ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
24 November 2014, 07:05 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Probably one of the many secret counterfeit identifying marks. Much harder to line that up perfectly off center than to create one that lines up like before. It is another cool detail in the scheme of things.
|
24 November 2014, 07:10 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Well, it is interesting to see a seldom noticed variation..
A few years back all the rage was noticing where the end of the seconds hand went past the o in Rolex..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
24 November 2014, 06:08 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
till now i hadnt noticed the second hand line up , wonder if it was designed that way , or is it coincidence ,,, the detail , its all in the detail.
|
24 November 2014, 06:12 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Slovenia, EU
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,507
|
Here is my BLNR.
The painted circle matches end of hour hand nicely. |
24 November 2014, 06:15 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: uk
Posts: 1,050
|
life just isn't perfect, but my Rolex is Hobbies are to enjoy, work is the problem
|
24 November 2014, 06:25 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,598
|
interesting observation Mik, never noticed but must admit I got a little laugh out of it
its all good. |
24 November 2014, 06:29 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Manassas,Virginia
Watch: Ol'Bluesy & Hulk
Posts: 2,871
|
Simple explanation. On maxi dial, the hour and minute hands are bigger while the second hand is the same size as the non-maxi dial.
|
24 November 2014, 06:32 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
|
Checked 6 watches:
116710BLRO - off center 114060 - off center 16570 - on center 216570 - on center 16750 - on center 14060 - on center |
24 November 2014, 06:54 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Oh yeah, you need a girlfriend.
|
24 November 2014, 06:54 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,000
|
This thread was a great read for some reason.
|
24 November 2014, 07:51 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,037
|
Never noticed that on the 16610. Very cool. Too bad not on the new ceramics. Thanks for posting.
|
24 November 2014, 08:26 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Panos
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: 16710
Posts: 8,704
|
216570
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
24 November 2014, 10:10 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NJ / Philippines
Posts: 189
|
SDC
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
24 November 2014, 01:17 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 679
|
maybe due to the maxi dials and more importantly, maxi hands...
|
24 November 2014, 01:25 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
What about the new expy II? They still line up.
__________________
member#3242 |
24 November 2014, 03:31 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 679
|
seemed that they have a bigger seconds hand.
on other models (that uses maxi hands) however, the seconds hand seemed to be of the same size as that from pre-maxi hands era.. and mik, nice that you brought it up. I've actually noticed it (this back of the second hand nicely lining up with the merc hand) ages ago and just thought that it was one of those QC and design brilliance of rolex. But since the introduction of maxi hands... only now we see some differences. Brave of you to post on this (at times) "cruel" forum.. |
24 November 2014, 02:11 PM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
I think it is how the new hour hands are slightly longer in the maxi set, I don't think the seconds hands have not changed.
|
24 November 2014, 05:13 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Xavier
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 116600
Posts: 446
|
V series 16610LV: off center, like ceramic models.
__________________
Liberty |
24 November 2014, 06:07 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Texas
Watch: Exp, GMTII, Sub
Posts: 1,184
|
I have to think that it was no coincidence that the older models lined up perfectly, probably one of the many tiny design details that makes the watches so beautiful to us by hitting some lower level pleasure center in our brains that likes to see symmetry.
Assuming it was done by design, I'm surprised they didn't do the same on the maxi dials. Maybe leaving the second hand just a hair shorter helps play into the overall maxi look. Either way, cool spot OP |
24 November 2014, 06:19 PM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
Quote:
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
|
24 November 2014, 08:32 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 478
|
116610 no overlap here.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.