ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
25 August 2018, 05:27 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
|
Anymore input from people who are familiar with one or both models?
|
28 August 2018, 12:56 PM | #2 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,183
|
Explorer 114270 VS. OP 36mm 'Explorer dial'
Quote:
Had both 114270 and OP 116000 with mercedes hands; from those 2 the OP is a better choice Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
25 August 2018, 08:44 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
|
I'm definitely leaning that way at the moment.
|
25 August 2018, 10:24 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
|
I think i'll go with the OP now and see if Rolex will release a new Explorer in a smaller case size at any point and get that one too sometime down the road for a 2 piece Rolex collection.
|
25 August 2018, 11:47 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: DC Metro
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 384
|
Good choice. OP would be my vote as well
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex SubC 116610LN |
25 August 2018, 11:53 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
|
Thanks Mas12
|
26 August 2018, 02:09 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 629
|
OP all day, every day
|
26 August 2018, 08:52 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
|
Thanks for your input. I was expecting more love for the Explorer to be honest considering the amount of praise I read for this reference!
|
26 August 2018, 01:05 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4
|
Tough call between the two.
I decided on the Blue OP, which I purchased new recently with the 3,6,9 Arabic dial. |
27 August 2018, 08:50 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
|
Quote:
Going new is very tempting and a fresh start to make memories with the watch, rather than a used 114270 and with the modern upgrades seems like the way to go. |
|
27 August 2018, 09:19 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
|
|
28 August 2018, 02:24 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CA
Watch: Rolex 114270
Posts: 120
|
I was on the same scenario recently and went with the 114270 from 2008.
New enough for me and with Rolex Rehault it adds a modern touch. If you are buying the OP 36mm 3,6,9 dial because you wanted an Explorer than you will always wish you had the Explorer. bigC |
28 August 2018, 02:59 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
|
Quote:
The upgrades on a new OP are hard to ignore. The blue dial is awesome too, it's the Explorers horological father and has done a great deal of 'exploring' itself. Do you think there will ever be 2 sizes in the Explorer line? |
|
29 August 2018, 01:04 AM | #14 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CA
Watch: Rolex 114270
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
My old 14270 Explorer ( I have 114270 now) I had waterproof service done to it, which they replaced all the seals and the crown and water tested it at 10 BAR. After that I wore it swimming often, wore it while working on the yard, and even while doing some house upgrades using power tools. Yet in about a 6 month of wearing it daily it kept time perfectly and I did not adjust it at all. I live in a Farm but work in an office so I need something for both environments. Tuff enough for the farm life but nice enough to wear with my collar shirts. The White Dial OP is very nice too. Even the indices variant with no numerals is awesome. I myself will pick up the indices variant Used at some point. bigC |
|
28 August 2018, 03:09 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,253
|
I love this...
OP white dial... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
28 August 2018, 04:16 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Paul
Location: Colorado
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,543
|
|
28 August 2018, 03:21 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
The Smiths of Hilary . Enviado desde mi SM-G930F mediante Tapatalk |
28 August 2018, 03:31 AM | #18 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: here
Watch: 214270 Mk1
Posts: 924
|
I'm biased, but I think the 36mm Explorer has the best design and proportion of all Rolexes...
|
28 August 2018, 08:10 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: GMT-7
Posts: 90
|
Rolex choice
|
28 August 2018, 04:01 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Paul
Location: Colorado
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,543
|
Of the two, I would go for the OP only because it’s new, has a better warranty and you can be more confident going in the water without the need of having RSC check gaskets. But I’d go with a new Explorer 39 hands down over a new OP 36. In fact, I did. But you buy what you need. If I was a diver, I’d buy a sub, if I was a world traveler, I’d buy a GMT, If I collected cars or raced them, I’d buy a Daytona. If I wore a suit every day I’d probably wear a DD. I do a lot of hiking and exploring in the Western US, so I wear an Explorer. Plus, I think it’s the best looking watch they make with a classic, minimalist, but sporty look.
Whichever you choose, you’ll end up with a great watch. |
28 August 2018, 04:02 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: USA
Watch: 114270 & 116710LN
Posts: 107
|
OP, have you tried the 39mm Explorer?
Seems your wrist is a flat 6.5mm and might be fine proportion-wise. I owned the 114270 and have 6.5” wrists as well, though rounded so the 214270 didn’t work for me. If not the 39mm Explorer, I would recommend the blue OP 36. I traded in my 114270 for the 2018 white OP 34 myself. I feel the current generation OP makes it a solid upgrade.
__________________
♛ Rolex GMT-Master II 116710LN ♛ Rolex Explorer II 16570 |
28 August 2018, 10:43 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
|
Quote:
Still leaning towards a new OP at the moment, however the decision is still quite up in the air. I have tried on a 39mm Explorer and the difference in weight and feel with the 36 is definitely substantial. One of a few reasons i'm selling my IWC pilot (39mm) is the idea of moving to a slightly smaller case size might be better as a daily wearer for me. What do ya think? |
|
28 August 2018, 04:23 AM | #23 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,297
|
I vote for the explorer, I have the114270 model, it’s my every day go to watch, the desert island watch for me!
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
28 August 2018, 05:24 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 160
|
I love the explorer
|
28 August 2018, 05:41 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
I have the 39mm Explorer, short hands and WG numerals and I love it, reliable, durable and discreet. That said, the 36mm OP is also a favorite of mine, and of the two you are considering, my preference. The updated bracelet, clasp, the nicer dial and...it's brand new.
Good luck.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
28 August 2018, 10:46 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: nyc
Posts: 34
|
The 39 Ex looks too big on your wrist.
The 36 Ex looks best. White dial is not my pick for best all-rounder, it's an add-on to a collection. One watch for everyday GADA? The 36 Ex |
28 August 2018, 11:17 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
|
|
28 August 2018, 11:24 AM | #28 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: nyc
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
Also, if that's the way you feel, sounds like you already answered your own question - along w/ the "history" thread You're rooting for the OP, so why is the Ex in the race? Just get the OP and be done w/ it |
|
28 August 2018, 11:58 AM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
|
Quote:
I love both. I'm not rooting for the OP, but I can't be blind to the newer updates. Many people in this thread seem to think they are worth it. I have said before that if there were a new EX 36 I would get that, that's what makes this decision a V difficult one. If the Explorer was the new watch and OP a used one, it would be a no brainer for the Exp. As i'm leaning slightly more to the OP, focusing on its merits for example in the 'history thread' is a good way to justify the decision. Do people swim and do rigorous activities with their 20+ year old Rolex and don't necessarily have to worry? |
|
28 August 2018, 12:07 PM | #30 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: USA
Watch: 114270 & 116710LN
Posts: 107
|
Explorer 114270 VS. OP 36mm 'Explorer dial'
Quote:
Quote:
Having said that, the updates in the 214270 or current generation OP does make it feel substantial and “modern”. For me, the new bracelet and clasp is worth the “upgrade” compared to the 114270. The older bracelet is by no means not secure etc, just didn’t have the heft I associate with the current gen Rolex references like the 116710LN (which I got after the 114270). You’ll just have to decide what’s worth it for you. Good luck!
__________________
♛ Rolex GMT-Master II 116710LN ♛ Rolex Explorer II 16570 |
||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.