ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 March 2018, 12:58 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Singapore
Posts: 266
|
+1 to above
|
3 March 2018, 04:22 AM | #32 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: California
Posts: 1,250
|
The 15300 is much better proportioned.
The 15300 has a better bezel to dial ratio. The 15400 wears big. I also like how the 15300 has the AP logo as the 12 marker.
|
3 March 2018, 04:56 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I don't know I think the 300 is a little bit bezel heavy, 41 a little dial heavy, so TBH I think a 40mm would be the Goldilocks of this line.
|
3 March 2018, 08:38 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 136
|
I guess that's a more accurate description. I was surprised that the 15300 did not fit as well as I'd hoped, considering that it's 39 mm. But I never read about this, so I wonder if I'm the only one...
|
3 March 2018, 08:59 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
|
Yeah, we are on the same page! The 15300 fits borderline okay on my wrist. I’m thinking the 15450 would be a nice fit...
__________________
Adam |
3 March 2018, 09:00 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
|
I prefer the dial on the 15400
|
8 March 2018, 06:37 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Singapore
Posts: 179
|
15300 or 15202 > 15400
The prices for 15300s though... starting to change the conversation. |
9 March 2018, 12:11 AM | #38 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,406
|
|
9 March 2018, 12:49 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: wait list
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 551
|
I think the 15300 would be a perfect fit
|
9 March 2018, 01:53 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,288
|
15300
|
9 March 2018, 03:05 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
AP are kind of genius for making the 15202 the "goldilocks" size and proportion. From their standpoint it makes sense not to have a standard RO in the same size as the Jumbo. Anyone who finds the 15400 too large and the 15450 too small (and can't find a 15300) gets funneled into the 15202.
I always thought it was kind of funny that they made the 15300 the same size as the Jumbo. |
9 March 2018, 03:13 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: NH
Watch: 228239, PAM00684
Posts: 2,121
|
15300 for sure
__________________
Rolex 228239 PAM00684 |
9 March 2018, 03:46 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 404
|
15400 for me
|
9 March 2018, 05:07 AM | #44 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
|
15400
|
10 March 2018, 09:13 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Tellus
Watch: 5711
Posts: 18
|
15300 for sure. 15400 is to big.
|
11 March 2018, 12:40 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: hk
Posts: 691
|
15400 is doable
15450 is unisex watch - good choice if you plan to share with your wife or gf |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.