ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 March 2010, 01:36 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: anywhere but here
Posts: 690
|
1655 What do you think?
Experts pls share your thought on this... is the font correct for a 1982 watch?
http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-Rolex-16...item2c53a24f4d |
22 March 2010, 02:04 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Skunk Hollow, TX
Watch: Rolex 116613LN Sub
Posts: 2,198
|
I think you're very lucky my wife would kill me if I bought another Rolex. I wouldn't think twice other wise about bidding on it.
__________________
JJ ........... Still missing you bro. May you enjoy the eternal peace the almighty has blessed you with. |
22 March 2010, 02:06 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: blaine
Location: memphis
Watch: my next find
Posts: 1,060
|
like,
i like it!! soon, i see one like that in my future
|
22 March 2010, 02:13 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Skunk Hollow, TX
Watch: Rolex 116613LN Sub
Posts: 2,198
|
When a seller uses close ups like that of the dial, along with everything else shown in the listing, that really lowers the odds of it being a scam.
__________________
JJ ........... Still missing you bro. May you enjoy the eternal peace the almighty has blessed you with. |
22 March 2010, 03:03 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
|
Some nice shots on that listing
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth |
22 March 2010, 03:40 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: anywhere but here
Posts: 690
|
thanks alot for replying. appreciate it alot!
|
22 March 2010, 04:34 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
VERY nice watch .... but be aware that the hands are luminova (if that matters to you).
|
22 March 2010, 05:03 PM | #8 | |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,587
|
Quote:
The lug at 2 O'Clock appears to be a little on the thin side indicating that it has had some significant polishing. The bracelet is not correct (although some say that the Submariner bracelet was offered as an option at the time) for historical purposes. Also the bracelet looks to have some issues of significant wear & tear. When the watch was submitted to rolex for servicing I suspect that the bracelet was not submitted and the head only was submitted to Rolex. I would doubt whether it would be safe for a watch of this value to be worn with that bracelet (look carefully) wear is quite significant.
__________________
Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim |
|
22 March 2010, 05:14 PM | #9 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,587
|
Note that the seller says that the bracelet is not part of the auction.
But the bracelet and endlinks are available for purchase for an additional $500. Many bidders may overlook this and bid higher thinking the bracelet is included. This is a questionable practice IMHO to depict a watch with the bracelet attached and describe 'the watch' instead of 'the watch head'. Some people will no doubt fail to see/read the small print of (bracelet and end links not included). Thus they may bid more than may otherwise be the case. The seller doesn't care because he just wants the highest price and can say to the buyer afterwards, "Well I stated in the auction the bracelet was not included." Anyway, it does have some nice original attributes .
__________________
Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim |
22 March 2010, 11:44 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Skunk Hollow, TX
Watch: Rolex 116613LN Sub
Posts: 2,198
|
Why NOT to use an RSC for vintage !!
This is a classic example of why not to use the RSC to recon a vintage watch. There is now no way to get back the original hour/minuet hands, 24 hour hand, sweep hand. Rolex will not return them. Thus, the new owner will have need to seek out someone such as the forums own Steve Mulholland3 in order to return the watch to it's original state.
__________________
JJ ........... Still missing you bro. May you enjoy the eternal peace the almighty has blessed you with. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.