The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 June 2021, 10:55 PM   #31
Crazy Lugs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 855
One thing to consider is how it feels with long sleeves, which I wear nearly year round given the climate. One aspect I appreciate about the 36mm pieces is how they don’t interfere with my sleeves or shirt cuff, especially when wearing a sweater. Also, I have the same size and shape wrist (6’-1” tall) so share your concerns about size, but it’s less of a concern when wearing with long sleeves IMHO.
Crazy Lugs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2021, 11:12 PM   #32
S.Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: Rollie
Posts: 798
Watch looks fine - if your wrist was more than 7", possibly it would look too small.
S.Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2021, 01:15 AM   #33
TimeAZ
"TRF" Member
 
TimeAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,240
It's just a little small for your wrist. The former 39mm 214270 would be a better fit for you.

Personally, it sounds to me like you are making a concession regarding the size. I find that if something bothers you in the back of your mind, it will always bother you, why cope with it when you are spending so much money? No doubt that 36mm is a great, classic size and has its role in certain styles and wrist types. As a sports piece (especially on bracelet), the 124270 is a great option for someone with a small wrist. Paired to a larger-wristed individual, it loses its sports appeal and starts looking a little odd. Maybe would work better in a "classic" sense on a strap and elevating it more to a dress style. Anyway, I think your wrist specifically is borderline, upper range that this watch would go on. Any larger, and it just doesn't work. Same applies for a small wristed fellow trying to wear a 44mm deep sea.
TimeAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2021, 01:22 AM   #34
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
Why fight it? Too many watches and only one wrist. :-)

But, if you’re happy now, that’s all that matters.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2021, 03:20 AM   #35
AJMarcus
"TRF" Member
 
AJMarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuger View Post
Rolex 36mm watches have their charm and deserve a place in any collection. You wear them and not the other way around.
Very well said. Completely agree
AJMarcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2021, 04:32 AM   #36
OneMoreSi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London
Watch: DSSD,Explorer,GMT
Posts: 150
If you are happy and love it nothing else matters.
IMO the aesthetics look a bit off on a 7" wrist, my 39mm covers my wrist...each to their own.
OneMoreSi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 01:01 AM   #37
Heady Topper
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 321
Trade for a 39mm. You shouldn’t have to talk yourself into digging an expensive watch. Also, people were shitting on the 36mm OP as a watch for men, now all of a sudden it’s the coolest thing…
Heady Topper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 01:08 AM   #38
ThatSubGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heady Topper View Post
Trade for a 39mm. You shouldn’t have to talk yourself into digging an expensive watch. Also, people were shitting on the 36mm OP as a watch for men, now all of a sudden it’s the coolest thing…
The insecurities of 90% of the users here never seize to amaze me.
ThatSubGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 04:06 AM   #39
snyde
"TRF" Member
 
snyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Austin
Posts: 563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikegp View Post
Congrats. Just got one myself this week. My smallest by far. But love it


Nice look on the strap.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
snyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 07:58 AM   #40
Mr Biggles
"TRF" Member
 
Mr Biggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: In my home
Watch: JLC Reverso 1948
Posts: 122
Looks good.
Explorer in 36 will always be the understated watch with class. Great allrounder, and wears easily. If you want more attention to your wrist then you can go 39mm....whatever you want
Mr Biggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 10:14 AM   #41
Baden H
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nottingham UK
Posts: 7
Looks amazing my wrist is 7 3/4 inch I wear loads of 35/36 mm watches.
Got a BB36, omega Seamaster 120m and an IWC mark xi all look fine in my eyes when I look at my wrist.
I’ve just put my name down on the new Explorer 36mm and I’m so eager to get it on my wrist.

