ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Eric88 · 12 October 2010, 02:59 PM

Hey Folks,

This is a fairly commonplace thread and I'm a frequent contributor. The more I sit around and think about watches, the more I think that I should just go for the Sub-C, foregoing my beloved 16610LV and maybe even my GMT Master to make it happen.

I am really more of a one watch kind of guy and think I'd probably be happy with an uber Sub-C vs. a couple of near-misses that keep me thinking, "if only this was x."

What do you think?! Please talk me on or off the ledge. Photos are certainly welcomed.

Regards,
EL

1000ft · 12 October 2010, 03:08 PM

A sub ceramic no date and I'm content for life.

esm · 12 October 2010, 03:11 PM

New and old

Vs. Old and new

IMO - the 16610LV is just as a great looking piece as the Sub-C. Yes, the 116610LN has the newer case and more solid bracelet, but that is pretty much it - the ceramic insert isn't all "that" IMO.
So, it's up to you at the end of the day. The good thing is that you can fit a black bezel insert on 16610LV too.

I know I'm not really the right person to ask for a suggestion......

Good luck, can't go wrong either way IMO.

sleddog · 12 October 2010, 03:14 PM

Well the Subc is definitely a nice piece but I wouldn't lose the LV to get it...
Have you tried on and seen the Subc in person??

Eric88 · 12 October 2010, 03:17 PM

Nope, I have tried a few times and no one has had the Sub-C available. I have only seen the seductive photos online. Many of which don't look too much different from my Sub LV with black insert. But I'm still intrigued and that's why I started this thread!

stockae92 · 12 October 2010, 03:17 PM

nope, i wouldn't do it

LV is the classic Sub with Maxi dial, the perfect combo :)

sleddog · 12 October 2010, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric88

Nope, I have tried a few times and no one has had the Sub-C available. I have only seen the seductive photos online. Many of which don't look too much different from my Sub LV with black insert. But I'm still intrigued and that's why I started this thread!

Wait till you see it in the flesh before making any rash choices..
Don't get me wrong,it is a beautiful watch IMO....

It is your decision after all and I wish you the best....Just make sure it's the ONE before trading anything!

timepieceaddict · 12 October 2010, 04:30 PM

I traded my 16610 for 116610 and have not regretted for one minute. Biggest advantage of 116610 is the glide lock (oh so easy and comfortable to adjust) and the ar coating on cyclops.

steubi1 · 12 October 2010, 04:44 PM

Don't do it, you will regret it!

My new SubC is sitting in the box at home and waiting for some wrist time, but it will not happen anymore. The new case design with the wide lugs is not what I like.

I know that there is always this thrill to get rid of something old and get the new. But from my own experience I can tell you: After 2 months I was fed up with the SubC, couldn't stand out anymore....

But in the end, you have to go for what you really like. I know there are many people around that actually like the new design of the case.

And believe me, technically speaking, the new SubC is one perfect watch...

Tom

le_baroudeur · 12 October 2010, 04:59 PM

the old classic sub is perfect... The LV brings you in addition the maxi dial and the natural green acid touch... Classic case (beautiful because slim) with maxi dial: Don't sell it! (or buy the new to compare for a month before selling the "old" one)

exxondus · 12 October 2010, 05:56 PM

u need to get the new Sub C or at least, the newer G or alphanumeric older subs/sublv.

the AR on the cyclops is really da bomb imo.

Macro80 · 12 October 2010, 06:18 PM

In short...no. Several factors, including recent price increases mean this is an even worse deal for you.

viper · 12 October 2010, 06:41 PM

I wouldn't do it . The LV is a perfect watch in my opinion .

it's been my daily watch for over 6 years now .

please make sure you see both side by side before you do anything

with the new increase , it just doesn't seem like it's worth all that money IMO

jameshe · 12 October 2010, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steubi1

Don't do it, you will regret it!

My new SubC is sitting in the box at home and waiting for some wrist time, but it will not happen anymore. The new case design with the wide lugs is not what I like.

I know that there is always this thrill to get rid of something old and get the new. But from my own experience I can tell you: After 2 months I was fed up with the SubC, couldn't stand out anymore....

But in the end, you have to go for what you really like. I know there are many people around that actually like the new design of the case.

And believe me, technically speaking, the new SubC is one perfect watch...

Tom

PM me if you want to trade with my 2010 116234 I have up on the FS section

I was waiting to sell to get a sub c here in London

James

Art 1 · 12 October 2010, 08:33 PM

I would not.

nauticajoe · 12 October 2010, 09:11 PM

I wouldn't do it.

toolr · 12 October 2010, 09:26 PM

I wouldn't do it.

