ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 April 2018, 10:03 AM | #91 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: los angeles
Posts: 19
|
excellent information here on Rolex as "investment." I think when people use this word they are using it to describe whether it serves more as storage of wealth rather than buying shares of stocks or bonds. Currently the stock market is at all time highs and in due time our portfoilos can decrease anywhere from 20-50% with a recession.
IMHO, if we have desirable Rolex models, it will retain much of its value and in 10-20 years the return will be of equal and/or higher value. General invesment advice do suggest keeping 'hard assets' in our portfolios at approx 10% which refer to precious metals (ie gold, silver). Why not have a Rolex as part of that category. -JR |
12 April 2018, 11:13 AM | #92 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,168
|
Investments pay dividends. Dividends buy me Rolexes!
|
13 April 2018, 01:46 PM | #93 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: MI
Watch: 124060
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
|
|
13 April 2018, 11:34 PM | #94 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
|
To me wearing a Rolex is an investmant, not necessarily to make money but to enjoy and hold its value very well.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk |
13 April 2018, 11:40 PM | #95 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London/Asia
Watch: GMT LN/SD43/D Blue
Posts: 872
|
|
13 April 2018, 11:53 PM | #96 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Steve
Location: Little Rock, AR
Watch: Z blue Milgauss
Posts: 207
|
I go by 2 "rules" of thumb: avoid leveraging depreciating assets, and understand the true cost of ownership (e.g. insurance, maintenance, depreciation, and time-value of money, etc.). Rolex watches can perform much better than many other expensive hobbies like cars, clothes, and technology. Buy smart, consider used, and you can get pretty close to wearing a savings account on your wrist.
__________________
2016 Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Z-Blue 2015 Frederique Constant FC715H4S6 Manufacture Moon Phase 2015 Seiko SARG017 |
14 April 2018, 12:09 AM | #97 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,089
|
Not sure why one would get a Rolex, or any watch for that matter, as an investment
I prefer not to wear my long-term financial security on my wrist |
14 April 2018, 12:18 AM | #98 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Teddy
Location: London U.K.
Watch: sea-dweller 126600
Posts: 670
|
25/30% drop? SS professional models drop like that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 April 2018, 12:33 AM | #99 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
Quote:
If its 50% lower than today in 10-20 years, I can pretty much guarantee that your rolex will also be worth nothing as there will be much bigger problems than trying to sell a watch not a single person can afford. Your watches value is tied to the general health of the economy in a big way so it is illogical to put money in watches to hedge against a stock market crash. I agree with the concept of a Rolex as a cash equivalent as savings accounts make no interest anyway.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
|
14 April 2018, 12:53 AM | #100 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Bi coastal
Watch: Ok...Watching
Posts: 937
|
What he said^
|
14 April 2018, 11:24 AM | #101 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: los angeles
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
*Tyler. I agree with all your points. I am not stating that we buy Rolex as a cash equivalent to sell when we need to in a down market. I am simply stating that stocks are at all time high and probably a bubble. Next drop will not be pretty and there can easily be a 30-50% drop. Of course the market will return and I feel that the Rolex SS models should retain its price and with a return in economic health, the watch will preserve and possibly be higher than its original pricing. |
|
14 April 2018, 09:37 PM | #102 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami Beach FL US
Posts: 1,425
|
You are right in everything. And aside you forgot what a service is worth (around $ 700 that you will need in ten years). When you try to sell it you will never get the same price that you see in the ads of the gray dealers. I assure you that in my long life I sold many things not only watches and I assure you that dealing with a gray dealer is much better than a private one because they have a few dollars and think that they are the kings of the world and will exploit you to the fullest. IMHO.
|
15 April 2018, 02:25 AM | #103 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4
|
Hmmm...
Not sure I agree with those depreciation numbers at all. Are you buying the wrong watches? I'm no stock market guru but every Rolex I have had has averaged 12% increase in value per year. My 401K has been as low as 7%. My 1982 GMT Master was purchased for $2800 and I sold it like a idiot for 6K 7 years later. Probably a 12K watch now. My 5513 was purchased for 5K and I was offered 10K for it last week. Compare with various JLC's/IWC's etc. I have been beaten up by 50% on several! It's also a helluva lot more fun than stocks :) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.