ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 February 2007, 08:56 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,380
|
Some photo critique required....
Hey photo experts
I went to Williamstown a few days ago and tried shooting some night scenes of the bay with the city in the background.. oh and a few boats too. I only had the kit lens on me so zoom not sooo great... anyone that knows this spot can vouch how far the city is from where I was standing... Now the boats are a bit blurry due to the long shutter time... thats cool I get that. Now the bit I'm not sure about is the large rings around the lights... is this a lens flare/dirty lens issue or to do with the exposure? The rings were visible regardless of what I shot and at what exposure... I've never had them appear this bad before - lens??? I've been practising for my HK trip on March 3rd.. gotta get some good Hong Kong Habour shots in!!!! Here's another one Last edited by amanda; 20 February 2007 at 09:03 PM.. Reason: i think my keyboard batteries are dying... |
21 February 2007, 01:49 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Gerardo
Location: Here
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 32,098
|
Hi there. I am no photo expert but like your pics!
|
21 February 2007, 01:59 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 445
|
Hey Amanda...that's a flare...usually caused by one or more of lower end lens/glass, no lens hood, lens filter, etc. You can read some more about it here...
http://www.assap.org/newsite/htmlfiles/Mists.html Nice shot...you can easily clean out the flare in Photoshop or the like if you want. I'd say straighten the horizon, up the exposure slightly with a curve and sharpen. Happy to take a pass at it for you if you'd like. Just let me know... |
21 February 2007, 02:08 AM | #4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
They are very nice and I actually don't mind the flare that much.....gives it an artsy sort of look.
|
21 February 2007, 02:09 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
|
I kinda like the flares myself.
But like Charles said, 5 minutes in Photoshop can get rid of them if you want to.
__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. Yoda, Jedi Master CHIP Member # 87 |
21 February 2007, 02:23 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
|
__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. Yoda, Jedi Master CHIP Member # 87 |
21 February 2007, 02:30 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Victor
Location: Austin
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 116
|
May the Mac be with You
Hey there Chip, I looked at your other pics - Excellent work! Gotta ask you about your avatar: is Yoda a Mac guy? If he is, then I suspect you are too? I do my work on a dual 2GHz G5... Greetings from Austin! How's Big D?
-V |
21 February 2007, 02:41 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In my own world
Posts: 595
|
pretty cool
Do you have a UV filter on your lens?
|
21 February 2007, 02:53 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
|
Quote:
Mac all the way Brother!!
__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. Yoda, Jedi Master CHIP Member # 87 |
|
21 February 2007, 03:11 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Gerardo
Location: Here
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 32,098
|
|
21 February 2007, 04:15 AM | #11 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
21 February 2007, 04:20 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Manuel_Winde
Location: London N1- UK
Watch: Reverso Duoface
Posts: 578
|
i think it looks cool- i would have pretended i did it in purpose
__________________
This confession has meant nothing |
21 February 2007, 04:32 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Victor
Location: Austin
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 116
|
ALLRIGHT!!! Mac-Rolex Guys IN THE HOUSE!!
-V |
21 February 2007, 05:07 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Gerardo
Location: Here
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 32,098
|
|
21 February 2007, 05:24 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
|
I've got my MacBook Pro and my iMac G5 with iSight (which I am selling).
|
21 February 2007, 05:25 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
|
I've got my MacBook Pro and my iMac G5 with iSight (which I am selling). I've been a Mac user since the first macintosh.
|
21 February 2007, 05:30 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
|
Over Christmas I got the $1999 MacBook Pro because I had a 25% off coupon. Who can pass that up!
|
21 February 2007, 07:45 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2006
Real Name: Urs
Location: QLD AU
Watch: Omega x 2
Posts: 2,046
|
hmm... interesting shots amanda, I like them! Especially the one with the tilted boat.
I wouldn't worry about the flares too much, but as patrick said try sticking a UV filter on your lens. Also, try doing a few spot-metered off the water shots, you will need a tripod as it's going to be an 4-8 second exposure, but you'd be amazed at how much colour there is in the world at night. now show us more!
__________________
Rock the Casbah! |
21 February 2007, 09:16 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,380
|
Thaks for all the comments guys.... to answer the questions/comments
I posted them exactly as they came out of the camera, knew the horizon was slopey but didnt bother fixing it! Call it lazy ... No, no UV filter. Had a lens hood (but at night that wouldnt make any difference would it?) on and had the camera mounted on a Tripod... These exposures were long.. most of them were 10+ seconds.. maybe a bit too long? I really need to get my screen calibrated.. I'm looking at them at work now and they look totally different than at home. The second shot especially looks darker than I remembered it! I am thinking of getting a Macbook when my current PC lease expires... given I only surf the net and am more interested in the photo stuff.. a Mac would probably be better for me. I dont play PC games or use PC specific software Last edited by amanda; 21 February 2007 at 09:17 AM.. Reason: added the Mac part |
21 February 2007, 09:23 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,380
|
OH CRAP I forgot to respond to Chip - Thanks Chip, your amendments make a huge difference to the shot!!!
|
25 February 2007, 01:06 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
25 February 2007, 09:39 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,380
|
Yep I used a Canon 350D on a tripod nko51 to even get those shots!!!
|
25 February 2007, 10:58 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
|
I don't mind the rings either, Amanda. Overall, a great shot, but lighting is understandably a challenge.
You would obviously get better results with your 50mm f/1.8 lens. The kit lens' f/4.0 aperture is way too small for that kind of shot IMHO. A filter would help, and also take your shots in RAW and use the bundled Canon software to post-process. That ought to give you an extra two F-stops of brightness, over and above what you get with the 1.8 lens.
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time. |
25 February 2007, 04:03 PM | #24 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,380
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.