ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 October 2018, 07:15 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Henry
Location: Miami
Posts: 27
|
Can I get help with this 16030
the watch in discussion here is supposedly a datejust reference 16030, of course the dial has been changed or its fake and the datewheel seems off to me, just wanting seek more expert opinion. Thank you before hand.
Henry Last edited by handr008; 26 October 2018 at 07:40 AM.. Reason: add images |
26 October 2018, 04:55 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Can I get help with this 16030
It is not fake, dial off a newer model, band could be fake
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
26 October 2018, 10:14 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Henry
Location: Miami
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
thanks for the reply, look at the R though, it looks pretty off to me, very thick. I Dont know, I was going to purchase because he has it at a very good price but something tells me its wrong. |
|
26 October 2018, 10:43 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 66
|
I found the listing in ebay. It is described as a „16030 with 116200 hour marks and sunburst dial“. So definitely a franken watch if not worse. Are you the buyer?
|
26 October 2018, 10:49 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Henry
Location: Miami
Posts: 27
|
I did purchase it yesterday without paying attention to the small details because i do know the watch buyer's group and at the price ($2300) it was a very good deal with today's market, but as I looked closely at the watch after i made the purchase I immediately asked for the order to get cancelled, which the seller did and I got a full refund already, so no harm. But there is definitely something wrong with this watch. Thanks for the reply!
|
28 October 2018, 04:23 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,343
|
Ill advised to buy something that is obviously whack and then start doing the due diligence!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 October 2018, 04:28 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Henry
Location: Miami
Posts: 27
|
|
29 October 2018, 03:25 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Michael H
Posts: 964
|
the watch head looks good, but does look like aftermarket steel bracelet. Prob not a fraken-watch the date disc does sit like that at times on the caliber 3035. Likely just a newer dial on older movement. have it inspected after purchase. you have 180 day dispute window if there are any issues.
|
29 October 2018, 03:32 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: Casio Illuminator
Posts: 650
|
Quote:
__________________
An expert under pressure is a drip. |
|
29 October 2018, 03:44 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Henry
Location: Miami
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
|
|
29 October 2018, 03:52 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Henry
Location: Miami
Posts: 27
|
Defenitely agree and it is usually how i proceed I usually buy my watches from John Batista who is very reputable seller down here in South Florida but usually only sell NIB or atleast newer models, ive been looking for an older datejust because i got one stolen from me a couple years ago but with the crazy prices we all know about it has not been possible. I usually never proceed to buy something like that. It was a mistake of my part clearly, thankfully i did get my money back immmediately.
|
20 December 2018, 08:48 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: London
Posts: 2
|
I have a 16030. The watch itself looks genuine to me (although my dial is different to the photo). The bracelet looks like an aftermarket bracelet though.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.