The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 May 2018, 12:35 PM   #1
KevGoo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 96
Please take a look at this no crown sub and some thoughts

Hi guys
Can anyone take a look at this sub and let me know about the period - dial, bezel etc. any input helps!
Thank you in advance!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
KevGoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2018, 01:06 PM   #2
vintagewatch
"TRF" Member
 
vintagewatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: David
Location: Colorado, USA
Watch: Sport 4digit ref#
Posts: 295
It could be a 6204, 6202, 6536, 6508 (James Bond). It's hard to tell (for me at least) which particular model it is. You should take the band off to see the case reference and serial number to determine approximate year of production. This information will allow for more informed opinions of the watch.
vintagewatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2018, 01:21 PM   #3
KevGoo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagewatch View Post
It could be a 6204, 6202, 6536, 6508 (James Bond). It's hard to tell (for me at least) which particular model it is. You should take the band off to see the case reference and serial number to determine approximate year of production. This information will allow for more informed opinions of the watch.


Does this look authentic?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
KevGoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2018, 01:32 PM   #4
vintagewatch
"TRF" Member
 
vintagewatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: David
Location: Colorado, USA
Watch: Sport 4digit ref#
Posts: 295
It looks like a real Submariner, however I would not render an opinion as to the components (movement, bezel insert, dial, hands, etc.) being original to the watch without more pictures along with the case reference and serial number (partial ok) which are located between the lugs.
vintagewatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2018, 02:14 PM   #5
KevGoo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagewatch View Post
It looks like a real Submariner, however I would not render an opinion as to the components (movement, bezel insert, dial, hands, etc.) being original to the watch without more pictures along with the case reference and serial number (partial ok) which are located between the lugs.


It is serial is 400k/1958 according to the owner.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
KevGoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2018, 03:51 PM   #6
themaninblack
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,058
It has a crown! But no crown guards. Looks like a later 5508, exclamation mark but with that case number, hmm? Not quite right. Maybe some service parts, maybe some lume repair? Need to see the case back. Looks to gave a genuine tropic 16 crystal which is a good feature but just a single photo can be a deceptive thing. For example the crystal has many scratches and crazes that can distort the features on the dial in close ups.
themaninblack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2018, 06:16 PM   #7
Mike Wood
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike Wood
Location: Liverpool UK
Watch: Listen & Learn!
Posts: 611
Looks like a very nice 1958-ish Rolex Submariner ref. 5508 with original gloss gilt print exclamation point chapter ring dial with silver depth rating. Hands are nicely matched to the dial markers. Bezel insert appears to be slightly later service replacement. Case looks good, bracelet ditto; what's not to like?

No alarm bells ringing for me!

MW

Mike Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2018, 09:06 PM   #8
KevGoo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 96


Here is another picture of the dial


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
KevGoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2018, 09:06 PM   #9
KevGoo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by themaninblack View Post
It has a crown! But no crown guards. Looks like a later 5508, exclamation mark but with that case number, hmm? Not quite right. Maybe some service parts, maybe some lume repair? Need to see the case back. Looks to gave a genuine tropic 16 crystal which is a good feature but just a single photo can be a deceptive thing. For example the crystal has many scratches and crazes that can distort the features on the dial in close ups.


Does it appear to have some lime repair?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
KevGoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2018, 10:53 PM   #10
fmc000
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevGoo View Post
Does it appear to have some lime repair?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You got an answer from Mike Wood, you really couldn't ask for more.
fmc000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2018, 11:15 PM   #11
linesiders
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
linesiders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by fmc000 View Post
You got an answer from Mike Wood, you really couldn't ask for more.
^^^^^ This
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg!
linesiders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2018, 11:55 PM   #12
themaninblack
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,058
Indeed but the OP may have no idea who Mike Wood is!

Anyway the dial looks excellent but it has always been a bit of an anomaly that a relatively small number of Rolex 5508's with 1958 markings have exclamation dials when there is a general consensus that these dials were not manufactured until about 1962. That means perhaps that either Rolex released a batch of old cases with old case numbers at a much later date or the original dials were swapped out perhaps in certain markets. Mike might know an alternative reason.
themaninblack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2018, 12:22 AM   #13
roh123
"TRF" Member
 
roh123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
The exclamation dot kind of puts it later in my mind but with Rolex you never know. My guess would be that it went in for a service around 1962 and got a new dial and hands. Insert is obviously much later than that.

