ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 November 2009, 12:34 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: NEAL
Location: Aventura, Florida
Watch: GMT II TT M Series
Posts: 1
|
Watch Winders
I am new to this forum , and new to Rolex watches in general, I recently
bought a GMT II series M , and am wondering if their is any benefit to my Rolex to put it on a watch winder when not in use ... Thanks in advance Neal |
30 November 2009, 05:29 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
welcome to the forum.
2 schools of thought. let your wrist be the winder, or put it on a winder. either way is not going to hurt the watch. |
1 December 2009, 11:47 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 2
|
Hello
Just bought GMT II. My other watches are automatics. 1. Is it better to keep watches running with the aid of a winder, or can I let them just wind down and reset as needed? Some blogs worry about "congealing oil". 2. My Breitling requires 800tpd CW, Rolex only 650tpd Bi, is it alright to use the higher one directional setting required by the Breitling to keep both watches running. What a conundrum. JU |
2 December 2009, 02:14 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
This thread is gonna open up a can of worms!
Let me get my opinion in before everyone else does. I don't think winders are necessary. However, in the year or so that I have owned an Orbita, I have found them to be very convenient and elegant. I no longer know if I collect watches or winders. IMO get a winder if you like to just pick up your watch and go. If not, save your money towards buying another watch. It doesn't hurt your watch to just sit there. |
2 December 2009, 02:51 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,060
|
Quote:
So IMHO watch-winders are not needed with any watch with just a simple date complication. While there is no significant evidence that a good watch winder will either save or harm your watch.Over the many years of dealing with Rolex Bexly and talking to the various watchmakers there, who did not recommend watch-winders for any of the Rolex line up.Its quite funny now that Rolex have brought out a Rolex branded winder,its simple today watch winders = big £££$$$ and huge profits.IMHO many watch-winders today have a high quality finish on the outside (to justify the extremely high price),but hiding some very cheaply mass-produced insides. . __________________
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
2 December 2009, 10:43 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Lionel Wylie
Location: Australia
Watch: Rolex GMT SS
Posts: 277
|
The watch winder will neither help or hinder your watch! It is about convenience, If you have several mechanical automatic watches, and you don't want to reset a watch that you have not worn for a week or so. Get a winder. If you find that you don't mind, or even enjoy, winding up and setting a watch you have not used for a while, then save your money and put it towards your next Rolex!
|
16 December 2009, 06:28 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Yazan
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,782
|
Quote:
__________________
Patek Philippe 5167 Patek Philippe 5905P black dial Rolex Deepsea 116660 M series Rolex Oysterquartz 17000 N series Rolex OP 41MM 124300 Green Dial |
|
16 December 2009, 10:36 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
|
If you want one get a good one and they are not cheap. I have an Orbita which is one of the best. But it is hardly used any more. =) maverick
|
19 December 2009, 07:52 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bill
Location: Rolex heaven.
Watch: Definately ROLEX
Posts: 35
|
I have 3 rolexes that I keep on 2 Brookstone watch winders. I do it for both convenience and so I don't have to unscrew the crown that much. I usually set them on 30 day months. Also I found the Brookstone winders very reasonably priced.
|
21 December 2009, 12:22 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Spencer
Location: The Triad, NC
Watch: GMT IIc 116713
Posts: 141
|
I have seen the Brookstone winders and wondered about their quality for the price. How many "turns per hour" are they?
I will say that I do not have one yet and my (now 4 Rolexes) get wound each time I change watches and I have noticed any ill effects from that. They are very convenient for not having to wind and synchronize date time/24 hour time also. I will be getting one at some point..the key is to be forward thinking enough to get one with enough slots to take into account FUTUR purchases! Sparky |
21 December 2009, 02:54 AM | #11 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
Sometimes a post within a thread gets lost... You can post your own.,. 1. It is not "better" to keep a watch running, although it can run nonstop for years. A running watch is grinding and working, and will eventually wear out. As for "congealing oil", this is a thing of the past. modern lubricants are synthetic and do not really wear out, but, the small particles from the watch moving and grinding will contaminate the oil and make it more of a sludge, so from that perspective, it is better to let the watch sit idle. 2. A Rolex will wind in either direction, so if you have your Breitling winder set for 800 CW, then it will also wind the Rolex.. you don't need to go in both directions.. 800 as opposed to 650 won't hurt it either.. it cannot be over-wound.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
21 December 2009, 03:13 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Morgantown, WV
Watch: Deep Sea
Posts: 55
|
i have 3 automatics on my orbita quattro, i find it is a necessity for me
|
24 December 2009, 08:44 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Watch: SS Blk Daytona
Posts: 67
|
I only have 2 watches: an Omega SMP and my beloved SS Daytona. I bought an Orbita Belino winder and I love it. My daytona spend 5 days a week on the winder and then it's used most weekends. The convenence of the winder is fantastic.
