ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JUSTIFIED · 13 December 2018, 11:02 AM

Many have asked just how much wider the 126660 is at the end link than the 116660. Here is a visual comparison of the two (126660 on RHS). The 126660's end link is roughly .5 mm wider.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zq3OC0cx_Ss (@ 16:19).

Rashid.bk · 13 December 2018, 03:51 PM

Wouldn't it be just simply 1mm wider since it went from 21 to 22 mm. The bracelet and end link are the same width at that point.
I'm asking, not making a counter point.

Devildog · 13 December 2018, 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rashid.bk

Wouldn't it be just simply 1mm wider since it went from 21 to 22 mm. The bracelet and end link are the same width at that point.
I'm asking, not making a counter point.

Yes indeed.

Too many people over think these things.

Old. 21 mm. New 22 mm. It’s

13 December 2018, 11:02 AM	#1
JUSTIFIED "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: Texas Watch: RG Daytona Posts: 716	Visual - DSSD Width - 1166660 vs 126660 Many have asked just how much wider the 126660 is at the end link than the 116660. Here is a visual comparison of the two (126660 on RHS). The 126660's end link is roughly .5 mm wider. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zq3OC0cx_Ss (@ 16:19). Attached Images __________________ "Change the way you look at things and the things you look at change" Wayne Dyer

13 December 2018, 03:51 PM	#2
Rashid.bk "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Dallas Watch: 12800ft = 3900m Posts: 11,173	Wouldn't it be just simply 1mm wider since it went from 21 to 22 mm. The bracelet and end link are the same width at that point. I'm asking, not making a counter point.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)