ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 March 2022, 07:51 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
|
24 March 2022, 08:06 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: canada
Posts: 452
|
amazing - is that a 41 or 36? congrats
|
24 March 2022, 08:31 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,237
|
Beautiful!! Congrats on an amazing piece
__________________
The perfect blossom is a rare thing. You could spend your life looking for one, and it would not be a wasted life. |
24 March 2022, 08:43 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Joe
Location: Western MA
Posts: 1,211
|
IMO the lume on Rolex watches is underwhelming at best. Even with my Submariner, it would disappear quickly rendering it basically useless. I bought a Breitling super ocean 42 and the thing glows like a torch. So much better.
Having said that I love my Wimbledon DJ41. I don’t find myself needing to tell the time in the dark that often. In normal lighting I don’t have an issue reading the time. |
25 March 2022, 05:35 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,171
|
Lume is overrated, meaning it doesn't last or even charge up under normal wearing, at least for me. I have a Wimbledon and in low lighting always good enough to see the hands. White or Black is a little better. I say this by looking at mine when I'm in bed with only the TV on.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
25 March 2022, 08:07 AM | #36 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Fl
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
Yeah it sucks in the dark and very low light but no different from any other non-lume watch. Much prefer to lousy sticks that glow in the dark IMHO. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.