ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SaddleSC · 9 October 2010, 04:47 AM

Hi guys,
I absolutely love the "new" 16600 M-Series Sea Dweller that I acquired earlier in the week. It has not left my wrist since it arrived. In fact, I am starting to get the feeling that I have found the perfect daily wearer for me.

My interest in future Rolex purchases has diminished to the point of complete apathy and last night I even considered consolidating my collection a bit. My question is this...has anyone ever found a watch that they loved so much that they bought an exact duplicate to keep in the safe to have use of in the future?

Because the 16600 has been discontinued, but there are still a few LNIB to be had, I am actually considering picking up another one so that I will never be without my beloved Sea Dweller. I need you guys to assure me that I am not crazy, or at least confirm that I am but support the decision anyway!

(As a side note...anyone that has any reservations whatsoever about the wearability of the 16600 due to the weight/balance, just go out and buy one. I have a 6.75" wrist and find the 16600 to be the most comfortable Rolex sport model I have ever owned. It is true perfection.)

AirKing527 · 9 October 2010, 04:51 AM

if you have the funds, go for it

dieseldragon · 9 October 2010, 04:56 AM

I had a Sub 16610 (now sold), a Sub 14060, a Tudor Sub 76100 and a Tudor Sub 79090.

4 stainless subs at one time (although each a bit different) is quite a lot of repetition!

Richard. · 9 October 2010, 04:59 AM

Sounds very rational to me.

burger'n'fries · 9 October 2010, 05:13 AM

Why not? If your feelings change in the future you could always flip it for something else.

rdGOnoles · 9 October 2010, 05:22 AM

I have also considered this

joeychitwood · 9 October 2010, 05:27 AM

Not exactly the same watch, I have a black 16613 and a blue 16613. Given the durability of Rolexes, I'm not very worried about one of my watches dying or wearing out.

chris russell · 9 October 2010, 05:30 AM

I have both a LNIB SD and the new Sub-c. Does that count? 98.6743% of people don't see the difference anyway.

EchoBlueUK · 9 October 2010, 05:30 AM

If I could afford 2 of the same and sell the idea to my wife i probably would but there are so many other ones I'd like to get first.

dddrees · 9 October 2010, 05:35 AM

For me variety is the spice of life. But to each his own, and I can understand why someone else might choose this path.

Scuba_Sam · 9 October 2010, 05:48 AM

I can see doing this in case your watch gets lost or stolen, but as you know with proper care you watch will last longer than you will... but do whatever helps you sleep at night :)

RRGHOST1 · 9 October 2010, 05:58 AM

Yes you are crazy,but thats what Rolex do when you get the bug. I wouldn't get the same model as it has been pointed out the one you have got will probably outlast your lifetime, but hell go for it. We are all passing through life , and if it makes you happy and puts a smile on your face,do it.

DS_Obsessed · 9 October 2010, 06:08 AM

Probably wouldn't buy a duplicate just to have it. I would consider it as a heirloom or a speculative investment. Just too many watches out there that I desire to go with just one.

tkc324 · 9 October 2010, 06:11 AM

I would totally do it if I love a certain watch that much~ Go for it!

nauticajoe · 9 October 2010, 06:11 AM

Go for it!

GradyPhilpott · 9 October 2010, 06:12 AM

How old are you?

Why do you think the one you have won't last?

If you have the bucks, go for it, but I think you should hold off for awhile and see if it's just infatuation.

I mean, you really can reasonably expect to bequeath that watch in good working order, even if you're in your twenties.

Casey VP-26 · 9 October 2010, 06:13 AM

Go for it!!! I have done the same thing on many different items, and if ever lost or stolen or whatever, it is great to reach for the backup. Enjoy (plus its probably better then money these days)

dieseldragon · 9 October 2010, 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris russell

I have both a LNIB SD and the new Sub-c. Does that count? 98.6743% of people don't see the difference anyway.

76.4% of people know that statistics can be made up to prove anything..

SaddleSC · 9 October 2010, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

How old are you?

Why do you think the one you have won't last?

If you have the bucks, go for it, but I think you should hold off for awhile and see if it's just infatuation.

I mean, you really can reasonably expect to bequeath that watch in good working order, even if you're in your twenties.

I am in my 30s

It is not a longevity issue at all. It is more an issue of it being stolen/lost, etc. and being unable to replace it with a brand new model in the future.

Also, though, I think it would be pretty darn cool to pull a brand new 16600 out of the safe on my 55th birthday and strap a mint "vintage" SD onto my arm. Seriously...how many people on this very forum would like to reach into their safe right now and pull out a brand new 5513 or 1665?

PeterT · 9 October 2010, 06:28 AM

I have 3 x GMT II but they all have different insert colours.
They could all be converted to the same colour but I would have great difficulty choosing!

