ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
24 June 2013, 01:03 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
|
The 16610 is too small on my frame in my opinion, but the 116610 looks great.
__________________
Lead by example through production. |
24 June 2013, 01:07 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
no it's fine the way it is and has always been, most love it as it is imho
__________________
watches many |
24 June 2013, 01:11 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: San Angelo, TX
Watch: Rlx,Omega,JLC,Breg
Posts: 1,699
|
40 mm isn't small regardless of wrist size...perfect fit. And, the Sub wears larger than it is.
__________________
|
24 June 2013, 01:26 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,252
|
i guess my opinion is jaded because i have big flat wrists.... i guess 40mm is probably perfect for most of the normal sized folks..
|
24 June 2013, 01:41 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PE - BR
Posts: 558
|
Very subjective question, It all depends on your body build and wrist size.
Its like asking if a size 32 pant is too small and others complaining a 36 is too big. I never get this too big/small threads, useless imo.
__________________
126600 126603 116900 116610LV 116610LN 126610LN AP15703 PAM029 Santos de Cartier |
24 June 2013, 02:51 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
|
before its big. now its small
|
24 June 2013, 03:15 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Adelaide
Watch: 14060 Sub
Posts: 332
|
Here's a pic of my Sub on my 8.75" wrist. I've never thought it was too small, but after a wearing a Speedy for a week or so, it does take a little to adjust to. I can get away with wearing a larger watch, but a 44mm on a 7" wrist
|
24 June 2013, 03:57 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: sam
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Me Tint
Posts: 3,777
|
I think anything bigger than 40mm begins to look cheap, unless of course its a DSSD!
|
25 June 2013, 05:29 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
|
24 June 2013, 04:17 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Henry
Location: TW/SoCal
Posts: 1,632
|
It's just fine for most of people, but if your wrist is into high 7's or more range, it may start to look small.
|
24 June 2013, 05:38 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,294
|
A 1000 times no.
It is perfection......Rolex...are you listening...please don't @#%& with it.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
24 June 2013, 06:49 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 367
|
Rolex please don't supersize it
|
24 June 2013, 09:14 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Dan
Location: UK
Watch: 116528
Posts: 1,049
|
|
24 June 2013, 09:21 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,692
|
40 mm isn't too small BUT 42mm certainly isn't too big for a sport watch for the vast majority of wrist sizes imo. (i.e. 6.25 inches and above more or less.)
|
24 June 2013, 09:37 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: India
Posts: 324
|
42mm is the perfect size for any watch
|
24 June 2013, 11:02 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ken
Location: New York, NY
Watch: GS SD GMT
Posts: 389
|
I think that 40mm is a little small. Would rather see 42 or 43mm.
|
24 June 2013, 11:48 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
|
|
25 June 2013, 12:00 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 2,753
|
something I have noticed is for example the current Sub looks bigger than many 42mm Omega's or Breitling's. Omega's (Seamaster line) for example wear small compared to their advertized size where Rolex tends to wear big for their advertized size.
|
25 June 2013, 02:01 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
I remember when i bought my first sub, it was the biggest watch i knew of and it took a while to get used to and it took a while for other manufacturers to come up to the 40mm size.
I would say Panerai was the first larger watch to gain acceptance & break the 40mm barrier. Sometimes 40mm looks a bit small on me, when compared to the wrist shots, where the lugs sit flush with edge of the wrist. I guess the 40mm is perfect but not as perfect as it was .... 42mm could easily fit the bill today. I would have been sold on a 42mm sea dweller "NSDS" (not so deep sea)
__________________
|
25 June 2013, 02:32 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
I agree with you that Panerai popularized the "too big" watch look. However, the Omega Speedmaster had been acceptable at 42mm for a long time prior to Stallone and Arnold sporting their "manly man" PAMs.
|
25 June 2013, 03:13 AM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,549
|
nope
__________________
___________________ GMT II 126719 Meteorite + GMT II 126710BLRO + Daytona 116500LN (White) + Submariner 16610LV + Explorer II 16570 Polar + Submariner 116610LV + GMT II 16713 Rootbeer + Sky-Dweller 336934 (Blue) + GMT II 16710 (Pepsi & Coke) + Sea-Dweller 116600 Breitling Premier B25 Datora 2FA Security Active |
25 June 2013, 05:23 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,252
|
dont get me wrong, even though i have 8" wrists i know my limits. i wouldnt be wearing a 60mm or something that hung over the edges of my wrist....
i guess its really noticeable to me because its 8" and flat across the top. believe me i wish it was closer to 7" so i could have a million more options on watches that i liked.... maybe i can get some surgery! ill be the first guy to get a wrist reduction so i can wear smaller watches!! lol. (i know i can actually wear them, just personally do not feel they look the best on me) |
25 June 2013, 06:18 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Tommy
Location: New jersey
Watch: Rolex 16610
Posts: 457
|
40 mil is perfect. I bought a 45 mil po ceramic and it felt huge! 40 mil is perfect not to big not to small, just PERFECT!!!
|
25 June 2013, 06:18 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: England
Posts: 514
|
Even 'the last bastion' (Rolex) realized that 40mm is generally too small for a modern day mans sports watch, that's why they super sized the new case. If they had kept the old style but just upgraded it to say 42mm if would be vastly outselling the current one.
|
25 June 2013, 06:35 AM | #25 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
|
|
25 June 2013, 06:43 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: England
Posts: 514
|
|
25 June 2013, 08:59 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Yes way too small. It's a boys/woman's watch.
Come Mods close this thread. This is just old. There a lot of oversized watch threads out there. Is this too big for my wrist. Yes if you need to ask. Does this watch make me look fat. No it's your face that makes you look fat. This post is intended to be fun. No posters were hurt. I hope. |
25 June 2013, 09:39 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: GMT -5
Watch: Rolex/Panerai
Posts: 991
|
Quote:
|
|
25 June 2013, 09:58 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Hector
Location: Lake Placid, NY
Watch: Rolex Day-Date
Posts: 390
|
Who cares? I think is the right size, but I only have a 7.5 wrist size, so it looks just fine
__________________
Owner's Club "Jealousy won't get you a thing" |
25 June 2013, 10:10 AM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: U.K.
Posts: 30
|
I think it's just about right the way it is. Personally, I wouldn't be too keen to wear a watch larger than 40mm. Any bigger just doesn't look right on me.
I think 39mm-41mm is perfect for most men's wrists. Just my . |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.