In the early 60’s there was a lot of talks about radiation and I believe a lot of watches got new dial and hands as Rolex tried to comply with the new radiation standards.

Looks like a very nice piece.
__________________
Instagram: @perj123
roh123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2018, 02:09 AM   #14
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevGoo View Post

Here is another picture of the dial

Beautiful
__________________
https://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=80782&dateline=139659  8629
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2018, 02:44 AM   #15
Autavian
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Miami Beach
Posts: 634
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevGoo View Post


Here is another picture of the dial


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This should be a 1961/62 5508
__________________
Follow me on Instagram@Autaviano

Email:[email protected]
Autavian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2018, 02:45 AM   #16
Autavian
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Miami Beach
Posts: 634
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Wood View Post
Looks like a very nice 1958-ish Rolex Submariner ref. 5508 with original gloss gilt print exclamation point chapter ring dial with silver depth rating. Hands are nicely matched to the dial markers. Bezel insert appears to be slightly later service replacement. Case looks good, bracelet ditto; what's not to like?

No alarm bells ringing for me!

MW

Mk2 ff actually works for a exclamation dial and is not a later service replacement. 1958 is too early for exclamation dial. 1958 cases start at 488 serials. This is a bit later.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram@Autaviano

Email:[email protected]
Autavian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2018, 06:50 AM   #17
stmoore
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Autavian View Post
Mk2 ff actually works for a exclamation dial and is not a later service replacement. 1958 is too early for exclamation dial. 1958 cases start at 488 serials. This is a bit later.
This. What he said. 400 is no go with this dial.

I have a twin to this watch and it's a 763k (~1962) with a long 5 MK2. Exclamation has a fairly short run, 400k is simply too early.
stmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2018, 07:26 AM   #18
goin camping
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Milo
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 922
Can someone explain the "Exclamation point Dial" to me?

Here to learn and appreciate all of you guys that know so much. Thanks.
goin camping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2018, 07:31 AM   #19
roh123
"TRF" Member
 
roh123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by goin camping View Post
Can someone explain the "Exclamation point Dial" to me?

Here to learn and appreciate all of you guys that know so much. Thanks.
Believed to be a mark Rolex used to show that the lume has lower radiation. Something they used on the last chapter ring dials before moving on to the underline which probably show the switch from radium to tritium.
__________________
Instagram: @perj123
roh123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2018, 07:34 AM   #20
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: Many
Posts: 3,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by roh123 View Post
Believed to be a mark Rolex used to show that the lume has lower radiation. Something they used on the last chapter ring dials before moving on to the underline which probably show the switch from radium to tritium.
Specifically, the 6 o'clock marker has a dot below it, making it resemble an exclamation mark.
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2018, 08:48 AM   #21
Filipćo
"TRF" Member
 
Filipćo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Filipe
Location: Lisbon & Wadesdah
Watch: Never too many
Posts: 1,898
That's precisely my 5508 (#762.XXX)
Filipćo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2018, 09:13 AM   #22
linesiders
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
linesiders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
Some later ones DO have the Exclamation Dial. Perhaps if an earlier serial, dial was swapped out for Tritium -v- Original Radium
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg!
linesiders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2018, 10:54 AM   #23
GeoffIsringhausenJr.
"TRF" Member
 
GeoffIsringhausenJr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 61
It’s commonly accepted that exclamation should be a 61-62 however there is a late batch of high radium 1950’s exclamation 5508’s. I know of 3 like this not counting the watch from the OP bought from original owners. I bought this watch from the original owner in 2013 and they said they never had it serviced https://instagram.com/p/d3GUeTgFIN/
__________________
www.instagram.com/gisringhausen
GeoffIsringhausenJr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2018, 02:47 AM   #24
stmoore
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffIsringhausenJr. View Post
It’s commonly accepted that exclamation should be a 61-62 however there is a late batch of high radium 1950’s exclamation 5508’s. I know of 3 like this not counting the watch from the OP bought from original owners. I bought this watch from the original owner in 2013 and they said they never had it serviced https://instagram.com/p/d3GUeTgFIN/
Maybe they never had it serviced, but they did have the insert changed - so it visited an AD at some point.
stmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.