Peter

GradyPhilpott · 9 October 2010, 06:28 AM

You made your case.

By all means, go for it.

TSW · 9 October 2010, 06:36 AM

My twins

SLS · 9 October 2010, 07:07 AM

I think I would just buy a few back up bracelets so the codes match up. I'm not really sure what a back watch would do for me, I would rather be wearing a watch that I am able to associate some memories with.
Scott

sakuraba · 9 October 2010, 09:44 AM

The 16600 is a very tough watch, I seriously doubt you'll ever be without one unless you count the 6 weeks it will spend at the RSC for servicing.

If you're itching to spend some cash, a wise investment IMHO would be a matte 16660. Nearly identical to your SD, but with the potential to become collectible.

Just my

Jason71 · 9 October 2010, 12:53 PM

I have triplets, but one is a bit of an odd-ball

I also have 2 LV subs.... I say go for it.

MortgageGuy · 9 October 2010, 01:14 PM

Your analogy of pulling a BNIB 16600 out of the safe in 25 years is pretty damn cool.... I had never thought of that before. Problem for me is I could never leave the stikers on it and not wear it even if I had 40 of them

It would be BNIB for about 6 months max with me

If it is just to have I would do it. If your thinking about making $$$ off it in 25 years I would say do not. Take the $6k, invest in and in 25 years you should be able to buy 3 of them

MortgageGuy · 9 October 2010, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jclevoy

I have triplets, but one is a bit of an odd-ball

I also have 2 LV subs.... I say go for it.

Love the SD's

All the same yet all different, great collection

Singslinger · 9 October 2010, 01:47 PM

I haven't but I have two Rolex-loving friends who have. One bought two Submariners and another two LVs for roughly the same reasons as you, so rest assured - you're not alone in your craziness!

xjeeunitx · 9 October 2010, 02:01 PM

Personally, I would get something else! Diversify your collection if you have the funds but in the end, it's really up to you brother!

Shade · 9 October 2010, 02:12 PM

I don't see why not, as long as you have the funds for it, and you seem to love it so much. I say go for it!

But if it were me, I'd resort to a "brother/sister" of the watch. Like a sub or a dssd. Gives me a few options that way..

9 October 2010, 04:47 AM	#1
SaddleSC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Charles B Location: GMT -7 Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 6,131	Anyone bought a twin of their favorite? Hi guys, I absolutely love the "new" 16600 M-Series Sea Dweller that I acquired earlier in the week. It has not left my wrist since it arrived. In fact, I am starting to get the feeling that I have found the perfect daily wearer for me. My interest in future Rolex purchases has diminished to the point of complete apathy and last night I even considered consolidating my collection a bit. My question is this...has anyone ever found a watch that they loved so much that they bought an exact duplicate to keep in the safe to have use of in the future? Because the 16600 has been discontinued, but there are still a few LNIB to be had, I am actually considering picking up another one so that I will never be without my beloved Sea Dweller. I need you guys to assure me that I am not crazy, or at least confirm that I am but support the decision anyway! (As a side note...anyone that has any reservations whatsoever about the wearability of the 16600 due to the weight/balance, just go out and buy one. I have a 6.75" wrist and find the 16600 to be the most comfortable Rolex sport model I have ever owned. It is true perfection.) __________________ Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB

9 October 2010, 04:56 AM	#3
dieseldragon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Ian Location: Spain Watch: Ω & ♛ Posts: 1,321	I had a Sub 16610 (now sold), a Sub 14060, a Tudor Sub 76100 and a Tudor Sub 79090. 4 stainless subs at one time (although each a bit different) is quite a lot of repetition! __________________ Rolex GMT, Zenith Chronomaster Sport, Zenith Pilot type 20 40mm, IWC mkXVI, Tudor BB58, Glashütte Original SeaQ 39. 5

9 October 2010, 05:35 AM	#10
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	For me variety is the spice of life. But to each his own, and I can understand why someone else might choose this path. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

9 October 2010, 06:08 AM	#13
DS_Obsessed "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: J Location: Texas Watch: 116660 V Posts: 438	Probably wouldn't buy a duplicate just to have it. I would consider it as a heirloom or a speculative investment. Just too many watches out there that I desire to go with just one. __________________ _______________________________ Currently wearing : 116000 V / 116660 V / PAM 292 / AP royal Oak Offshore Safari / Royal Oak Offshore Volcano / Tudor heritage / 116520 “For the strength of the Pack is the Wolf, and the strength of the Wolf is the Pack”

9 October 2010, 06:12 AM	#16
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,460	How old are you? Why do you think the one you have won't last? If you have the bucks, go for it, but I think you should hold off for awhile and see if it's just infatuation. I mean, you really can reasonably expect to bequeath that watch in good working order, even if you're in your twenties. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

9 October 2010, 04:51 AM	#2
AirKing527 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Nick Location: USA Watch: Explorer I Posts: 256	if you have the funds, go for it

9 October 2010, 04:59 AM	#4
Richard. "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: UK Posts: 969	Sounds very rational to me.