Puffy · 12 October 2010, 09:44 PM

Personally I wouldn't flip two watches to get one

dalip · 12 October 2010, 09:46 PM

not a chance mate....the LV is perfect..easy to change the insert....and I'm not a fan of the new cases

Frankie13 · 12 October 2010, 10:01 PM

Just wait until you see the the Sub-C in person and then do what your hard tells you!
Good luck!!

bmsermd · 12 October 2010, 10:26 PM

It would be easy for me to say, simply, don't do it.
After all, you're experiencing exactly the dilemma I went through, although I didnt have an LV at the time.
See the Sub-C in person before you even consider this move.
For me the choice became easy one I had both on my wrist.
I fall into the camp of the LV being the perfect, modern Sub.
Wouldnt trade it for anything.

Danand · 12 October 2010, 10:29 PM

I agree with those that say wait to see it on your wrist. I was considering the old vs the new, waited until my ad had both and could compare them. (actually was able to compare all four- new and old black and green). Having only seen rhpictures previously I was leaning to the old but once I saw them on my wrist it was no contest- I loved the sub c. And yes the bracelet/ clasp are a huge improvement. As a solo daily wearer you can't go wrong with the new one. Good luck with your choice.

do or die · 12 October 2010, 10:31 PM

Do it, the clasp on its own is worth the upgrade......it is a piece of art.

CoopJr · 12 October 2010, 10:31 PM

I traded in my LV for this and dont regret it for a second.

If you can swing both then I would say keep the LV and get the C because, IMO, they are different enough to justify it.

padi56 · 12 October 2010, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleddog1000

Well the Subc is definitely a nice piece but I wouldn't lose the LV to get it...
Have you tried on and seen the Subc in person??

Have to agree and basically the same except for a ceramic insert, different clasp,and slightly restyled case plus quite a price hike.

Shade · 12 October 2010, 10:47 PM

Try one on before you make the decision..

tifosi · 12 October 2010, 11:39 PM

NOPE! It doesn't get any better than a 16610LV. Maybe I'm biased.....

chris russell · 12 October 2010, 11:43 PM

Get it. I did and I've never been happier with a watch. The glidelock bracelet, the AR cyclops, the Pythagorean ratio between the case width and the lug width, the extra finishing evident on both the watch and the bracelet make it all add up to a superb choice, imho.

Those who whinge, pule and ululate about not liking the new style are nattering nabobs of negativism, as Spiro Ted Agnew used to say.

MortgageGuy · 12 October 2010, 11:52 PM

I would get the Sub C

I have had it for amost 2 months now and am in love

I have a TT Sub Ceramic for about a year prior and loved it too...

The clasp and new case design wears so very comfortable IMO. You certainly need to try it on first but I would take this over the older sub anyday.

That being said, I have an LV too and would NOT sell/trade it. I personally would save the $$$ and add a 2nd watch but you say your a "one watch kind of guy" so that being the case makes this decision a bit tougher.

Love my sub C

Here are a pic of each

MY-WATCH · 13 October 2010, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stockae92

nope, i wouldn't do it

LV is the classic Sub with Maxi dial, the perfect combo :)

x2

the sub-c will be there for a long time while the LV will not
take ur time don't rush

12 October 2010, 02:59 PM	#1
Eric88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 88 keys Posts: 2,241	Should I make the bold move from 16610LV to Sub-C? Hey Folks, This is a fairly commonplace thread and I'm a frequent contributor. The more I sit around and think about watches, the more I think that I should just go for the Sub-C, foregoing my beloved 16610LV and maybe even my GMT Master to make it happen. I am really more of a one watch kind of guy and think I'd probably be happy with an uber Sub-C vs. a couple of near-misses that keep me thinking, "if only this was x." What do you think?! Please talk me on or off the ledge. Photos are certainly welcomed. Regards, EL

12 October 2010, 03:14 PM	#4
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,931	Well the Subc is definitely a nice piece but I wouldn't lose the LV to get it... Have you tried on and seen the Subc in person?? __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

12 October 2010, 06:41 PM	#13
viper "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Northeast Posts: 943	I wouldn't do it . The LV is a perfect watch in my opinion . it's been my daily watch for over 6 years now . please make sure you see both side by side before you do anything with the new increase , it just doesn't seem like it's worth all that money IMO __________________ 16610LV 16200 116600 116500

12 October 2010, 09:44 PM	#18
Puffy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Here and there Posts: 12,485	Personally I wouldn't flip two watches to get one __________________ Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten

12 October 2010, 09:46 PM	#19
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	not a chance mate....the LV is perfect..easy to change the insert....and I'm not a fan of the new cases __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

12 October 2010, 03:08 PM	#2
1000ft Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Vancouver, B.C Watch: Submariner 14060m Posts: 45	A sub ceramic no date and I'm content for life.

