ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 July 2019, 01:47 AM | #61 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Dallas,NY,Colo.
Watch: Patek 5168, 5170P
Posts: 2,545
|
Just travel more and you’ll need to reset your watch often enough that a few seconds won’t mean anything. Please also read up on precision versus accuracy.
|
11 July 2019, 02:03 AM | #62 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11 July 2019, 02:34 AM | #63 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,263
|
Quote:
Well OK. lol. My first inclination was to cite an Isuzu Trooper or a Land Rover Mk III. But in the interests of worldwide recognition I settled on the RR (which up until the mid 90s I’m sure was as bullet proof as any). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
11 July 2019, 02:40 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 354
|
As usual, the peanut gallery is adding so much value to the conversation.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 July 2019, 02:45 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,263
|
|
11 July 2019, 03:02 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,575
|
i'd only get it checked out if it was running +/- 15 secs
|
11 July 2019, 03:54 AM | #67 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
|
I understand expecting a brand new watch to perform to the advertised spec. That being said, if it's still +4 after taking the average in 5 positions, I'd just wear it as is. +4 is still pretty darn accurate (within COSC) and not worth the trouble of sending it for regulation, etc.
|
11 July 2019, 07:12 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: London
Watch: Various
Posts: 1,214
|
Just ran my Explorer through toolwatch.
What can I say. 100% - amazing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Have previously owned & own ♛GMT II Coke 16710♛ ♛DateJust 16030♛ ♛Explorer 214270 mk2♛ Submariner 116610LN♛ 126711CHNR ♛ |
11 July 2019, 08:55 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Alan
Location: Northern, CA
Watch: 116334
Posts: 2,215
|
Remember you have a five year warranty from Rolex. I would wear the watch and when not in use , keep on the winder then start logging the seconds lost or gained and if it isn't within the spec, then send it in.
__________________
Rolex 116334 126600 228235 |
11 July 2019, 09:36 AM | #70 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
|
|
11 July 2019, 09:38 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 216
|
I’d give it some time then if it’s no better send it in and hope they don’t mess it up.
|
11 July 2019, 10:01 AM | #72 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: AZ
Watch: a few
Posts: 1,068
|
|
11 July 2019, 10:45 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
I'm not sure there's much value for anyone to add at this point. Plain and simple nothing is wrong with the watch as told. It needs to be observed during a normal wearing cycle before anyone can add much input with any value to be able to say with confidence it needs an adjustment at RSC under warranty. The OP took the watch from the AD home immediately to the Lepsi, where the watch couldn't have been more than hand wound at best. To be +4 in that situation is hardly surprising nor is it an ideal test especially when comparing to watches worn in a rotation and on the regular. I really don't think it needs to be as complicated as we're making it, there's no false advertising
|
11 July 2019, 10:54 AM | #74 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: George
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 216570 Explorer II
Posts: 2,421
|
Wear it for a few weeks, will calm down. No worries.
|
11 July 2019, 02:13 PM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
|
My Sub was about +1.6 spd during the first week. Five years later, the same. More than 7 years later, still the same.
Yes! OP, wear it daily for a least weeks and then come back and post results. |
11 July 2019, 05:05 PM | #76 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
|
Quote:
That only adds another layer of complexity to the issue that has absolutely no bearing on reality. To the OP. Wear the watch as much as possible for a few months whilst keeping an eye on it's accuracy if you need to. But don't do anything about it until then. Also consider that if you send the watch in early, it may come back with some damage that may be unacceptable to you which could be more problematic. Remember there's 86 blah blah blah thousand seconds in a day and a few here or there is not going to stop the sun from coming up. Enjoy the watch |
|
11 July 2019, 08:34 PM | #77 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: London
Watch: Various
Posts: 1,214
|
Quote:
After 24 hours. Happy with that. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Have previously owned & own ♛GMT II Coke 16710♛ ♛DateJust 16030♛ ♛Explorer 214270 mk2♛ Submariner 116610LN♛ 126711CHNR ♛ |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.