Great choice.
Baden H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 10:20 AM   #42
DramaTurtle
"TRF" Member
 
DramaTurtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
As long as the mental anguish is over, wear and enjoy. You shouldn't have to put up with that stuff every time you strap it on. If it persists, sell and get the 39!
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDL View Post
Rolex moved to its furthest point of being a tool watch. The new Sea-Dweller and Meteorite GMT seem best suited for raising PGA trophies, and that might be the closest we get to one anyway.
DramaTurtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 11:02 AM   #43
stark1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Northeast
Watch: Rolex/AP/ALS/Omega
Posts: 1,505
Congrats, and thanks for sharing!
stark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 11:15 AM   #44
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
Looks good to me. It's an iconic watch - enjoy!
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 02:15 PM   #45
gordonite
"TRF" Member
 
gordonite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 77
I've been wearing 114270 36mm for the past 3 years non-stop, it become my only watch. The great versatility of 36mm sizing is unbeaten-able, even Rolex which never known to move back in sizing, did it and acknowledged the perfect size.

But in my opinion the newest 36mm sort-of feel smaller because the way bracelet sized. The move to 19mm from 20mm is significant IMHO. For example you get same/similar bracelet in Exp36 with GMT and Submariner not big differences in current line up.

So in bias opinion, I think previous gen Exp36 is better in overall fit as it is more angular.
gordonite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 05:27 PM   #46
Kingdom2121
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Taiwan
Watch: Patek, Rolex, AP
Posts: 147
If for a dress watch 36mm is fine, for a sport watch..........I have to say 39mm and above better.
Kingdom2121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 05:33 PM   #47
Highend7
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: 🌎
Watch: Rolex 116520
Posts: 126
Yes it might look small, It's built that way to large wrists... But one thing for sure is it's comfortable feel and appeal.
I have a big wrist too but I don't mind the size of the Explorer, I will wear it always.
Highend7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 06:30 PM   #48
russeree
"TRF" Member
 
russeree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Oregon
Watch: 214270
Posts: 341
I am happy for you but 39-40mm is the sweet spot for most men. 36 is too small for most.
russeree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2021, 10:18 PM   #49
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jorge Borbolla View Post
This is exactly the message I was trying to convey!, I agree with you 100%.
"You pick the Explorer because it is the Explorer"





Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuger View Post
Rolex 36mm watches have their charm and deserve a place in any collection. You wear them and not the other way around.
An even better way of putting it. Most of my favorite watches were originally built/chosen for a purpose, not as a fashion statement. Size was the dependent variable in their design. For such watches, I'm only too grateful for the technical innovations made since their original debut, but like those as visually similar to the originals as possible.

Explorer 36mm, GMT Master (original), Air King (original), Milgauss (original), IWC Mark XI, JLC Reverso, Omega Speedmaster moon watch (forget original reference). All now come in, or have come in, versions much larger than the original, and aren't really my taste.

OTOH, a 40mm Panerai looks disproportionately small to me, since the originals were basically wrist-bound submarines...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baden H View Post
Looks amazing my wrist is 7 3/4 inch I wear loads of 35/36 mm watches.
Got a BB36, omega Seamaster 120m and an IWC mark xi all look fine in my eyes when I look at my wrist.
I’ve just put my name down on the new Explorer 36mm and I’m so eager to get it on my wrist.

Great choice.
Some enviable pieces in there - I remember the Omega Seamaster 120 fondly, and actually found its design much more pleasing than the AT line that replaced it (with designs that looked more Rolex-esque than historically Omega). XI is something special, too. Good luck on getting the new Explorer; think you're going to love it!
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2021, 05:50 AM   #50
bleighs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: 126711 CHNR
Posts: 99
It looks tiny on you, I'm sorry. Imo it's the watch that needs to fit the owner, not the other way around.
bleighs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2021, 06:00 AM   #51
Merlin69
"TRF" Member
 
Merlin69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Europe
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 393
Nice one! Wear it in good health
__________________
♛ GMT Master II 116710LN, ♛ GMT Master II 126710BLRO, ♛ Submariner 116610LV, ♛ Explorer II 216570 Black, ♛ Deepsea D-Blue 126660
Ω Speedmaster Professional 1861 (Hesalite), Ω Speedmaster 321 "Ed White", Ω Speedmaster "Snoopy 50th Anniversary", IWC Fliegerchronograph, Cartier Tank Americaine Medium, Cartier Tank Must (Blue)
Merlin69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.