ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Andad · 20 June 2007, 08:20 PM

This is what owning a Rolex is all about.

dfn8tly · 21 June 2007, 01:50 AM

Outstanding watch and excellent refurbishment.

Wear it with pride and enjoy it's beauty.

Congratulations!

ianmedium · 27 June 2007, 12:21 AM

I have a couple of vintage watches, the oldest, this one is 61 years old and still going strong! With proper maintainence and the mantra "thou shalt not get it wet"!! it will out live me!! Hmm, I suppose I should get round to having kids so I can leave it to someone!!

This is the '46 cal 30.10 RA bumper movement, there is a little wear on the movement but it is cosmetic. this particualr movement is a little delicate so this watch goes on tour on sunny days! It does keep excellent time though, loses about a minute a week! Hope I can say the same of myself when I am 60!!:)))

Uncle-AJ · 27 June 2007, 01:47 AM

That's a great refurbishment job and I think the money was well spent.

Frank Long · 5 December 2008, 06:23 AM

I have a circa 1984-5 Submariner that was hardly ever used; worn maybe 10-20 times while going out to dinner, stuff like that. My dad bought it for me for my birthday one year when I was doing underwater salvage, but I wasn't going to trash it in that environment with all the hammers flying and slimy wreck snot. For that I had a cheapo $40 Casio that had functioned to 210 feet, so why trash the Rolex?

Problem was that when I went to pull out the watch after having not used it for a number of years, the hands were corroded and snagging on each other. I took it into a dealer, who said that it was caused by corrosion from a worn out/deteriorated seal. So my question is this ....... if this watch was hardly ever used and suffers that much from sitting in a drawer, how could anyone rely on the damn thing in a salt water environment? If seen hydraulic seals last longer than that in much heavier usage. Now they want $730 to replace two hands and certify the unit.

What gives? The jeweler says that the movement is in perfect condition but if this is what owning a Rolex is about, I'll forgo the marginal status elevation and use it for target practice. What a ripoff.

Iron Dealer 1 · 5 December 2008, 07:10 AM

Congrats on a fine family heirloom! I have an SD that is now 30 years old, running fine with 3 services, and I anticipate handing it off to my oldest son, who is a US NAVY LT SUBMARINER! Get all the stories you can from your Dad. As they say, it will be priceless!

YuppieKid · 5 December 2008, 09:47 AM

You're lucky that you were able to get a dial.

esm · 6 December 2008, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RLXGMT-1675

wow... that is amazing! congrates on a "brand new" GMT

dkpw · 6 December 2008, 02:15 AM

RLXGMT-1675what a lovely GMT and well done on having it so sympathetically refurbished. The star of this thread for me though, is Mike's Red Sub which served in Vietnam. That history, with it's beauty and accuracy mean that Mike should NEVER invite me round to his house!

Outstanding.

oneillba · 6 December 2008, 02:20 AM

Great looking watch -- it looks like new now. Enjoy your heirloom.

DSJ · 6 December 2008, 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank Long

I have a circa 1984-5 Submariner that was hardly ever used; worn maybe 10-20 times while going out to dinner, stuff like that. My dad bought it for me for my birthday one year when I was doing underwater salvage, but I wasn't going to trash it in that environment with all the hammers flying and slimy wreck snot. For that I had a cheapo $40 Casio that had functioned to 210 feet, so why trash the Rolex?

Problem was that when I went to pull out the watch after having not used it for a number of years, the hands were corroded and snagging on each other. I took it into a dealer, who said that it was caused by corrosion from a worn out/deteriorated seal. So my question is this ....... if this watch was hardly ever used and suffers that much from sitting in a drawer, how could anyone rely on the damn thing in a salt water environment? If seen hydraulic seals last longer than that in much heavier usage. Now they want $730 to replace two hands and certify the unit.

What gives? The jeweler says that the movement is in perfect condition but if this is what owning a Rolex is about, I'll forgo the marginal status elevation and use it for target practice. What a ripoff.

Frank, this post would likely get better coverage if you started your own thread about it, and especially if you included photos.

B. Doggy · 8 December 2008, 08:28 AM

Looks brand new to me

ttannert · 8 December 2008, 10:18 AM

Great pics of a great GMT!!!

