ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
17 August 2010, 11:15 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 243
|
If / When there is a price jump of 13% in Sept on Rolex, does that mean...
If / When there is a price jump of 13% in Sept on Rolex, does that mean that prices on used Rolex go up as well.
Speaking of the DSSD in particular. Thnx Mondo |
17 August 2010, 11:35 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
14% ;-)
|
17 August 2010, 11:44 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: ♛
Posts: 4,408
|
Your AD told you that?
__________________
|
17 August 2010, 11:46 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
|
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
17 August 2010, 11:53 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Ritchie
Location: NYC
Watch: Holy Trinity
Posts: 407
|
Well logically yes the resale price follows the retail trend but I doubt the used watches will go up overnight. 13% isn't that bad of an increase if it's going to happen at all. Unless you are looking to get a watch over $15k then that might hurt a bit
|
18 August 2010, 04:34 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 448
|
I think that is a serious mistake by Rolex in this Economy. That means a 7000 GMTIIc will be 7910 retail. Sales will suffer. People will hang on to the watches they have.
|
18 August 2010, 05:32 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega
Posts: 1,607
|
I think the prices are already way high for what you get. I stopped buying Rolexes back in 2005. But, yes the used prices should slowly and probably at a less percentage go up in value.
__________________
Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52 |
18 August 2010, 07:02 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,468
|
Jump in when you can
I wanted to buy a Lange 1 about 10 years ago. They cost around $13,000-14,000, which was a lot of money, but if I really wanted it, I could have afforded it. I never got one.
Now they cost around $28,000 and frankly, for me, I would not spend that much on a watch. The lesson I draw is if you really want something and you can afford it now, it probably will not get cheaper over time. |
18 August 2010, 07:25 AM | #9 | |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 51,110
|
Quote:
I don't think Rolex will have an increase this year since all the new models that are out got a bump... But if and when that happens it does reflect on the used market.
__________________
Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active |
|
18 August 2010, 11:19 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: R.J.
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,546
|
Quote:
There was an article in the last issue of 'Watch Journal' and it showed GROWTH in sales almost across the board. especially the companies that expanded in Asia... Bottom line is that Rolex probably cares little about US economy, and if they can get away with raising prices in stronger markets, they will raise prices almost universally to keep worldwide prices in a reasonable homogeny... I think that in Canada the GMT has already received a price boost to be a bit closer to the new Sub.. I think my AD told me 8250 for the sub and 8000 for the new GMT.. to think that I got my GMT for 5600 just 2 yrs ago... The comment about buying when you can is dead on... USED GMT-c rarely go for less than 5600!! |
|
18 August 2010, 12:45 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: On Earth
Watch: A Few
Posts: 1,510
|
rolex has already increased its price. like tony mentioned, all the new models coming out got a bump on their price tags. the new sub-c retails around $7,300 is already a big difference from the classic 16610. with the expected new explorer 2 coming (still a rumor) next year, i am expecting the price to be a little less than the gmt2c. of course, the updated 39mm explorer 1 costs as well.
|
18 August 2010, 01:47 PM | #12 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: N/A
Location: N/A
Watch: 2010 SS/Black SubC
Posts: 773
|
example
Quote:
Sub-c for example... If the average annual increase over the next 10 years is 10% - the current $7,250 Sub-c in one decade will retail for $18,800. I don't foresee Rolex making any major changes to the Sub-c for 10+ years. The time to buy is now. |
|
18 August 2010, 09:17 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
Such an increase is foolhardy and yes it would firm up the used market.
|
18 August 2010, 09:43 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
[QUOTE=SUPERDOC;2002772]Luxury items usually don't suffer as much as you'd think.
There was an article in the last issue of 'Watch Journal' and it showed GROWTH in sales almost across the board. especially the companies that expanded in Asia... Bottom line is that Rolex probably cares little about US economy, and if they can get away with raising prices in stronger markets, they will raise prices almost universally to keep worldwide prices in a reasonable homogeny... Very true. The Asian markets, especially China, Singapore, and Hong Kong are driving the luxury markets, and Rolex is at the front of the line in sales. The "Watch Time " article is an excellent resource, documenting these growth changes. |
18 August 2010, 09:49 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Toronto, ON
Watch: 116234
Posts: 4,150
|
I can't wait for the day when we see a $10,000.00 SS Datejust.. I'll be long gone by then lol
__________________
116234 - Blue Concentric Dial - Fluted Bezel - Oyster Bracelet Tudor Black Bay 54 - Rubber Strap |
18 August 2010, 10:17 PM | #16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
Quote:
no matter how much Rolex increases the already rediculously expensive Rolex watches - the second hand market will obbey the demand and supply theory, to give you an example just try and sell a mid-size 18k gold datejust with a riveted oyster bracelet and every one will cry.... once the hear the offer to buy...and god forbid if it is one without a date...then gold weight will be the only offer. |
|
19 August 2010, 12:00 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Bob
Location: Dallas, Texas
Watch: Daytona Meteorite
Posts: 3,417
|
it means, stock up now! get as many as you can afford....
__________________
meteor flying to Earth onto my wrist... 116509 Daytona Meteorite, 116520 Daytona Black, 116710 GMTIIC, 16013 DATEJUST, CARTIER SANTOS 100 W20090X8, IWC Big Pilot, IWC Top Gun "Everything works out in the end. If it hasn't worked out, it's not the end." |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.