: 1,078	the 42 feels too big on my wrist .. love the 40! end of the day it’s all personal preference and i’m sure you’d get used to the bigger dial pretty quickly! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

16 February 2018, 06:31 AM	#9
Diversd "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: San Diego Posts: 19	Thanks....I love the black as well! I just thought the white would be a good alternative with the black sub and then eventually a Speedy down the line. I'm having a little trouble with the fatter hands (especially the minute hand) but I'm sure that I would get used to it over time. I take a lot of dive trips and this seems like it would be very legible underwater.

16 February 2018, 06:57 AM	#11
Diversd "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: San Diego Posts: 19	I really appreciate everyone's opinions. I know you can't go wrong either way which almost makes the decision harder..lol Since I already have the 40mm Sub, I think I'm going to try the 42mm Exp II in Polar. Although I'm not completely in love with the fatter hands just yet, I'm sure that I'll appreciate the better legibility scuba diving or in lower light situations.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)