ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 November 2018, 07:46 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Bucuresti
Watch: a Rolex duo
Posts: 1,995
|
Smart decision
|
12 November 2018, 08:18 AM | #32 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Yesssssss...!
|
12 November 2018, 09:01 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Netherlands/Spain
Watch: Sea-Dweller 116600
Posts: 1,030
|
Oh yes!
You will see way less people wearing the same watch (for what that is worth). The thinner lugs, no cyclops and of course it keeps working when you dive deeper than 1000ft, which you probably will do as often as I do with mine, lol!
__________________
Rolex.c6 Sea-Dweller 4000 SD4K Ref. 116600 |
12 November 2018, 10:47 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: California
Posts: 25
|
If you’re out of pocket $9k or less for the SD4k, definitely worth it in my mind!
|
12 November 2018, 12:18 PM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,055
|
Quote:
|
|
12 November 2018, 01:28 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
|
Skip the SD4k and go for the SD43. If that’s what you want anyways, you’ll save yourself some money from flipping.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 8 (0 members and 8 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.