9 October 2010, 05:13 AM	#5
burger'n'fries Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: CA Watch: 42mm Exp 2 Posts: 378	Why not? If your feelings change in the future you could always flip it for something else.

9 October 2010, 05:22 AM	#6
rdGOnoles Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: NY Posts: 67	I have also considered this

9 October 2010, 05:27 AM	#7
joeychitwood "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Way Up North USA Watch: Rolexes & Tudors Posts: 6,361	Not exactly the same watch, I have a black 16613 and a blue 16613. Given the durability of Rolexes, I'm not very worried about one of my watches dying or wearing out.

9 October 2010, 05:30 AM	#8
chris russell Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Peterborough, ON Watch: your mouth. Posts: 1,023	I have both a LNIB SD and the new Sub-c. Does that count? 98.6743% of people don't see the difference anyway.

9 October 2010, 05:30 AM	#9
EchoBlueUK "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: UK Posts: 1,543	If I could afford 2 of the same and sell the idea to my wife i probably would but there are so many other ones I'd like to get first.

9 October 2010, 05:48 AM	#11
Scuba_Sam Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Sam Location: New Hampshire Watch: 16610 Sub Posts: 17	I can see doing this in case your watch gets lost or stolen, but as you know with proper care you watch will last longer than you will... but do whatever helps you sleep at night :)

9 October 2010, 05:58 AM	#12
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,997	Yes you are crazy,but thats what Rolex do when you get the bug. I wouldn't get the same model as it has been pointed out the one you have got will probably outlast your lifetime, but hell go for it. We are all passing through life , and if it makes you happy and puts a smile on your face,do it.

9 October 2010, 06:11 AM	#14
tkc324 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Tom Location: Chi town Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub Posts: 3,717	I would totally do it if I love a certain watch that much~ Go for it!

9 October 2010, 06:11 AM	#15
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Go for it!

9 October 2010, 06:13 AM	#17
Casey VP-26 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: America Posts: 2,721	Go for it!!! I have done the same thing on many different items, and if ever lost or stolen or whatever, it is great to reach for the backup. Enjoy (plus its probably better then money these days)

9 October 2010, 06:28 AM	#20
PeterT "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: England Watch: 16613 16710 16600 Posts: 1,021	I have 3 x GMT II but they all have different insert colours. They could all be converted to the same colour but I would have great difficulty choosing! Peter

9 October 2010, 06:36 AM	#22
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	My twins Attached Images __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

9 October 2010, 07:07 AM	#23
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	I think I would just buy a few back up bracelets so the codes match up. I'm not really sure what a back watch would do for me, I would rather be wearing a watch that I am able to associate some memories with. Scott __________________ "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922

9 October 2010, 09:44 AM	#24
sakuraba "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Jib Location: SJ, California Watch: sun dial Posts: 8,189	The 16600 is a very tough watch, I seriously doubt you'll ever be without one unless you count the 6 weeks it will spend at the RSC for servicing. If you're itching to spend some cash, a wise investment IMHO would be a matte 16660. Nearly identical to your SD, but with the potential to become collectible. Just my __________________ F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland

9 October 2010, 12:53 PM	#25
Jason71 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jason Location: USA Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers Posts: 7,973	I have triplets, but one is a bit of an odd-ball I also have 2 LV subs.... I say go for it. __________________ Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY

9 October 2010, 01:14 PM	#26
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	Your analogy of pulling a BNIB 16600 out of the safe in 25 years is pretty damn cool.... I had never thought of that before. Problem for me is I could never leave the stikers on it and not wear it even if I had 40 of them It would be BNIB for about 6 months max with me If it is just to have I would do it. If your thinking about making $$$ off it in 25 years I would say do not. Take the $6k, invest in and in 25 years you should be able to buy 3 of them __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

9 October 2010, 01:47 PM	#28
Singslinger "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: singapore Posts: 6,424	I haven't but I have two Rolex-loving friends who have. One bought two Submariners and another two LVs for roughly the same reasons as you, so rest assured - you're not alone in your craziness!

9 October 2010, 02:01 PM	#29
xjeeunitx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,527	Personally, I would get something else! Diversify your collection if you have the funds but in the end, it's really up to you brother! __________________ *2 FACTOR AUTHENTICATION ENABLED.*

9 October 2010, 02:12 PM	#30
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	I don't see why not, as long as you have the funds for it, and you seem to love it so much. I say go for it! But if it were me, I'd resort to a "brother/sister" of the watch. Like a sub or a dssd. Gives me a few options that way.. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)