|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 December 2009, 07:16 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 24
|
Please post pics of Sub and GMT2
Hi guys,
can someone please post comparison pictures of the Sub and the GMTc......I don't know if Im going mad, but the sub looks as though its a bigger watch than the GMT2c......but I thought it was the other way round ! Thanks as ever Marcus |
|
|
|
14 December 2009, 11:38 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 24
|
Bump !!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 December 2009, 12:33 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Rolex Air-King
Posts: 4,468
|
Here you go...
They are all 40mm... 
__________________
Instagram: timeonhand1010 |
|
|
|
|
15 December 2009, 02:35 AM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Piacenza - Italy
Watch: sub 16610 k series
Posts: 51
|
my submariner and a GMTIIc
|
|
|
|
|
15 December 2009, 05:06 AM
|
#5 |
|
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 51,046
|
   
|
|
|
|
|
15 December 2009, 05:19 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Kansas City, MO
Watch: Daytona & Sub Date
Posts: 256
|
here are some pictures of my new sub!
   
__________________
Johnny Bench called SS Daytona w/ White Dial (116520) SS Submariner Date (116610LN) |
|
|
|
|
15 December 2009, 05:45 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Ricky
Location: City of Sin
Watch: Hulk, DaytonaC, DJ
Posts: 1,149
|
I always felt that the GMT II-C was also smaller than the Sub. I got a good comparison with it side by side and kind of came up with the conclusion that the bezel on the GMT II-C is bigger. Therefore, the glass is smaller on that compared to the Sub. The Maxi dial on the it might also make a difference.
|
|
|
|
|
15 December 2009, 07:15 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: honolulu
Watch: whatever runs
Posts: 551
|
hi marcus, your keen observation is right on. the sub case is bigger - maybe not by diameter but by thickness - especially in the lugs. moreover, the caseback on the sub is also thicker. the combined effect is that the sub stands up a little more on the wrist. the ceramic gmt ii is definitely thicker. than the sub and the old gmt ii. i'm presuming that the new sub has the same case thickness as the gmtiic. here's photo of a sub nd with an expii, which shares the same case dimensions as a gmt ii.
|
|
|
|
|
15 December 2009, 11:47 PM
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 24
|
Thanks very much guys.
Can someone confirm the difference in width of glass between the GMT2c and the Sub...?? Thanks Marcus |
|
|
|
|
16 December 2009, 12:45 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East Coast
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 557
|
I don't know if you meant 11661x or 1661x Sub but here's my 16613 and GMTIIc...
To me, the GMT "looks" bigger but it's an illusion. Both are the same width. Haven't measured but I'm thinking the crystal is the same diameter on both. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
__________________
116520|116610LV|116710LN|16613|16233 244 232.30.42|3222.80 A2332212 CFX-200|Riseman|GW-M5610 |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
