ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 May 2012, 01:17 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
|
hmmmmmm I am interested.
__________________
|
11 May 2012, 01:22 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Oh but it is. Roman numerals mixed with arabic, and a clear identity crisis as to what kind of watch it is. Sport or dress, who knows? Calender with a very crude looking indication of month and lack of day display. On top of that a GMT function? To each their own, but don't worry, Grady and Sam will soon come to your support
|
11 May 2012, 01:26 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
|
I think the real application for this as a tool watch would be for the surfing community. That said, the average surfer won't come close to being able to afford a watch by Rolex, but perhaps some will.
As far as these watches really being used for their utility: I am a Navy flight surgeon, I own a Breitling Navitimer and a Rolex Sub Date if anyone is going to get practical use out of their watches it would be me and I still only use them to check the time. I bought my watches for the same reasons the majority of expensive watches owner have: they look good. It is nice to have a watch you could argue helps you out in your day to day life but we all know that is seldom the case when that device costs 7K and up. I think I tide determining watch with water resistance and perhaps some depth resistance would be an interesting piece for the same reason people purchase Submariners now. It would also allow Rolex to take a more interesting and exotic approach to a new line (putting a green bezel on a black sub is about as nontraditional as the Sub is ever going to get). I for one think the Yatchmaster II is a different looking watch and if I had unlimited cash it would definitely make it into my top 5. As far as the Sky Dweller, I think it they did a good job with it. It would have been nice to have a Navitimer-esque flight computer (whiz wheel) on the bezel or something a little more practical (I actually have used mine). |
11 May 2012, 01:35 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
|
11 May 2012, 01:41 AM | #35 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
Quote:
keep mak'n 'em, someone'll buy 'em... |
|
11 May 2012, 01:44 AM | #36 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
|
Quote:
A tide indicator? Really, Rolex? I hope not.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
|
11 May 2012, 01:47 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
|
Great perspective!
Although, I think you would be surprised about how many surfers could afford a Rolex or some other haute timepiece but choose not to own one.
__________________
|
11 May 2012, 01:49 AM | #38 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: Ho
Posts: 679
|
|
11 May 2012, 01:52 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Mark
Location: Florida
Watch: 1803 and 16610
Posts: 170
|
Talk about complications
Here's my G-Shock "Gulfman". Actually a google picture of one like mine.
It has a moon phase function that I don't use, but the tide function is very useful for planning my day at the beach. Low tide; good for walks and riding my bicycle. High tide; good for surf fishing the outgoing and incoming slack. Even with the technology available in a digital, the closest point of reference in the database for an accurate tide could be a hundred miles away. But by checking the actual tide times, one can do a quick + or - 'mental' calibration that is easy to remember and quite accurate. Trying to do something similar in a mechanical watch would be quite a complication. |
11 May 2012, 02:03 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Sam
Location: Sunny Florida
Watch: Rolex 16013
Posts: 291
|
Maybe it'll be called The Daytona Beachmaster.
|
11 May 2012, 02:42 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 573
|
We might as well start - is it safe to wear my Beachmaster in the shower?
|
11 May 2012, 02:52 AM | #42 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
I'm a little skeptical about this one, but Rolex never ceases to surprise.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
11 May 2012, 03:14 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
|
11 May 2012, 03:16 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
cant really imagine how a mechanical tide-master going to look like..? the tide watches i've seen were all digital..
http://www.hautehorlogerie.org/en/ho...th-tide-gauge/ something like that..? |
11 May 2012, 03:20 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
|
11 May 2012, 03:25 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
Sounds intriguing. I hope Rolex will use this chance to introduce their first rubber strap watch
Another tip, if Rolex read this forum: release a red gold Submariner on a rubber strap. It would sell like hotcakes!
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
11 May 2012, 03:39 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,196
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.