ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 July 2017, 08:15 AM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Nashville, TN
Watch: 126334
Posts: 159
|
Quote:
|
|
8 July 2017, 08:23 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: 114060 / 114300
Posts: 325
|
39mm OP Rhodium
|
8 July 2017, 10:25 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Here
Posts: 1,003
|
Well. I tried but evidently Photobucket no longer allows me to post my photos....unless I pay them I'm sure. Will need to investigate other options. If you want one I can email you if you want to PM me your email address. Sorry, frustrating not to be able to post my pics.
|
28 July 2017, 12:43 PM | #34 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,179
|
36mm is the one!
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
1 August 2017, 12:51 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Peach State
Posts: 735
|
Tough question but I'd say go 39. It is true that the 36 wears larger than it is but the 39 definitely has a bigger wrist presence. And in regards to the color dots around the hour markers, they really do disappear in person. Hard to explain, but they stick out like a sore thumb in photos but in person they are barely noticeable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
1 August 2017, 10:59 PM | #36 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 3,289
|
|
2 August 2017, 12:15 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: 114060 / 114300
Posts: 325
|
39mm OP Rhodium for me .
|
2 August 2017, 02:17 AM | #38 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,692
|
|
2 August 2017, 02:31 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
I vote 116000, 36mm, love the fit, the understated look, the choice of dials is far superior, IMO, to the 39mm version.
not my pic
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
2 August 2017, 03:02 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 55
|
I would go with the 39 mm. It's the only oyster perpetual with the upgraded 3132 movement. I have the same wrist size as you and agonized between the 36 mm and the 39 mm Explorer. I went with the 39 mm Explorer. The size is perfect. Given your age, I think your peers will find the 36 mm small.
|
5 August 2017, 06:27 AM | #41 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
Here's a picture of mine, 16cm (6.3") wrists. This one really captures its beauty! |
|
5 August 2017, 04:57 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,385
|
I'd go 39, it's not that big really.
|
12 August 2017, 01:05 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 3
|
I have the 116000 in steel dial. It is really a great watch. 40 year old medical professional. This is my every day watch. 36mm flies under the radar but it is a beauty!!
Last edited by joesafdieh; 12 August 2017 at 01:22 PM.. Reason: adding photo |
12 August 2017, 10:19 PM | #44 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,179
|
36 mm blue OP
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
18 November 2017, 08:31 PM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Outback Australia
Watch: Datejust 36
Posts: 88
|
OP 36mm for sure
Quote:
^^^ What he said for sure As a child I always loathed why someone would choose a 36mm dateless watch??? Now I've grown up I see why... The OP 36mm is such an understated and elegant piece, and so versatile with the indices only dials. I also love the brushed bracelet and classic case finishing! (Just for reference my wrist measures 7" and I'm a professional man in my mid-forty's). The 39mm (in Rhodium) appeared so big, it was the only new Rolex I didn't even bother to try on. I thought the coloured dial pips definitely didn't suit Rolex. I was also concerned the pips were the beginning of cheaper made things to come from Rolex, IMHO. |
|
18 November 2017, 08:44 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX DJ 1603
Posts: 337
|
Get a 36mm with with the 3 6 9 Blue dial. A blue explorer with some dressy hands lol. Too bad they don’t offer the black with the 3 6 9 anymore. I remember a thread on here where a guy got the black only available for short time probably because Rolex thought it was too similar to the explorer
|
18 November 2017, 08:46 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 11
|
You should definitely just go and try it out - best way to do it
|
19 November 2017, 07:59 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Ljubljana
Posts: 11
|
39mm with soft colors of 36mm would be it :)
|
19 November 2017, 08:20 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 205
|
OP 36m Blue with 3,6,9 dial or DJ 36m Black, Arabic, Concentric dial or BB 36m
|
11 July 2018, 01:29 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 1
|
I wavered on this for a couple of months and the 36mm with 3-6-9 indicators ended up being a slam dunk.
A bit sportier and more versatile and I'd agree with others that it "wears big". I found that it had more wrist presence than the 39. I'm 6'3 and it looks absolutely fine. |
11 July 2018, 02:06 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: In my home.
Watch: 116660, 126600
Posts: 2,905
|
|
11 July 2018, 02:15 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: In my home.
Watch: 116660, 126600
Posts: 2,905
|
|
11 July 2018, 02:23 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: N/A
Posts: 13
|
For classic proportions and plenty size on the wrist, the 36mm is the one I would (and did) choose. I recommend it very highly.
Mine is the steel dial but I'd also recommend you have a good look at the new 2018 version white dial. With clean, simple design (and no coloured index dots) both of these have a strong claim to be the most classically well proportioned watches in the current lineup. |
11 July 2018, 02:49 AM | #54 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Oyster Perpertual 39 white
Enviado desde mi SM-G930F mediante Tapatalk |
11 July 2018, 03:13 AM | #55 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: London
Posts: 3,318
|
|
11 July 2018, 03:20 AM | #56 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 2,156
|
Just received a 39mm OP and it’s the perfect size, IMO. That being said, my wrists are small.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 July 2018, 03:34 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 110
|
Try the new OP 39 white. Great face and in my opinion the best OP out there.
|
11 July 2018, 03:48 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: London
Posts: 760
|
I choose this over Explorer 1.
|
11 July 2018, 06:18 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: California
Posts: 2,176
|
Prior to the introduction of the white and black dial 39mm, I would have probably gone with the 36mm in silver or blue, but now my choice would be the 39mm with the white dial. Unless you have a very small wrist, it should look fine.
|
11 July 2018, 06:39 AM | #60 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: New York
Watch: GMT II BLNR
Posts: 201
|
Quote:
Anyway go with what you like and get the OP, I suggest wearing both during a visit to an AD. Take a look at it with the naked eye. Then take pictures of it and see from your phone. Get a good feel on what wears better on your wrist as well. I did the same thing when I got my Explorer. I was torn between the 36 and the 39. I have the same exact wrist size as yours 6.75-6.8. Both looked good, what did it for me was if I was the 39 looked better with the bracelet and it felt more snug. The 36mm on the bracelet looked a little small for me. even though it looked perfect on a strap. The movement on the 39 OP is exactly the same as the Explorer's movement. It adds a paraflex shock absorber to the 3130 movement which is on the 36 OP. Not that you'd notice a big difference but always a good to know. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.