ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Safetrends · 13 December 2009, 10:44 AM

I would like some input on this one.
The dial hands are really thick and is correct for this Datejust?
The photo of the back of the case does not show the numbers that are normally stamped on the end pieces or watch bracelet?
The photo of the band Rolex logo does not show the band serial number?
Still learning and asking questions.

level · 13 December 2009, 10:58 AM

I believe that is a newer model DJ and the numbers are stamped inside the end piece. I'm still learning too. It may be a DJII which have the thicker hands to keep in proportion to the bigger case.

TattooedGQ · 13 December 2009, 11:13 AM

shouldnt there be lume in the hands?? my DJ has it....but it's from '65

sirjohnbrian · 13 December 2009, 02:40 PM

I think it's a fake. Magnification on the cyclops is off. Crown on the dial looks nothing like mine. Rolex etching on the band seems rough.

idk01 · 13 December 2009, 10:20 PM

Reahut looks way wrong to me and do does the bezel :

13 December 2009, 10:44 AM	#1
Safetrends Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: David Walz Location: San Diego CA USA Watch: my hand. :) Posts: 9,156	Men's ROLEX DATEJUST w/ Rolex factory diamond dial I would like some input on this one. The dial hands are really thick and is correct for this Datejust? The photo of the back of the case does not show the numbers that are normally stamped on the end pieces or watch bracelet? The photo of the band Rolex logo does not show the band serial number? Still learning and asking questions. Attached Images

13 December 2009, 11:13 AM	#3
TattooedGQ "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Justin Location: NY, USA Watch: yo self! Posts: 2,686	shouldnt there be lume in the hands?? my DJ has it....but it's from '65 __________________ That boy's got the Devil in him. Rolex: I think I'm up to 9?? Omega: Got a few of those too. Breitling: And some of these.

13 December 2009, 02:40 PM	#4
sirjohnbrian "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: PA Watch: 'chu lookin' at??? Posts: 964	I think it's a fake. Magnification on the cyclops is off. Crown on the dial looks nothing like mine. Rolex etching on the band seems rough. __________________ "Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." Mark Twain "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." Homer Simpson SS Midsize DJ 68274 "L" TT Jubilee DJ 116233 "Z" Sea Dweller DS 116660 "V" SS White Dial Daytona "V"

13 December 2009, 10:20 PM	#5
idk01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Dave Location: Australia Watch: DJ16233TT Posts: 18,485	Reahut looks way wrong to me and do does the bezel : __________________ *Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth*

13 December 2009, 10:58 AM	#2
level Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: U.S. Posts: 296	I believe that is a newer model DJ and the numbers are stamped inside the end piece. I'm still learning too. It may be a DJII which have the thicker hands to keep in proportion to the bigger case.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)