ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Roly25 · 25 July 2017, 02:20 PM

Hey guys to I posted my third video just now! It is a review of the IWC Mark XVIII. Let me know what you think. I hope the quality of the videos is getting better over time!

Halothane · 28 July 2017, 07:45 AM

Very nice. I like the Mark XVIII.

Cru Jones · 28 July 2017, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomalf123

Very nice. I like the Mark XVIII.

x2

Thanks for the video.

Squalex · 29 July 2017, 08:39 AM

Great review, really liking this piece! How's the lume?

sierra11b · 13 August 2017, 02:17 AM

Loved my black one enough to buy the white one too. It's the perfect size.

Lume is just okay.

Psmith · 14 August 2017, 08:11 PM

Nicely done

Roly25 · 15 August 2017, 07:07 AM

Thanks guys!

bondtoys · 30 October 2017, 01:52 AM

Imo, you could have gotten a bit deeper into the topic.

Example: negative would be the very small amount of lume on the dial

You should also mention how intensively IWC modified the 2892-2calibre. Just wind the crown or listen to the rotor noise and you are getting an idea how much work went into making this calibre an IWC movement.

Lol-x · 31 October 2017, 02:06 PM

What are the nature of the modifications to the ETA movement?
I agree a deployant clasp is far superior and should have been included as standard with this watch. Tang is fine, I guess.
I prefer the black dial version. What is the deal with the blue dial version?

Star Ferry · 31 October 2017, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lol-x

What are the nature of the modifications to the ETA movement?
I agree a deployant clasp is far superior and should have been included as standard with this watch. Tang is fine, I guess.
I prefer the black dial version. What is the deal with the blue dial version?

I am wondering the same thing. Here is a photo of the same calibre (IWC 30110)

They engrave the rotor. It also says "Adjusted to 5 positions" so it seems that they also regulate the timing

The blue dial (Le Petit Prince edition) is the same price as white/black and is not limited. The caseback has an image of Le Petit Prince instead of a WWII era plane. Strap is brown with white stitching, as opposed to black with black stitching.

Star Ferry · 31 October 2017, 03:57 PM

the blue sunburst is nice. it does lack a color-matched date wheel, which highlights the odd date placement

bondtoys · 1 November 2017, 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lol-x

What are the nature of the modifications to the ETA movement?

I don‘t have details, but if you wind up the IWC, it feels significantly smoher than a regular ETA powered watch. And as said , the rotor noise is different and much more silent and smooth.

So I assume, that IWC modifies the mainspring section and corresponding geartrain and at least the rotor bearrings.

Runfar · 6 November 2017, 11:16 AM

excellent review- love that watch

Steph-paul · 18 March 2018, 02:51 AM

Great video, thank you very much for your work.

mad_1974 · 15 April 2018, 10:55 PM

Nice video; well done. I have the blue dial mark XVIII, and I really like the legibility, the look, the dial contrast. I'm good with the white date wheel, and the white stitching on the strap. The strap overall is great quality. The dial could use more lume, not a deal breaker. I'm not sure how much better the dial would look with the date window closer to the 3 o'clock position. Probably better, like the Mark XVI. The ETA base movement is not a big deal to me at this price point. To me, this watch was a wearable compromise for the Big Pilot, a watch I've looked at for years. I can't get over the wearability of a big watch that sits that high on the wrist; cost and re-sale being another. I've always liked IWC; this is my 3rd one (Aquatimer 2000 and 3714 being the others). This felt like to next logical step, and the negatives are minimal - date window placement and lack of lume at all the hour hash marks.

Syed117 · 17 April 2018, 03:56 AM

I really want to love it, but that date window should be a little more to the right.

I can't help but focus on it...

Dr. Robert · 19 April 2018, 01:12 AM

I thought the mark 18 used a Sellita movement?

otherminds · 15 May 2018, 12:49 AM

lovely review. I think the black dial would by my choice.

richierichie · 15 May 2018, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Robert

I thought the mark 18 used a Sellita movement?

All the originally launched Mark XVIII still come with the ETA (as they did when they were launched/designed). The new editions (tribute, heritage, etc) that launched afterwards come with the Sellita.

