ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mdtddd2007 · 11 February 2009, 10:11 AM

SS Daytona "Fat Hands" or "Skinny Hands"? Just wanna see which is more likeable and maybe one day more collectable?

bodybump · 11 February 2009, 10:18 AM

here is a similar thread my friend...how it helps..

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=67293

Art 1 · 11 February 2009, 10:19 AM

I prefer the thin hands. I have an F5 that has thin hands, that's about when the switch over was.

kcmo · 11 February 2009, 10:38 AM

I prefer the fat hands!

onkyo · 11 February 2009, 12:07 PM

Thin all the way....... along with a Zenith movement and you have the best timepiece ever!

BuffaloRolex · 11 February 2009, 12:18 PM

I prefer the fat hands.

Starwalker · 12 February 2009, 12:03 AM

i dont like my hands to look anorexic...

eparisini · 12 February 2009, 01:35 AM

First 116520 was thin dial/hands as hands were like 16520... then changed.
I think would be more collectible 116520 cream dial

rijowysock · 12 February 2009, 01:41 AM

i like fat hands, easier to see against dial

bodybump · 12 February 2009, 02:43 AM

Fat hands for me...

GeoGio Greece · 12 February 2009, 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bodybump

Fat hands for me...

+ 1, the most loveable hands.

11 February 2009, 10:11 AM	#1
mdtddd2007 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: U.S Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS Posts: 5,785	SS Daytona "Fat Hands" or "Skinny Hands"? SS Daytona "Fat Hands" or "Skinny Hands"? Just wanna see which is more likeable and maybe one day more collectable?

11 February 2009, 10:18 AM	#2
bodybump ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Oscar Location: Florida Watch: Me!!! Posts: 23,233	here is a similar thread my friend...how it helps.. http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=67293 __________________

12 February 2009, 12:03 AM	#7
Starwalker "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: aroundtheworld Watch: SS Daytona - BLACK Posts: 2,261	i dont like my hands to look anorexic... __________________ 116520 Black - 116500 White - 116713LN - 116613LB - Panerai 389 - Chopard Mille Miglia GMT Chronograph - Chopard LUC Sport 2000 - Moser Pioneer Centre Seconds

12 February 2009, 02:43 AM	#10
bodybump ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Oscar Location: Florida Watch: Me!!! Posts: 23,233	Fat hands for me... Attached Images __________________

11 February 2009, 10:19 AM	#3
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	I prefer the thin hands. I have an F5 that has thin hands, that's about when the switch over was.

11 February 2009, 10:38 AM	#4
kcmo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Karis Location: USA Posts: 19,377	I prefer the fat hands!

11 February 2009, 12:07 PM	#5
onkyo Banned Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Pav Location: Manhattan Posts: 11,495	Thin all the way....... along with a Zenith movement and you have the best timepiece ever!

11 February 2009, 12:18 PM	#6
BuffaloRolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Tony Location: Buffalo Watch: 16613 (blue dial) Posts: 1,329	I prefer the fat hands.

12 February 2009, 01:35 AM	#8
eparisini "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Emanuele Location: Italy Watch: 6263 FAP Posts: 795	First 116520 was thin dial/hands as hands were like 16520... then changed. I think would be more collectible 116520 cream dial

12 February 2009, 01:41 AM	#9
rijowysock "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Riley Location: 41.89° N, 87.62° Watch: URWERK Posts: 499	i like fat hands, easier to see against dial

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)