ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Gouldy8 · 4 December 2016, 09:19 PM

I made this very same decision yesterday having a 16610T side by side, I decided on the Tudor :)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ar_Mi · 4 December 2016, 09:34 PM

Tudor sub for sure !

Onikage · 4 December 2016, 09:45 PM

Both nice but Sub. It's a Sub.

Spoonage · 5 December 2016, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brucewayne1959

Perfect analysis. That Black Bay is so distinctive and amazing. The Tudor Sub is great but its a Rolex Sub wannabe...

This sounds a ton like back in the day on other forums when 5 series owners hated on the 3 series because they weren't "real BMW"... Fast forward a few years and 3er owners hated on the 1er... Today everyone says the M2 is purer than the M4...

But back to the original topic... Hard choice I own both a 79090 and a BBN Eta... like them both and the both get more wrist time then my 114060...

Spoonage · 5 December 2016, 12:19 AM

But to continue on my above post... Like them all.

DOUGHN · 5 December 2016, 02:25 AM

still own 79090 sub and bronze bb.... the bnew 79090 was a gift from my dad (1994) still my fave watch :)

still got the box, anchor, papers and receipt :)

Black Bay Dan · 5 December 2016, 02:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeychitwood

I have a blue Tudor Submariner 79090, and it would be the last watch of my collection I would ever sell.

Because I lust after this watch I would vote Tudor Prince Oysterdate Submariner 79090. I love my Tudor Black Bay but not as much as the Submariner!

Dan

David cote · 5 December 2016, 03:08 AM

There is just something about the older Tudor that have a lure and and crazy attraction! Love these little machine!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Gerry62 · 5 December 2016, 03:15 AM

Sub '95 , a very classic watch !

up1911fan · 5 December 2016, 03:20 AM

I like the in house Black Bay personally.

bdex75 · 5 December 2016, 03:38 AM

Have both. Don't wear the Tudor Sub as much as I wear the BBN. Mainly due to the fact that it is so close to perfect I won't wear to do yard work or stuff in the garage.

They are both very cool watches and that Tudor sub is to me is a great collectible watch as it the BBN Rose.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

unknown · 5 December 2016, 03:49 AM

For me the black bay is a nice and original watch
The sub is as good as a Rolex sub...
i prefer something more original like the BB

hun23 · 5 December 2016, 04:25 AM

Tudor Sub. But in blue would be bit more special.

Afghanvet · 5 December 2016, 04:35 AM

Submariner... but both are nice!

Wcdhtwn · 5 December 2016, 05:41 AM

Tudor Sub. Can't believe it's not 10 to 1 in favor of it in here. Black Bay is cool but doesn't touch the Tudor Sub.

GB-man · 5 December 2016, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchwatcher

I would be all over the Black Bay except for I just can't get warm to the mixing of the snowflake hands and the round plot markers. Push come to shove, I would probably go with the sub.

Indeed.

JonnyBCisco · 5 December 2016, 07:01 AM

I prefer the Black Bay in-house. It is modern and has the advantages of modern clasp. I would want to start my own thing with the Black Bay rather continue someone else's from 1995.

closey · 6 December 2016, 11:06 AM

Sub for me

tbreihan · 6 December 2016, 11:42 AM

The Sub is special. Not sure if 1995 is technically vintage, but it is a "vintage" watch that exists in limited numbers and is appreciating in value. It also has some history built in.

The Black Bay is an amazing watch. It is not as "special" but it is a technically superior watch in all objective measures. Plus, you can add your own history.

So, which do you value more?

4 December 2016, 09:45 PM	#33
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	Both nice but Sub. It's a Sub. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

5 December 2016, 12:19 AM	#35
Spoonage 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: California Posts: 3,133	But to continue on my above post... Like them all. Attached Images

5 December 2016, 02:25 AM	#36
DOUGHN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Manila Watch: AP.Rolex.Pam.Tudor Posts: 372	still own 79090 sub and bronze bb.... the bnew 79090 was a gift from my dad (1994) still my fave watch :) still got the box, anchor, papers and receipt :) __________________ '13 Rolex116610LV Hulk / '16 Tudor BlackbayBronze / '57 Rolex6494 / '64 Rolex1018 / '74 Tudor9101/0 Ranger2 Auto / '94 Tudor 79090 Sub / '02 Tudor 72980 TigerChrono / '11 AP ROO Ti / '12 Panerai 372 / 71' Omega Cons / '91 TagHeuer 4000 Auto / '16 Seiko PADI turtle / '16 Seiko Sumo / Seiko 6139 speedtimer / Seiko Nano

5 December 2016, 03:38 AM	#41
bdex75 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Brandon Location: Indianapolis Watch: my money vanish Posts: 8,506	Tudor Black Bay in house vs Submariner of 1995 Have both. Don't wear the Tudor Sub as much as I wear the BBN. Mainly due to the fact that it is so close to perfect I won't wear to do yard work or stuff in the garage. They are both very cool watches and that Tudor sub is to me is a great collectible watch as it the BBN Rose. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5 December 2016, 03:49 AM	#42
unknown "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Europe Posts: 2,872	For me the black bay is a nice and original watch The sub is as good as a Rolex sub... i prefer something more original like the BB __________________ Instagram : @collectible_watches

4 December 2016, 09:19 PM	#31
Gouldy8 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: Australia Posts: 23	I made this very same decision yesterday having a 16610T side by side, I decided on the Tudor :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

4 December 2016, 09:34 PM	#32
Ar_Mi "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Dubai/Los Angeles Watch: a few Posts: 595	Tudor sub for sure !

5 December 2016, 03:08 AM	#38
David cote 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: David Cote Location: 603/Boston 617 Watch: Watches etc Posts: 2,322	There is just something about the older Tudor that have a lure and and crazy attraction! Love these little machine! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5 December 2016, 03:15 AM	#39
Gerry62 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Italy EU Watch: Rolex Panerai Posts: 7,502	Sub '95 , a very classic watch !

5 December 2016, 03:20 AM	#40
up1911fan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: Michigan Posts: 20	I like the in house Black Bay personally.

5 December 2016, 04:25 AM	#43
hun23 Banned Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: USA Posts: 872	Tudor Sub. But in blue would be bit more special.

5 December 2016, 04:35 AM	#44
Afghanvet "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Virginia Watch: Subs, SD4K Posts: 2,272	Submariner... but both are nice! __________________ Subaholics Anonymous

5 December 2016, 05:41 AM	#45
Wcdhtwn "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Houston Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2 Posts: 5,059	Tudor Sub. Can't believe it's not 10 to 1 in favor of it in here. Black Bay is cool but doesn't touch the Tudor Sub.

5 December 2016, 07:01 AM	#47
JonnyBCisco "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: McLean, VA Watch: AP 15400 White Posts: 150	I prefer the Black Bay in-house. It is modern and has the advantages of modern clasp. I would want to start my own thing with the Black Bay rather continue someone else's from 1995.

6 December 2016, 11:06 AM	#48
closey "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Closey Location: England Posts: 184	Sub for me

6 December 2016, 11:42 AM	#49
tbreihan "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Tim Location: Midwest Watch: Speedy Pro, BBN Posts: 19	The Sub is special. Not sure if 1995 is technically vintage, but it is a "vintage" watch that exists in limited numbers and is appreciating in value. It also has some history built in. The Black Bay is an amazing watch. It is not as "special" but it is a technically superior watch in all objective measures. Plus, you can add your own history. So, which do you value more?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)