As for brands, I found the orbita belino to have the most features for the price (bi direction, turns per day, battery and hard wired). Also, it cost me half the price of winders sold in australia and it is far better quality.
__________________
SS Daytona BLK (Z Series) BLNR Reverso Duo Large Manual Wind Seamaster Professional |
24 December 2009, 12:17 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Robert
Location: N.O.LA.
Posts: 475
|
Have an Orbita 3 head, but switching over to Wolf Designs(rechargeable) 4.0. You can buy them 1 at a time and they're connectable. Are they necessary? Probably not, but they are nice to look at.
__________________
|
24 December 2009, 02:26 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
|
11 January 2010, 02:32 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
|
I alternate between my 16030 DJ and my 16610 Sub. When one is on my wrist, the other is on the winder. I have it set up to turn on 3 times during sleeping hours to do 600 revolutions during the night in two different directions. I also have a two-watch attachment to put on the winder if I were to need to put two watches on it.
I do have a Rolex 1002 but it is a tad small for me and has no date, so it is not in my regular watch wearing rotation. It will probably end up on my son's wrist when he graduates from high school. Or my daughter if she wants it (she graduates first).
__________________
2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601 1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000 Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324 *RIP PAL 1942-2015 |
10 April 2014, 06:29 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NJ
Watch: 116610LN, 116234
Posts: 211
|
After reading this thread I am inclined to buy a nice watch holder case instead of a winder. After all, these marvels need to live in a nice home of their own!!
|
10 April 2014, 06:40 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
|
Watch winders and old thread bumps -- two of Padi's favorite things!
|
21 April 2014, 01:41 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Bajor
Posts: 20
|
I think winders are great for timepieces with complications which are difficult to set manually. Otherwise I prefer not using a winder.
|
27 April 2014, 10:32 PM | #20 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Reno
Posts: 1,028
|
Quote:
|
|
12 August 2016, 03:47 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Larry
Location: Vancouver BC
Watch: Rolex date Just
Posts: 5
|
Wolf Watch winder
I have owned my Rolex (date just) for over 25 years and until last week it kept shitty time .I had it cleaned by a real pro The cleaning took 3 weeks and cost 800 dollars and the old watchmaker recommended a watch winder .I searched amazon and googled Wolfe and voila I am using a Wolf .I have used it every night from about 8 pm until 7 am on their clockwise counter clock wise setting ( C) which has a liberal sleep time with no rotation .Their specs suggest each 6hr cycle has 45 turns with 60 minutes of turns then 90 minutes of rest in 4 cycles . The watch keeps perfect time .I set it to my cell phone and it hasn't lost a beat since I have had it cleaned and used teh watch winder .I am convinced that Rolex should put more emphasis on a winder when one buys the watch
|
17 August 2016, 08:47 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
|
Wolf, great watch winder
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich |
17 August 2016, 09:20 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
The possible benefit is simple - maybe convenience. If you wear it daily and are moderately active it's not going to stop ticking anyway so a winder is probably unnecessary. It also depends on how much you consider it inconvenient to have to wind and set a watch.
The downside is wear and tear - if you believe a watch that is running will incur wear over time versus one that is sitting idle. I do believe this. Still, just like the benefit of convenience, it depends on your wearing habits. If you wear it every day then it is always going to be running anyway, so a winder, while probably unnecessary, won't really cause any additional wear and tear. That is it in a nut shell. Some people will tell you winding and setting a watch will cause additional wear and tear on the crown versus a winder. My experience is the only crown problems I've had were from non-use. There are definitely two camps on the winder wars. I don't use one, but simply don't have the need. I don't have any grand complications (perpetual calendar, etc.) and my wearing habits are such a winder would result in my watches running a significant amount of time when not on my wrist, so I don't use one. Whatever works for you.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.