The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31 January 2009, 04:36 AM   #1
Mirx
"TRF" Member
 
Mirx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Watch: RLX
Posts: 437
Old GMT II Master/Explorer II clasps

I understand that the some older models of GMT II Master's and Explorer II's would come on an Oyster Fliplock bracelet with a divers extension link. Even some 1655 'Steve McQueen's" have it.

What was the purpose for fitting these watches with a divers extension link?
Mirx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2009, 05:01 AM   #2
Wolfgang427
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Wolfgang427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirx View Post
I understand that the some older models of GMT II Master's and Explorer II's would come on an Oyster Fliplock bracelet with a divers extension link. Even some 1655 'Steve McQueen's" have it.

What was the purpose for fitting these watches with a divers extension link?
It was an option(extra-cost) from Rolex directly. The purpose would be that the end users wanted to use it as a divers watch, even though it wasn't a Sub or SD.
Wolfgang427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2009, 05:18 AM   #3
Mirx
"TRF" Member
 
Mirx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Watch: RLX
Posts: 437
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfgang427 View Post
The purpose would be that the end users wanted to use it as a divers watch, even though it wasn't a Sub or SD.
Seems like they would make pretty lousy divers. Both have non-diver bezel markings as well as one is with fixed and the other with both-directional moving bezel.

Looks like it would be an effort to both, read it and trust it while diving.
Mirx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2009, 05:23 AM   #4
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
The extension link is so you can wear your watch over a flight suit, wet suit, or cold weather sleeves in the case of the Explorer (it gets cold in those caves)...

Having an extension link doesn't make a watch a "dive" watch, the depth rating does..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2009, 05:32 AM   #5
Mirx
"TRF" Member
 
Mirx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Watch: RLX
Posts: 437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
The extension link is so you can wear your watch over a flight suit, wet suit, or cold weather sleeves in the case of the Explorer (it gets cold in those caves)...

Having an extension link doesn't make a watch a "dive" watch, the depth rating does..

Now those are some practical applications Larry!

Rolex have replaced my standard Expy II Oyster with a diver extension model free of charge when I bought the watch so I can use it while surfing over my wetsuit, or in the winter, over the wetsuit and the gloves. It works a treat!

Thank you both for your replies.
Mirx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2009, 05:56 AM   #6
GeoGio Greece
"TRF" Member
 
GeoGio Greece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
The extension link is so you can wear your watch over a flight suit, wet suit, or cold weather sleeves in the case of the Explorer (it gets cold in those caves)...

Having an extension link doesn't make a watch a "dive" watch, the depth rating does..
+ 1. On top of that, a both-directional or not at all moving bezel does not make you a lousy diver. Your non existing skills do. Nor it would be an effort to read it and trust it while diving, up to 30 or so meters where I take my GMT every summer for the last 15 years.

Do not forget we are not talking about exploring Titanic and surrounding sea bed, but amateur free diving - no bottles / no air / no gases.

For this reason I installed from the first day an SD bracelet on my watch.
__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones.

DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series

Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series
GeoGio Greece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2009, 06:47 AM   #7
Wolfgang427
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Wolfgang427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoGio Greece View Post
+ 1. On top of that, a both-directional or not at all moving bezel does not make you a lousy diver. Your non existing skills do. Nor it would be an effort to read it and trust it while diving, up to 30 or so meters where I take my GMT every summer for the last 15 years.

Do not forget we are not talking about exploring Titanic and surrounding sea bed, but amateur free diving - no bottles / no air / no gases.

For this reason I installed from the first day an SD bracelet on my watch.
Agree, just because I said most end buyers would end up using it as a divers watch doesn't mean it automatically makes them(GMT-Exp II) a professional divers watch. Most Rolex owners, including the owners of Subs and SD never see more "diving" then the bath-tub or the beach at most. and even my Datejust can go much deeper underwater then my head or body would allow.
Wolfgang427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2009, 07:16 AM   #8
Spark
"TRF" Member
 
Spark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Mark
Location: U.K.
Watch: Too Many
Posts: 2,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfgang427 View Post
Agree, just because I said most end buyers would end up using it as a divers watch doesn't mean it automatically makes them(GMT-Exp II) a professional divers watch. Most Rolex owners, including the owners of Subs and SD never see more "diving" then the bath-tub or the beach at most. and even my Datejust can go much deeper underwater then my head or body would allow.


BEACH, You wouldn't catch my 1655 near that horrible scratchy silicon stuff
Spark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2009, 07:26 AM   #9
redshirt1957
"TRF" Member
 
redshirt1957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
How about it helped the 16700 sell in light of going head to head with the 16710 which did not come from Rolex with the flip lock bracelet. Just a thought. I always look at marketing first when it comes to questions of why retailers do certain things. Next I think about excess inventory. Then I might think about function.
redshirt1957 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.