The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Grand Seiko & Seiko Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 December 2009, 09:14 AM   #1
snowbird
"TRF" Member
 
snowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
Seiko Kinetic

Does anyone have one of these? What do you think?

Costco had these on sale (model #SKA347, 40mm stainless with black dial) so I just got one and am interested to try it out.

The description says it uses motion to power the quartz movement so it has a power reserve measured in months and doesn't have a battery . . . seems like pretty interesting technology.
snowbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 09:23 AM   #2
Safetrends
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
I have a 2001 Seiko Kinetic Auto Relay 5J22-0A50. Back then it was 600.00 and worth every penny. I wear this when I am doing hard labor tasks which would make a normal watch fail. It runs great and keeps excellent time. I have owned a Seiko for twenty five years it is a good work horse. The watch can be left for days without winding down, it has stored energy that makes it on time for days and weeks at at time.

My two Rolex watches are used for: 1.Dress up and 2.Normal daily wear. And since my 21 year old son is doing all of the dirty work now I really do not worry about wearing my Rolex watch more often.
Safetrends is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 09:25 AM   #3
snowbird
"TRF" Member
 
snowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Safetrends View Post
I have a 2001 Seiko Kinetic Auto Relay 5J22-0A50. Back then it was 600.00 and worth every penny. I wear this when I am doing hard labor tasks which would make a normal watch fail. It runs great and keeps excellent time. I have owned a Seiko for twenty five years it is a good work horse. The watch can be left for days without winding down, it has stored energy that makes it on time for days and weeks at at time.

My two Rolex watches are used for: 1.Dress up and 2.Normal daily wear. And since my 21 year old son is doing all of the dirty work now I really do not worry about wearing my Rolex watch more often.
Thanks, that's good to hear that the power reserve works as advertised.
snowbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 09:30 AM   #4
safd09
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Shan
Location: texas
Posts: 18
Have had 2 kinetics. Mine were the early models that used a capacitor to store the energy. It was suppose to "run forever" without ever needing a battery. Well... the technology wasn't as advanced as their claims. So in the early 2000's they switched to a lithium-ion rechargeable battery that stores the energy. Takes significantly more movement to be fully charged, but has a very long power reserve. Seikos are great watches, but their licensed service center, COSERV is terrible. They are slow, expensive, and not very customer friendly. IMHO, Citizens are a better choice and similar in price. Also, all of the automatic Seikos I have keep terrible time.
safd09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 09:40 AM   #5
snowbird
"TRF" Member
 
snowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
That's too bad about the service center, hopefully I won't have to use it.
snowbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2010, 03:54 AM   #6
snowbird
"TRF" Member
 
snowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
I've been wearing the watch I mentioned above occasionally for a few weeks now and it seems like a good watch. So far the power reserve seems to work as advertised and the lume is easy to see at night.
snowbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2010, 04:28 AM   #7
Double_J
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 98
I have one purchased a couple of years ago. I think its the SNL021 or something like that. Thought it looked neat when I bought it but quickly changed my mind and it's been sitting in a drawer ever since.

That said, the technology seems great. It's kind of a pain to get it fully charged from a full stop (something like 500 back and forth waves to build up the power reserve) but it does stay running a very long time. I forget the exact period but it's at least a couple of months.

If only the darned thing weren't so ugly.
Double_J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2010, 04:20 PM   #8
snowbird
"TRF" Member
 
snowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
Yes it does seem like a chore to fully charge it once the power reserve runs down, I read that in the instruction book about swinging it a few hundred times. Fortunately it came fully charged so I'm hoping all I have to do is wear it occasionally to keep it that way . . .
snowbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2010, 05:19 PM   #9
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowbird View Post
Yes it does seem like a chore to fully charge it once the power reserve runs down, I read that in the instruction book about swinging it a few hundred times. Fortunately it came fully charged so I'm hoping all I have to do is wear it occasionally to keep it that way . . .
You do need to keep these charged. If you don't wear them for a while the rechargeable battery loses efficiency.
Easy to replace but a nuisance and a cost.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2010, 02:09 AM   #10
snowbird
"TRF" Member
 
snowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
You do need to keep these charged. If you don't wear them for a while the rechargeable battery loses efficiency.
Easy to replace but a nuisance and a cost.
What has your experience been in terms of how often you need to wear it to keep it charged?

So far once a week or so has been good enough to keep mine showing as fully charged but I haven't had the watch very long . . .
snowbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2010, 04:34 PM   #11
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
I have one, it's excellent. I set my other watches by it.

But I can't seem to wear it on its own.
Attached Images
 
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2010, 04:45 PM   #12
snowbird
"TRF" Member
 
snowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
Nice picture (both of those watches)!
snowbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.