ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 May 2012, 03:29 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Watch: All the Oysters
Posts: 811
|
scusi! Meant that, typed the other.
|
8 May 2012, 03:32 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: planet
Posts: 1,517
|
42mm. They are too close to 41mm IMO.
__________________
Dream the impossible, and make it possible! |
8 May 2012, 04:26 AM | #33 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Probably why they went 44mm on ROO. I expect the next iteration of the Diver (after this carbon/ceramic model) will be 44mm.
|
8 May 2012, 07:07 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
15300 all day long
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
9 May 2012, 05:57 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 130
|
15202>15300>15400
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.