ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JCB62 · 17 April 2010, 04:36 AM

Was it ever determined in Basel if the 14060M will continue once the new Sub comes out? I'm struggling on whether to keep my 14060 U Serial No date. If it's going to be discontinued, I'd probably me more likely to keep it. The fact is the GMTIIc and even the new Sub are really singing to me, I love the Super case. So I'm considering flipping. I love my Sub, but I really do miss the date function. I'm even starting to fall for the TT look which never really appealed to me as a younger man. Now I appreciate the casual elegance of the gold and SS together.

therolexguy · 17 April 2010, 04:40 AM

Hard call really. But since you already have a GMT with date, I'd hold on to the no date Sub for the different look at least until you can "see and feel" the new Sub. And if you fall in love with the new one, trade it in or get a GMTIIC. jmho

smallcandle · 17 April 2010, 06:10 AM

I think you should only keep a watch if you truly love it, not based on whether it'll be discontinued or not. If the IIc is calling and you're convinced that it will get more wrist time, then I would think flipping your ND is a good move. JMHO.

Oh, and I may be wrong but I think I remember hearing that the 14060M would be continuing even after the new sub arrives.

kcmo · 17 April 2010, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smallcandle

I think you should only keep a watch if you truly love it, not based on whether it'll be discontinued or not. If the IIc is calling and you're convinced that it will get more wrist time, then I would think flipping your ND is a good move. JMHO.

Oh, and I may be wrong but I think I remember hearing that the 14060M would be continuing even after the new sub arrives.

Agree!

mike · 17 April 2010, 06:43 AM

As I understand it, it continues to be a regular production reference.

donas · 18 April 2010, 03:03 PM

Keep it! I traded mine in December and have been regretting it since.

mikester · 18 April 2010, 03:30 PM

i traded mine for a sea dweller...

volkersports · 19 April 2010, 03:42 PM

I know that some folks think the high end Daytonas and the Day-Date will always be the flagship models for Rolex. Others recommend the Explorer II as the watch to keep. I believe, and I am biased, that the no-date Sub, looking much like it did fifty years ago, will be the face of Rolex 50 years from now.

Watchdog · 19 April 2010, 04:41 PM

Great watch but FLIP!

IMHO

JJ Irani · 19 April 2010, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smallcandle

I think you should only keep a watch if you truly love it, not based on whether it'll be discontinued or not. If the IIc is calling and you're convinced that it will get more wrist time, then I would think flipping your ND is a good move. JMHO.

Oh, and I may be wrong but I think I remember hearing that the 14060M would be continuing even after the new sub arrives.

Makes sense to me!!

Psmith · 19 April 2010, 05:16 PM

GMT IIc is a stunner

Cheers

taxico · 19 April 2010, 07:25 PM

i don't have a wide varied collection, but i would keep the sub if i don't need the money right now.

nauticajoe · 19 April 2010, 09:24 PM

If you think the No Date is no longer smiling back, I'd flip it. I agree with prev. posts; don't use production as your decision-making factor...you may regret it.
Good luck!

17 April 2010, 04:36 AM	#1
JCB62 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Jack Location: SE Michigan Watch: 1985 GMT Master SS Posts: 322	Keep the no date Suhb, or flip it? Was it ever determined in Basel if the 14060M will continue once the new Sub comes out? I'm struggling on whether to keep my 14060 U Serial No date. If it's going to be discontinued, I'd probably me more likely to keep it. The fact is the GMTIIc and even the new Sub are really singing to me, I love the Super case. So I'm considering flipping. I love my Sub, but I really do miss the date function. I'm even starting to fall for the TT look which never really appealed to me as a younger man. Now I appreciate the casual elegance of the gold and SS together. __________________ JCB62 Rolex GMT Master Pepsi 16750 SS Rolex Submariner 14060 No Date SS Tag Heuer Aquaracer 500M

17 April 2010, 06:10 AM	#3
smallcandle "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Kansas Watch: 16610, Omega PO Posts: 1,898	I think you should only keep a watch if you truly love it, not based on whether it'll be discontinued or not. If the IIc is calling and you're convinced that it will get more wrist time, then I would think flipping your ND is a good move. JMHO. Oh, and I may be wrong but I think I remember hearing that the 14060M would be continuing even after the new sub arrives. __________________ Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown...

19 April 2010, 05:16 PM	#11
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	GMT IIc is a stunner Cheers __________________

17 April 2010, 04:40 AM	#2
therolexguy 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Todd Location: US Posts: 3,528	Hard call really. But since you already have a GMT with date, I'd hold on to the no date Sub for the different look at least until you can "see and feel" the new Sub. And if you fall in love with the new one, trade it in or get a GMTIIC. jmho

17 April 2010, 06:43 AM	#5
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	As I understand it, it continues to be a regular production reference.

18 April 2010, 03:03 PM	#6
donas Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Wade Location: TN Watch: 116619 Posts: 2,659	Keep it! I traded mine in December and have been regretting it since.

18 April 2010, 03:30 PM	#7
mikester 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: San Francisco Posts: 2,357	i traded mine for a sea dweller...

19 April 2010, 03:42 PM	#8
volkersports Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Nevada Posts: 132	I know that some folks think the high end Daytonas and the Day-Date will always be the flagship models for Rolex. Others recommend the Explorer II as the watch to keep. I believe, and I am biased, that the no-date Sub, looking much like it did fifty years ago, will be the face of Rolex 50 years from now.

19 April 2010, 04:41 PM	#9
Watchdog "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Junkyard Dog Location: The Doghouse Watch: I can't tell time Posts: 6,822	Great watch but FLIP! IMHO

19 April 2010, 07:25 PM	#12
taxico "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Asia / USA Watch: on my wrist! Posts: 113	i don't have a wide varied collection, but i would keep the sub if i don't need the money right now.

19 April 2010, 09:24 PM	#13
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	If you think the No Date is no longer smiling back, I'd flip it. I agree with prev. posts; don't use production as your decision-making factor...you may regret it. Good luck!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)