Jack T · 19 July 2018, 06:38 PM

Good review, and great follow up postings. The finer points on the movement, the date window placement, lume, all details I hadn’t considered. A very fine watch, like the blue dial.

25 July 2017, 02:20 PM	#1
Roly25 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2017 Location: MY Metro Area Watch: Rolex Milgauss, Posts: 233	IWC Mark XVIII Video Review Hey guys to I posted my third video just now! It is a review of the IWC Mark XVIII. Let me know what you think. I hope the quality of the videos is getting better over time! Last edited by Lol-x; 1 November 2017 at 05:04 PM.. Reason: YouTube code fixed.

14 August 2017, 08:11 PM	#6
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Nicely done __________________

31 October 2017, 02:06 PM	#9
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,587	What are the nature of the modifications to the ETA movement? I agree a deployant clasp is far superior and should have been included as standard with this watch. Tang is fine, I guess. I prefer the black dial version. What is the deal with the blue dial version? __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

19 April 2018, 01:12 AM	#17
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,241	I thought the mark 18 used a Sellita movement? __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

19 July 2018, 06:38 PM	#20
Jack T "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Jack Location: The Triangle Watch: Several Posts: 6,719	Good review, and great follow up postings. The finer points on the movement, the date window placement, lume, all details I hadn’t considered. A very fine watch, like the blue dial. __________________ Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT

28 July 2017, 07:45 AM	#2
Halothane 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: Anonymous Location: location location Watch: Rolex, Patek Posts: 2,372	Very nice. I like the Mark XVIII.

29 July 2017, 08:39 AM	#4
Squalex "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Canada Watch: Pam 510 Posts: 53	Great review, really liking this piece! How's the lume?

13 August 2017, 02:17 AM	#5
sierra11b "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Eric Location: California Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50 Posts: 1,966	Loved my black one enough to buy the white one too. It's the perfect size. Lume is just okay.

15 August 2017, 07:07 AM	#7
Roly25 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2017 Location: MY Metro Area Watch: Rolex Milgauss, Posts: 233	Thanks guys!

30 October 2017, 01:52 AM	#8
bondtoys "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: World Watch: 16750 Posts: 2,733	Imo, you could have gotten a bit deeper into the topic. Example: negative would be the very small amount of lume on the dial You should also mention how intensively IWC modified the 2892-2calibre. Just wind the crown or listen to the rotor noise and you are getting an idea how much work went into making this calibre an IWC movement.

31 October 2017, 03:57 PM	#11
Star Ferry Banned Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: down by the river Posts: 4,926	the blue sunburst is nice. it does lack a color-matched date wheel, which highlights the odd date placement

6 November 2017, 11:16 AM	#13
Runfar "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Colorado Posts: 349	excellent review- love that watch

18 March 2018, 02:51 AM	#14
Steph-paul "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: Northeast Posts: 454	Great video, thank you very much for your work.

15 April 2018, 10:55 PM	#15
mad_1974 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: Atlanta, GA Watch: Rolex,JLC,GS,Omega Posts: 166	Nice video; well done. I have the blue dial mark XVIII, and I really like the legibility, the look, the dial contrast. I'm good with the white date wheel, and the white stitching on the strap. The strap overall is great quality. The dial could use more lume, not a deal breaker. I'm not sure how much better the dial would look with the date window closer to the 3 o'clock position. Probably better, like the Mark XVI. The ETA base movement is not a big deal to me at this price point. To me, this watch was a wearable compromise for the Big Pilot, a watch I've looked at for years. I can't get over the wearability of a big watch that sits that high on the wrist; cost and re-sale being another. I've always liked IWC; this is my 3rd one (Aquatimer 2000 and 3714 being the others). This felt like to next logical step, and the negatives are minimal - date window placement and lack of lume at all the hour hash marks.

17 April 2018, 03:56 AM	#16
Syed117 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Syed Location: The Ether Posts: 3,388	I really want to love it, but that date window should be a little more to the right. I can't help but focus on it...

15 May 2018, 12:49 AM	#18
otherminds 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: NYC, NY Posts: 89	lovely review. I think the black dial would by my choice.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)