ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 November 2018, 03:51 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Oyster perpetual date vs datejust
Am I missing something here? Other then the bracelet what would be the biggest difference in buying these 2 models? If I wanted a 39mm oyster band smooth bezel without the pcls for thousands less then the DJ what would stop me? I know fluted and jubilee but for this point let’s compare it to the DJ41 smooth and oyster for considerably less money. Am I missing something? I honestly didn’t even know a oyster perpetual can come with a date. I always thought It was more of an entry level watch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
10 November 2018, 06:18 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 185
|
The oyster perpetual does not have a date, that the main difference...
The DJ has polished steel oyster bracelet, while the OP has brushed steel (better looking IMO). The DJ has a wider and flatter bezel, while the OP has a slight thinner and domed bell. I would personally go with OP. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
10 November 2018, 06:29 PM | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Quote:
I thought that too but it seems as though they are putting dates on some oyster perpetuals? I’m confused and not sure one is worth 3k more then the other? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
10 November 2018, 07:05 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
After doing a little research I think the biggest oyster with date they make is 34mm? Do they make a 39mm with date?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
10 November 2018, 08:47 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
|
Oyster Perpetual Date 34mm. Datejust 28, 31, 36 and now 41 I think.
__________________
@imrootbeer7 |
11 November 2018, 03:11 AM | #6 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Nothing stops you. The Datejust offers more options and dials, more than any other model.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
11 November 2018, 04:54 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Quote:
I didn’t know the 39 didn’t come with a date. And the DJ41 being a 39.5 watch. If I was looking for a smooth with oyster band and date why wouldn’t you go with the OP date over the datejust. But the biggest OP with date is 34mm. Now get your wife the OP over the DJ36 and save 3k. And it will for her better if she has smaller wrist. ;) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
11 November 2018, 04:54 AM | #8 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Aaron
Location: WA
Posts: 840
|
OP date is 34mm... DJ is 36 or 41.... if you can rock a 34mm I would take an OP date for sure
|
11 November 2018, 01:56 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mark P
Location: Toronto
Watch: SS Wimbledon DJ41
Posts: 2,046
|
Some great info here.
IMO - the 34mm OP Date is too small. I've tried it on and it doesn't work for me. The 39mm is okay, but a little plain. I really liked the DJ41 which is the nicest Rolex I've ever owned. (I've had about 5 over the last 30 years.) Go try em all on, compare and even go back a few times to be sure. You'll find the one that sings to you, price not withstanding. Good luck, Mark Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk |
12 November 2018, 04:51 PM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Quote:
Thanks. I was just curious about the OP date because I am a DJ fan. Couldn’t see a reason to buy a DJ smooth oyster if you could get the OP date and save a few grand. But Being the biggest size is a 34 I guess they realized if they made a 39mm OP date it would eat into the DJ sales. That being said I bought the DJ41 black fluted jubilee with sticks. I loved it. It just wore too small for me as a every day watch. Not a huge Sports model fan. I flipped it for a DJ ll diamond dial rhodium oyster and couldn’t be happier. If the DJ41 wore just a little bigger I would have kept it forever. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
13 November 2018, 08:41 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mark P
Location: Toronto
Watch: SS Wimbledon DJ41
Posts: 2,046
|
Quote:
Wear your watch in good health. Mark. Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk |
|
13 November 2018, 08:59 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
Call me crazy, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say the seller who posted that as an "oyseter perpetual" got the size wrong. Is there a model number associated with that screen cap? As far as I am aware, the OP Dates stop at 34mm, and are actually listed on the Rolex website under the DJ line. The stand-alone OPs are non-date designs.
|
13 November 2018, 09:29 AM | #13 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Quote:
I agree with you. I think this is a 34mm and the person posted it as a 39mm which got me confused. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
13 November 2018, 09:45 AM | #14 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Oyster perpetual date vs datejust
Quote:
I agree that the DJ41 is the better watch. And I wanted to love it. But it just wore too small for my wrist. The DJll fits better. Is heavier I love the bigger bezel. Knowing all that I still bought the DJ41. Just didn’t wear like I wanted it too. So at the end of the day I gave the DJll a chance and it’s perfect for me. I almost got the DJll Wimbledon 2 tone. But decided on the stainless diamond dial. Wasn’t a fan of the Battons being so fat. So romans or diamond dial for me. I can tell you with the larger bezel the diamond dial really pops. Wouldn’t get diamonds on the DJ41 as the battons on that model are very nice. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
13 November 2018, 09:55 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
That diamond rhodium DJII is an awesome model. It's the one DJII model that I thought hung together proportionally. I think I would prefer that to the equivalent model in the DJ41. With stick indexes, though, it's DJ41 all the way.
|
13 November 2018, 10:02 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
115200 is the reference. It's 34mm with a 19mm bracelet.
|
13 November 2018, 12:38 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 2
|
Correct - it is 34mm. Here's my silver one. Sort of halfway between an OP and a DJ, with the size of the OP34 but look and feel of a smooth-bezel Datejust.
|
13 November 2018, 02:59 PM | #18 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Quote:
Awesome watch. If I had the wrist I would definitely get the one you have. Wear in good health. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
13 November 2018, 03:02 PM | #19 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Quote:
I love the rhodium stick dial with fluted and jubilee. Or oyster with smooth. Actually it’s the only DJ I like with smooth and jubilee. To me that’s my favorite Rolex DJ. But since I can’t wear it since it wears small on my wrist I went with the rhodium diamond DJll which is my favorite DJll. I envy those who can pull off the DJ41. Who knew just a couple of mm would make such a difference. That and I love the bigger fluted bezel. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
13 November 2018, 03:06 PM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
That is a good looking watch. I prefer it to the DJ36 to be honest knowing I saved a few grand. Those with smaller wrist have all the fun in the watch world. 34-40mm would be better then my 41-43 preference. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
13 November 2018, 03:27 PM | #21 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,692
|
Quote:
|
|
13 November 2018, 04:00 PM | #22 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Oyster perpetual date vs datejust
Quote:
Yeah. I tried the DJ41 but most of the people on this forum said it looked like a 36mm on my wrist. So if a 39.5 wears small there is no way I could pull off a 34mm watch. But I think it looks amazing. The DJll (41.2mm) fits me like a glove. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
14 November 2018, 01:53 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
Quote:
Think this goes back to when 34mm was still a mans watch. So this was considered the cheaper alternative to the DJ, but they didn't want to give it the DJ name to encourage people to buy the more expensive one. That's my guess at least. |
|
14 November 2018, 04:35 AM | #24 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Quote:
I wonder if they made the OP 39 date how much would that cut into the DJ41 sales? I prefer the domed bezel over the smooth as well. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
14 November 2018, 04:50 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
I believe you can get a DJ41 with the smooth bezel.
|
14 November 2018, 07:15 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
|
27 November 2018, 12:55 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Charlotte nc
Posts: 76
|
When did production stop for the 34mm date?
|
27 November 2018, 01:51 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.