ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 April 2018, 05:18 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New York
Posts: 244
|
40 mm standard size of GMT, Daytona, Subs
Are you guys fine with the 40 mm size of these watches? ironically when I first started looking into subs, It was through internet photos, and for some reason if you judge the watch’s size by internet photos it looks much bigger than when seeing it in person. I think I’m okay with the size but certainly would not have minded a 41 or 42 mm max. Jus curious how you guys feel about the standard 40 mm size of the GMT’s, Subs, Daytona’s
|
30 April 2018, 05:23 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,619
|
I think the large lugs make up for it!
|
30 April 2018, 06:10 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
|
Just fine the way they are.
|
30 April 2018, 06:11 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,695
|
perfection!
__________________
PP Geneva |
30 April 2018, 06:17 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
Fits me great, but I have a small wrist.
|
30 April 2018, 06:20 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
|
Anything between 39.9mm and 40.1mm is right in the ballpark for me.
I used to stay between 39.99mm and 40.01mm but have relaxed my standards a bit. I get more flexible with age. |
30 April 2018, 06:30 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 383
|
40mm is the perfect size imho.
|
30 April 2018, 06:32 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
Big enough for most. Too big for some. IMHO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
30 April 2018, 06:49 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
|
|
30 April 2018, 07:08 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
|
Moreso it seems unlikely after they release a brand new Pepsi GMT and it stayed the same 40mm. No way they’re dropping that case size any time in the near future.
|
30 April 2018, 07:16 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
|
30 April 2018, 07:18 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3,495
|
I have all three and while they all wear differently, they all wear larger than you would think if you just looked at the specs. The Daytona wears particularly well though.
|
30 April 2018, 07:19 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Rockland Co. NY
Watch: GMT Master 1973ca
Posts: 231
|
I have a 40 mm GMT and the SDJC 1st gen 44mm and both fit me fine, big wrist.
__________________
[SIZE="4"]Basque1[/SIZE] |
30 April 2018, 07:22 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
40mm Daytona is different than a 40mm sub (6 digit), and I like it that way. The Daytona is a little on the small side for me, but super comfy. I love the versatility of having both. But 40mm can be very different watch to watch. Rolex does it really well IMO.
|
30 April 2018, 07:22 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
40mm is a nice fit for me and my 8'' wrist. I think the six digit with the maxi case will definitely look bigger than the older five digit models.
|
30 April 2018, 07:30 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
|
40 makes it easy to wear 24/7 and forget about it until you need the time.
|
30 April 2018, 08:04 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
|
I like 40mm and think it's timeless in being the perfect balance for small/large wrists.
|
30 April 2018, 08:20 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,944
|
It's the perfect size in my opinion.
__________________
Current Rolex Submariner 126610LN || Cartier Tank Americaine |
30 April 2018, 08:52 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Galaxy
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 905
|
The new ones wear bigger than the 40mm size would suggest. I think 40mm is a fantastic size for most people. Big enough to have presence but certainly wouldn't be too big for the vast majority of men.
That being said, I rotate between a 42 and 43mm watch. If you want a bigger Sub, then give the SD43 a look. It might be just the watch you are looking for. |
30 April 2018, 09:01 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Taylor Tolbert
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 181
|
40mm is great for Rolex. My Panerai is 44mm and I love wearing it, but I prefer 40mm watches for daily wear
|
30 April 2018, 09:05 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
|
40mm is da** near perfect! People thought it was big years ago and small now but in reality it is a timeless size that ignore's trends.
|
30 April 2018, 09:25 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Watch: AP/Rolex
Posts: 108
|
I also think it's perfect, 40mm is a good size.
|
30 April 2018, 09:26 AM | #23 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,253
|
40mm is the perfect size. 36mm is too small for most men. 44mm is too big for most men. 40mm is right in the middle.
For me personally, anything from 38 to 42 is in the sweet spot. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
30 April 2018, 10:03 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,669
|
It's the smallest watch I have and it looks it. But it looks just right to me. I rotate it with (among others) a 42mm Exp 2. I love them both and consider them to both be the right size for what they are.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.