ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 August 2010, 03:52 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Joe
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,835
|
In my opinion, you alread have 2 really classic time pieces there. So if it was up to me, I would definitely NOT do it.
Cheers, Joe
__________________
"Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works." - S.J. |
20 August 2010, 04:33 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bård
Location: Oslo - Norway
Watch: None
Posts: 1,014
|
Flip ang get the GMT IIc
I would absoloutely flip them to get a new GMT IIc. I would flip them to get the new sub c too, but I prefer the GMT.
Better to have one you really love than two you are not completely satisfied with
__________________
Bård |
20 August 2010, 05:28 PM | #33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Arron
Location: phoenix, AZ
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 764
|
Quote:
I was satisfied with my SUB and GMT until recently. The GMTc has drawn me in with its new size and bracelet. The GMTc would be perfect for me if it had the DSSD clasp. I constantly adjust my clasp in the summer due to my wrist swelling. Sometimes I use the divers extensions as a quick way to wear my sub loose when it is hot.
__________________
1680, 1675, 116610LN, GMT Master II, Explorer II, Tudor Big Block 79170 |
|
21 August 2010, 08:12 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
no
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.