ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Jackxv · 11 March 2010, 10:19 PM

The date magnification on the 1680 subs seems a lot bigger (3X) then on the other models (even with plexi)

I am the only one noticing ?

The cyclops is filled all over.

Jack

jets · 12 March 2010, 02:03 AM

Could be that the lens is thinner than newer ones. The cyclops being physically closer to the date wheel makes it appear larger. Just a stab in the dark...

snow_rocks · 12 March 2010, 02:16 AM

I noticed that with my 1680 and my 16750.

It probably has to do with how close the plexi is to the date.

The sapphire crystals are smaller by comparison as well.

11 March 2010, 10:19 PM	#1
Jackxv "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Netherlands Posts: 969	Date magnification The date magnification on the 1680 subs seems a lot bigger (3X) then on the other models (even with plexi) I am the only one noticing ? The cyclops is filled all over. Jack

12 March 2010, 02:03 AM	#2
jets "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Mario Location: CANADA Posts: 2,483	Could be that the lens is thinner than newer ones. The cyclops being physically closer to the date wheel makes it appear larger. Just a stab in the dark... __________________ ♛ DJII 116234 · Submariner 126610LV · Yacht Master 42 226659 ✿ Pelagos 25600TN Ω X-33 Speedmaster Skywalker · 1861 Speedmaster Modsukoshi · SMP 2254.50 · SMP 2230.50 NAC · Seamaster 300 166.0324 · Genève 162.037 Seiko SLA033 Willard · SKX007

12 March 2010, 02:16 AM	#3
snow_rocks Banned Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Rick Location: At what TIME?!!! Watch: the SKY tonite! Posts: 3,225	I noticed that with my 1680 and my 16750. It probably has to do with how close the plexi is to the date. The sapphire crystals are smaller by comparison as well.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)