The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 January 2018, 08:50 AM   #31
mps354
2024 Pledge Member
 
mps354's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 9,098
Did the same with my 16710, huge difference
mps354 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2018, 10:32 AM   #32
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by mps354 View Post
Did the same with my 16710, huge difference
Would love to see some pics, if you wouldn't care to share.
watchwatcher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2018, 12:27 PM   #33
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
I did the opposite. I bought an older NOS bracelet for my Tudor. Nothing is more comfortable than the old rivet and folded link bracelets.
Attached Images
   
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2020, 11:51 AM   #34
SconnieBT
"TRF" Member
 
SconnieBT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Watch: Omega 2504.52
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by fskywalker View Post
Nice upgrade. I did the same (97200) with my 16610, which fitted without modifications. I recently sold the glidelock, will not put an easylink (77200) on mine as the clasp is a little smaller and thus lighter and I don't dive with the watch anyway; already checked with the easylink band from my now gone Explorer 39mm and it fits like a glove too!
Are you saying the EZ link fit in the 16610 bracelet? or that the 39mm explorer bracelet fit on the 16610 case? Thanks for the clarification.
SconnieBT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2020, 11:58 AM   #35
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by SconnieBT View Post
Are you saying the EZ link fit in the 16610 bracelet? or that the 39mm explorer bracelet fit on the 16610 case? Thanks for the clarification.


Hi don’t own anymore the 77200 bracelet but think the complete clasp assembly can be fitted into the 93150 bracelet (same should apply to the 93250 as well). Both glidelock (97200) and easylink (77200) bracelets fit a sub 16610 as long as the case has the lip to hold the SEL (mine is an S series and even though came with the 93150 band can use 93250, 97200 and 77200 bands thanks to the lip on the case; not sure on what serial number does the case started to have it). Hope this helps


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2020, 04:24 AM   #36
msp1518
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: NC
Watch: Polar 16570 c.3186
Posts: 28
Resurrecting this thread. The one annoyance with my Polar 16570 is the lack of on the fly micro-adjustments with how much my wrist swells up and down each day. I am stunned to read here that the Ceramic Sub's bracelet is a fit for the no holes case of the 16570 (which I have). Amazing.

When this Covid19 bs is finished I think I will have to set a goal of finding a bracelet for my Polar. It would make it perfect and correct the one and only weakness (in my eyes).
msp1518 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2020, 05:34 AM   #37
offrdmania
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
There are plenty out there for sale, just not at a reasonable price currently.
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2020, 06:50 AM   #38
msp1518
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: NC
Watch: Polar 16570 c.3186
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
There are plenty out there for sale, just not at a reasonable price currently.
I don't see any right now, other than one in the UK for about $2750.

After searching I see a few have sold in the $1950 to $2200 range over the last six months. There is no question that is already a large sum of money for a simple bracelet.
msp1518 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2020, 08:38 AM   #39
offrdmania
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
The $2k range is the average spot for a used one. I have sold many in that price range but they are hard to find right now even at wholesale. Talk to DavidSW, he puts brand new ones up on his site from time to time.
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.