ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Iulian.Butum · 28 November 2018, 07:48 PM

Good morning to all,I was wondering why Rolex choose to use that shiny black Rado tipe ceramic and not the black mate they use on Yacht-Master?!I believe it would look much more professional tool .And if Rolex would change it one day , what you guys think will happend with the current shiny references, gain or lose appreciation ?Personaly I can deal with the fat lugs but not with the shiny bezel .

Onikage · 28 November 2018, 07:53 PM

I can't deal with the inexplicable lugs or needless slab case (housing a similar movement to previous sleek version). Shiny ceramic I'm neutral on. Matte would be okay with me too.

HogwldFLTR · 28 November 2018, 08:03 PM

I tend to agree with you. That is one of the reason I really like my 116600. The last 40mm Sea Dweller. The minute marks on the bezel insert really cut the reflection making a lot less shiny. It also has the older style case. It's a perfect watch imho.

Glidelock · 28 November 2018, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR

I tend to agree with you. That is one of the reason I really like my 116600. The last 40mm Sea Dweller. The minute marks on the bezel insert really cut the reflection making a lot less shiny. It also has the older style case. It's a perfect watch imho.

Agree 100%

Now here’s a thought on the 116610 Sub: Let’s start off by silhouetting the maxi case and adding back in those sexy Chamfers!

Next, Matte out the ceramic bezels the way LA Watch Werks has done for a few of the members here and BOOM!

It looks amazingly sleek and sexy and rugged all all at the same time. The way a Sub should look!

joli160 · 28 November 2018, 08:14 PM

Because it's not so much a tool as jewellery

Onikage · 28 November 2018, 08:16 PM

Uh oh. It's gone tool jewellery already.

28 November 2018, 07:48 PM	#1
Iulian.Butum "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: România Posts: 75	Shiny ceramic insert Good morning to all,I was wondering why Rolex choose to use that shiny black Rado tipe ceramic and not the black mate they use on Yacht-Master?!I believe it would look much more professional tool .And if Rolex would change it one day , what you guys think will happend with the current shiny references, gain or lose appreciation ?Personaly I can deal with the fat lugs but not with the shiny bezel .

28 November 2018, 07:53 PM	#2
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	I can't deal with the inexplicable lugs or needless slab case (housing a similar movement to previous sleek version). Shiny ceramic I'm neutral on. Matte would be okay with me too. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

28 November 2018, 08:03 PM	#3
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,692	I tend to agree with you. That is one of the reason I really like my 116600. The last 40mm Sea Dweller. The minute marks on the bezel insert really cut the reflection making a lot less shiny. It also has the older style case. It's a perfect watch imho. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

28 November 2018, 08:14 PM	#5
joli160 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: NL Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 14,757	Because it's not so much a tool as jewellery __________________ Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.

28 November 2018, 08:16 PM	#6
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	Uh oh. It's gone tool jewellery already. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)