ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 January 2018, 08:50 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 9,098
|
Did the same with my 16710, huge difference
|
29 January 2018, 10:32 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,044
|
|
29 January 2018, 12:27 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
I did the opposite. I bought an older NOS bracelet for my Tudor. Nothing is more comfortable than the old rivet and folded link bracelets.
|
29 March 2020, 11:51 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Watch: Omega 2504.52
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
|
|
29 March 2020, 11:58 AM | #35 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,180
|
Quote:
Hi don’t own anymore the 77200 bracelet but think the complete clasp assembly can be fitted into the 93150 bracelet (same should apply to the 93250 as well). Both glidelock (97200) and easylink (77200) bracelets fit a sub 16610 as long as the case has the lip to hold the SEL (mine is an S series and even though came with the 93150 band can use 93250, 97200 and 77200 bands thanks to the lip on the case; not sure on what serial number does the case started to have it). Hope this helps Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
16 April 2020, 04:24 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: NC
Watch: Polar 16570 c.3186
Posts: 28
|
Resurrecting this thread. The one annoyance with my Polar 16570 is the lack of on the fly micro-adjustments with how much my wrist swells up and down each day. I am stunned to read here that the Ceramic Sub's bracelet is a fit for the no holes case of the 16570 (which I have). Amazing.
When this Covid19 bs is finished I think I will have to set a goal of finding a bracelet for my Polar. It would make it perfect and correct the one and only weakness (in my eyes). |
16 April 2020, 05:34 AM | #37 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
|
There are plenty out there for sale, just not at a reasonable price currently.
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
16 April 2020, 06:50 AM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: NC
Watch: Polar 16570 c.3186
Posts: 28
|
Quote:
After searching I see a few have sold in the $1950 to $2200 range over the last six months. There is no question that is already a large sum of money for a simple bracelet. |
|
16 April 2020, 08:38 AM | #39 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
|
The $2k range is the average spot for a used one. I have sold many in that price range but they are hard to find right now even at wholesale. Talk to DavidSW, he puts brand new ones up on his site from time to time.
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.