Dr.B · 15 December 2008, 02:03 PM

Beautiful....
Nice to see it back alive.

yajeeps · 15 December 2008, 03:17 PM

Well done. Enjoy and mabuhay:)

Latrodectus · 16 December 2008, 01:55 AM

I love this watch

Big congratulations to you. I would have done the same

werc1 · 22 December 2008, 11:12 AM

wow, amazing how these things stand the test of time

20 June 2007, 08:20 PM	#31
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,510	This is what owning a Rolex is all about. __________________ E

27 June 2007, 01:47 AM	#34
Uncle-AJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Real Name: Adrian Location: Bolton, UK. Watch: Daytona 116520 Posts: 6,844	That's a great refurbishment job and I think the money was well spent. __________________ A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.........Segal's Law Member #10

5 December 2008, 07:10 AM	#36
Iron Dealer 1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Red Bank Watch: 1977 M1680 SSSD Posts: 353	Congrats on a fine family heirloom! I have an SD that is now 30 years old, running fine with 3 services, and I anticipate handing it off to my oldest son, who is a US NAVY LT SUBMARINER! Get all the stories you can from your Dad. As they say, it will be priceless! __________________ IRON DEALER 1 M16613 TT BLK SUB , M1680 SS SUB M1675 TT BLK GMT GO ARMY! BEAT NAVY!

5 December 2008, 09:47 AM	#37
YuppieKid "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Brandon Location: West Coast, US Posts: 1,079	Drool! You're lucky that you were able to get a dial. __________________ Brandon

6 December 2008, 02:15 AM	#39
dkpw "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: David Location: Scotland Watch: 16610 & 214270 Posts: 1,294	RLXGMT-1675what a lovely GMT and well done on having it so sympathetically refurbished. The star of this thread for me though, is Mike's Red Sub which served in Vietnam. That history, with it's beauty and accuracy mean that Mike should NEVER invite me round to his house! Outstanding. __________________ Sub 16610, Explorer 214270, Ω Speedy Pro & many others. David

21 June 2007, 01:50 AM	#32
dfn8tly Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Richard Location: The Villages, FL Watch: GMT-II Posts: 396	Outstanding watch and excellent refurbishment. Wear it with pride and enjoy it's beauty. Congratulations!

5 December 2008, 06:23 AM	#35
Frank Long "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Half Moon Bay Posts: 1	I have a circa 1984-5 Submariner that was hardly ever used; worn maybe 10-20 times while going out to dinner, stuff like that. My dad bought it for me for my birthday one year when I was doing underwater salvage, but I wasn't going to trash it in that environment with all the hammers flying and slimy wreck snot. For that I had a cheapo $40 Casio that had functioned to 210 feet, so why trash the Rolex? Problem was that when I went to pull out the watch after having not used it for a number of years, the hands were corroded and snagging on each other. I took it into a dealer, who said that it was caused by corrosion from a worn out/deteriorated seal. So my question is this ....... if this watch was hardly ever used and suffers that much from sitting in a drawer, how could anyone rely on the damn thing in a salt water environment? If seen hydraulic seals last longer than that in much heavier usage. Now they want $730 to replace two hands and certify the unit. What gives? The jeweler says that the movement is in perfect condition but if this is what owning a Rolex is about, I'll forgo the marginal status elevation and use it for target practice. What a ripoff.

6 December 2008, 02:20 AM	#40
oneillba "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Brian Location: Hamilton, MI USA Watch: My beloved TT DJ Posts: 3,831	Great looking watch -- it looks like new now. Enjoy your heirloom. __________________ My Trusty TT DJ

8 December 2008, 08:28 AM	#42
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	Looks brand new to me

8 December 2008, 10:18 AM	#43
ttannert "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Tim Location: Ohio Watch: SS Black Daytona Posts: 872	Great pics of a great GMT!!! __________________ The greatest luxury in life is time; treasure every second. __________________ My Collection: SS Rolex M Black Daytona SS Rolex V Black Milgauss GV SS Rolex M Black Milgauss TT Rolex Z White MOP Datejust SS Rolex M Coke GMT II SS Tag Heuer Black Kirium Chronometer

15 December 2008, 02:03 PM	#44
Dr.B "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Fernando Location: North Carolina Watch: SS White Daytona Posts: 1,944	Beautiful.... Nice to see it back alive.

15 December 2008, 03:17 PM	#45
yajeeps Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: USA Posts: 30	Well done. Enjoy and mabuhay:)

16 December 2008, 01:55 AM	#46
Latrodectus 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Fred Location: KY, USA Watch: GMT-Master II Posts: 10,042	I love this watch Big congratulations to you. I would have done the same __________________ Member # 16057 4-Hands Club Tosser Club Member TRF Skypers Group

22 December 2008, 11:12 AM	#47
werc1 Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Manhattan Posts: 22	wow, amazing how these things stand the test of time

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)