ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 November 2008, 11:18 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 31
|
possible to order new Sub Date without cyclops?
hi all? subject says it all, really.
if I were thinking of ordering a new Sub Date, might it be possible to specify a plain crystal without the cyclops lens? I know I could get the No Date instead, but I quite like the date; just prefer the plain look of a crystal without the lens... thanks much. |
20 November 2008, 11:42 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nice, France
Watch: D Sub date 16610
Posts: 929
|
I think this has been discussed before.
I don't think it is possible to order a plain crystal to sub date, but I have seen examples where the cyclops has been either been removed (it is actally glued on ) or crystal swap from a non-date Sub on this forum.
__________________
Nice is nice |
20 November 2008, 11:52 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
|
Erix, is correct. Just buy the standard watch and have the cyclops removed.
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best. f |
21 November 2008, 12:11 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
|
Its possible to remove the cyclops why dont you get a SD.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
21 November 2008, 12:17 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Sub without cyclops name Sub ND.
|
21 November 2008, 12:31 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: David
Location: SW Fla
Watch: SS Daytona & TT DJ
Posts: 1,430
|
I think I would just get a ND crystal, swap it out, and have the original in case I changed my mind or wanted to sell it. I have never seen a SD in the wild but I imagine there's quite a difference in height and weight on your wrist.
|
21 November 2008, 12:36 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
Hello Erik
Quote:
when it was discussed that it is inpossible to order the crystal of your choice.. |
|
21 November 2008, 01:32 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 31
|
thanks all; can the cyclops be removed without making an arse of the crystal, one presumes? would an AD do that, even? Is there a danger that Rolex would replace it back to official spec at a service, and charge me for it?
> Sub without cyclops name Sub ND. surely that's a Sub without the lens and without the date. I want the date but not the lens. and I thought the SD was bigger, more expensive. and isn't it discontinued now, in favour of the much bigger DS? thanks again for all the comments. I could of course just ask the AD, but I never trust 'em :) |
21 November 2008, 01:39 AM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Quote:
An AD offered to do it for free if I bought the watch he had for MSRP. I bought elsewhere for 20% off and it cost me $180 to make the conversion. The best money I ever spent. As for service, I have a Rolex certified master watchmaker who does all my work. He has no problem with the customization. Fr. John† |
|
21 November 2008, 02:07 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
Quote:
link comparing SD & Sub date http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=11764 |
|
21 November 2008, 02:11 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 31
|
ta much
|
21 November 2008, 02:16 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 31
|
one big point though: isn't the SD much more expensive than the Sub?
[edit: I see that's answered "no", in the referenced thread; I was confused, since I saw "replacement cost" I tihnk at Blowers that showed it much more] |
21 November 2008, 02:24 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
Quote:
The SD was always about £200 more than the sub. |
|
21 November 2008, 02:49 AM | #14 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
Sub Date: replacement cost £3,470 Sub no Date: replacement cost £3,140 Sub Date LV: replacement cost £3,690 SD: replacement cost £5,340 DSSD: replacement cost £5,340 and of course it's now obvious: they've mismarked their SD with the DSSD price. ok, I've got it now, thanks. now, what's the chances of me finding an AD with both a Sub and an SD for me to try on? :) |
|
21 November 2008, 02:56 AM | #15 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Now that makes sense......if you can still find one!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
21 November 2008, 06:02 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
|
21 November 2008, 09:03 AM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,218
|
I wouldn't do it ... if you wish to retain resale value.
|
21 November 2008, 09:08 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Louie
Location: CDC/FCGC
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 1,328
|
Buy the SD.....essentially, what you want and not messed with in an aftermarket way.
|
21 November 2008, 01:26 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SA, Texas.
Watch: * { SD & DJ } *
Posts: 943
|
Here is the solution..................................... Sea Dweller 16600.
|
21 November 2008, 07:24 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 31
|
thanks; I'd really like to try one on first, though, sigh...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.