The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 December 2009, 12:56 AM   #1
ryanr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 14
Icon8 GMT-Master IIc 116710 - Ceramic Bezel Fallen Out & Lost

I don't believe it...!!! I was in London on Saturday night - looked at my watch and the ceramic bezel insert had just vanished!
I've only had the watch for a very short period of time. Loved the fact that it has the new bezel - and now it's gone! Have just sold SS Daytona - so am now watchless!
I was glad to see that there have been a few cases - as Rolex will now struggle to argue that it was caused by me.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER CASES? THIS IS THE ONLY ROLEX WATCH I'VE READ ABOUT SO FAR, WHERE THE INSERT HAS FALLEN OUT.
I wish I'd taken a picture to share with you. Have now taken into local Rolex AD. What do you think are the chances of it being back before Christmas...???
They haven't been able to tell me if it's covered under the warranty as of yet...but I can't see how they can't cover it.
WILL KEEP YOU POSTED.
ryanr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:03 AM   #2
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,191
Wow, sorry to hear that. Hope your GMT is back on your wrist soon.
Good luck,
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:21 AM   #3
valentine
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Justin
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: TT Diamond DJ
Posts: 2,809
eesh...i really would like to see a photo of that...i though that the ceramic inserts were anchored in
valentine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:25 AM   #4
kzm40
"TRF" Member
 
kzm40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanr View Post
I don't believe it...!!! I was in London on Saturday night - looked at my watch and the ceramic bezel insert had just vanished!
I've only had the watch for a very short period of time. Loved the fact that it has the new bezel - and now it's gone! Have just sold SS Daytona - so am now watchless!
I was glad to see that there have been a few cases - as Rolex will now struggle to argue that it was caused by me.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER CASES? THIS IS THE ONLY ROLEX WATCH I'VE READ ABOUT SO FAR, WHERE THE INSERT HAS FALLEN OUT.
I wish I'd taken a picture to share with you. Have now taken into local Rolex AD. What do you think are the chances of it being back before Christmas...???
They haven't been able to tell me if it's covered under the warranty as of yet...but I can't see how they can't cover it.
WILL KEEP YOU POSTED.
Bad news, Was it the whole bezel or just the insert?
kzm40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:28 AM   #5
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
Very sorry to hear that I'm sure Rolex UK will be bending over backwards to get it sorted for you
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:29 AM   #6
Sub'erman
"TRF" Member
 
Sub'erman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: SK
Location: Greenland
Watch: Various SUBs
Posts: 473
Bad, bad BAD!!!
Never heard about till now!!
This one must be on Rolex!!!

Please post pics!!!
__________________
Founder and CEO of the "BLUME" Club
Rolex ref: 14060 - 92', 16600- 06', 116610LN 11' In Da House!!
He who only loves one woman and one watch, doesn't truly love women or watches!!
"Not all that is countable, counts; and not all that counts, is countable"
Sub'erman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:32 AM   #7
novae500
"TRF" Member
 
novae500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 965
wtf that is crazy... spending that much and the bezel is missing.
__________________

326933 SkyDweller, 126711 GMT II CHNR
12600 DeepSea Seadweller
14060 No Date Submariner
16710 GMT II Pepsi N-Series, Coke F Series
novae500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:32 AM   #8
groovejosh
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Josh
Location: Nashville
Watch: Rolex GMT-Master 2
Posts: 41
its got to be covered
groovejosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:34 AM   #9
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
Can anyone post a pic?? I'd go apesh!t!!!!!!!!!!
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:41 AM   #10
tkc324
"TRF" Member
 
tkc324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
Sorry to hear this.... I was just trying on a GMT2C this weekend... I guess I should wait a bit before pulling the trigger...
tkc324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:49 AM   #11
ryanr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 14
Link to picture of how watch looks with bezel off. Courtesy of SHELDONSMITH



I can guarantee that this is exactly as it looks. Only, I wasn't fortunate to witness it falling off!
ryanr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:51 AM   #12
Gerardus
"TRF" Member
 
Gerardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,131
Wtf!
__________________

♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300
Gerardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:51 AM   #13
spuds
"TRF" Member
 
spuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: West Ham! COYI!!
Posts: 7,941
sorry to hear of this friend & i hope Rolex are equally concrened too.

Between this & the 'weak points' of the new clasp perhaps the GMTc isn't quite the workhorse it's prdecessor was?.....
__________________
Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards.

Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb...........
It's about how well you can bounce!!



TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010
spuds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:52 AM   #14
ryanr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 14
Just the insert. Unsure if there was anything between bezel & insert. If there was, this is missing too! Keep a look out in "Funky Buddha", club in London! Got to be around the £400 mark at least I guess.
ryanr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 01:56 AM   #15
Watch Professor
"TRF" Member
 
Watch Professor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
Sorry to hear this. I wonder if Rolex will cover it. I wouldn't be surprised if they say no, as it has to be a maunfacturer's defect.
Watch Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 02:00 AM   #16
Carlos98326194
"TRF" Member
 
Carlos98326194's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Carlos
Location: UK
Watch: ing YOU!
Posts: 1,121
Sorry to hear this my friend. Not the first time to see this....
ROLEX should now look into it I believe. Please let us know about the decision of RSC.
__________________
16610 116400GV 116520W 00112 116710LN 16610LV 00292 116520B
Carlos98326194 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 02:04 AM   #17
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
that is shocking....not good at all...sorry to hear this...keep us posted
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 02:17 AM   #18
TSts
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: So-Cal USA
Posts: 1,067
Bummer, sorry to hear that, I hope Rolex takes care of you. I'll let you know if, and when, mine falls out - the I'll play the lottery
__________________

116710LN
116300blro
TSts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 02:41 AM   #19
HDHNTER
"TRF" Member
 
HDHNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
I hope RSC does right by you.
HDHNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 02:59 AM   #20
BASSETHOUNDS
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Tristan
Location: GIRONA , SPAIN
Watch: 116520/660/710/334
Posts: 7,147
A GMT2c again ! Remember my thread last week ? : http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=103984
Mine is arriving in 9 days ....
BASSETHOUNDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 03:19 AM   #21
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by kzm40 View Post
Bad news, Was it the whole bezel or just the insert?
Would have to be the entire bezel. I don't see how that Ceramic insert could be separated from the solid steel bezel.

To the OP: Sorry, buddy, bit of a shocker there. Can't imagine how that could have happened unless you happened to be walking in a very crowded place and accidentally & unknowingly had a very violent brush against someone in the crowd.

Hope it's all sorted out soon enough.

Good luck - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 03:40 AM   #22
ryanr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 14
Definitely no untoward contact with anyone / anything! 100% sure of that!
Bezel insert lost. Bezel itself still attached to watch and still turns the full 24 clicks.
Anyone know how insert is (should be) held in place?
ryanr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 03:52 AM   #23
JUSTROLEXES
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
JUSTROLEXES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 51,046
Oups that hurts, are you the original owner? did you buy it new?
I've never seen it before, could you post some pics
JUSTROLEXES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 04:12 AM   #24
ryanr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 14
Found a pic from Sheldonsmith

This is not my watch - but is the same model and looks EXACTLY the same - guaranteed. Gutted I did not take a picture prior to taking it to my A.D.
Regards

http://www.minus4plus6.com/images/GM.../watchhead.jpg

ryanr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 04:27 AM   #25
TSts
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: So-Cal USA
Posts: 1,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanr View Post
Definitely no untoward contact with anyone / anything! 100% sure of that!
Bezel insert lost. Bezel itself still attached to watch and still turns the full 24 clicks.
Anyone know how insert is (should be) held in place?
Possibly Rolex is relying on an interference fit between the ceramic and steel. I don't know what angles Rolex chose between the two materials in order to have the correct seating pressure. In the products my company produce we seat steel to steel and the tolerance windows are known. Yet since ceramic is not very flexible, if at all, I imagine the seating pressure window is small and the seating pressure would have to be kept by the steel, thus the allowable dimension is critical, and small, to begin with.

With this there are two theories:

1. Was your ceramic insert too small?
2. Is the bezel in which the insert seats and is 'gripped' by, too big?

I'd ask for a new bezel - the complete bezel, not just a new ceramic disc - if your insert seat is too big the ceramic disc will fall out again.
__________________

116710LN
116300blro
TSts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 04:30 AM   #26
ryanr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 14
Thanks
That's very interesting
I'll wait for the RSC to contact me, and will then discuss it further with them
Thanks everyone for your help
ryanr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 04:33 AM   #27
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanr View Post
Thanks
That's very interesting
I'll wait for the RSC to contact me, and will then discuss it further with them
Thanks everyone for your help
Would be very interesting to see a pic of your watch......see what you can do.

Thanks - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 07:01 AM   #28
MikeJaye
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 675
Even if you are not covered Rolex warranty you should be covered by UK statutory consumer law. Is it reasonable that the insert fell off...no, so they should fix
or replace.
MikeJaye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 07:07 AM   #29
Wolfgang427
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Wolfgang427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
Wow, first time I hear of a bezel insert just falling out. Should be covered under the warranty unless you dinged it up against something really hard I would guess.
Wolfgang427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 07:23 AM   #30
lobsterlee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: england
Watch: GMT Master 16700
Posts: 37
Sorry to hear about your loss... I know how gutted you must have felt.

Makes me feel slightly better that my 16700 bezel insert is only going to cost approx £25 fitted from Rolex Bexley while I wait. It came back from ad service with an miniscule scratch (huge to me!) and they claim they could not have done it!!! I know it was not there when I dropped the watch into them... but for sake of £25 i'd rather take her home to rolex...
lobsterlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.