12 October 2010, 03:11 PM	#3
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	New and old Vs. Old and new IMO - the 16610LV is just as a great looking piece as the Sub-C. Yes, the 116610LN has the newer case and more solid bracelet, but that is pretty much it - the ceramic insert isn't all "that" IMO. So, it's up to you at the end of the day. The good thing is that you can fit a black bezel insert on 16610LV too. I know I'm not really the right person to ask for a suggestion...... Good luck, can't go wrong either way IMO.

12 October 2010, 03:17 PM	#5
Eric88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 88 keys Posts: 2,241	Nope, I have tried a few times and no one has had the Sub-C available. I have only seen the seductive photos online. Many of which don't look too much different from my Sub LV with black insert. But I'm still intrigued and that's why I started this thread!

12 October 2010, 03:17 PM	#6
stockae92 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Socal Posts: 4,962	nope, i wouldn't do it LV is the classic Sub with Maxi dial, the perfect combo :)

12 October 2010, 04:30 PM	#8
timepieceaddict "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Nick Location: Sussex, UK Watch: 116520, Pam 312 Posts: 286	I traded my 16610 for 116610 and have not regretted for one minute. Biggest advantage of 116610 is the glide lock (oh so easy and comfortable to adjust) and the ar coating on cyclops.

12 October 2010, 04:44 PM	#9
steubi1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Tom Location: Switzerland Watch: too many Posts: 1,150	Don't do it, you will regret it! My new SubC is sitting in the box at home and waiting for some wrist time, but it will not happen anymore. The new case design with the wide lugs is not what I like. I know that there is always this thrill to get rid of something old and get the new. But from my own experience I can tell you: After 2 months I was fed up with the SubC, couldn't stand out anymore.... But in the end, you have to go for what you really like. I know there are many people around that actually like the new design of the case. And believe me, technically speaking, the new SubC is one perfect watch... Tom

12 October 2010, 04:59 PM	#10
le_baroudeur "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Rennes, FRANCE Posts: 802	the old classic sub is perfect... The LV brings you in addition the maxi dial and the natural green acid touch... Classic case (beautiful because slim) with maxi dial: Don't sell it! (or buy the new to compare for a month before selling the "old" one)

12 October 2010, 05:56 PM	#11
exxondus "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 568	u need to get the new Sub C or at least, the newer G or alphanumeric older subs/sublv. the AR on the cyclops is really da bomb imo.

12 October 2010, 06:18 PM	#12
Macro80 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: London Posts: 248	In short...no. Several factors, including recent price increases mean this is an even worse deal for you.

12 October 2010, 08:33 PM	#15
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	I would not.

12 October 2010, 09:11 PM	#16
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	I wouldn't do it.

12 October 2010, 09:26 PM	#17
toolr 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Northwest Posts: 1,369	I wouldn't do it.

12 October 2010, 10:01 PM	#20
Frankie13 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: US Watch: 116610LV Posts: 434	Just wait until you see the the Sub-C in person and then do what your hard tells you! Good luck!!

12 October 2010, 10:26 PM	#21
bmsermd "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Brant Location: YYZ Watch: 16610 LV (V......) Posts: 101	It would be easy for me to say, simply, don't do it. After all, you're experiencing exactly the dilemma I went through, although I didnt have an LV at the time. See the Sub-C in person before you even consider this move. For me the choice became easy one I had both on my wrist. I fall into the camp of the LV being the perfect, modern Sub. Wouldnt trade it for anything.

12 October 2010, 10:29 PM	#22
Danand "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Jonathan Location: Ottawa Watch: 116610LN Posts: 1,246	I agree with those that say wait to see it on your wrist. I was considering the old vs the new, waited until my ad had both and could compare them. (actually was able to compare all four- new and old black and green). Having only seen rhpictures previously I was leaning to the old but once I saw them on my wrist it was no contest- I loved the sub c. And yes the bracelet/ clasp are a huge improvement. As a solo daily wearer you can't go wrong with the new one. Good luck with your choice.

12 October 2010, 10:31 PM	#23
do or die Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: tatustu Location: Scotland Watch: SubC ExpII Posts: 95	Do it, the clasp on its own is worth the upgrade......it is a piece of art. Attached Images

12 October 2010, 10:31 PM	#24
CoopJr "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Coop Location: U.S.A. Watch: Subs Posts: 6,455	I traded in my LV for this and dont regret it for a second. If you can swing both then I would say keep the LV and get the C because, IMO, they are different enough to justify it.

12 October 2010, 10:47 PM	#26
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Try one on before you make the decision.. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

12 October 2010, 11:39 PM	#27
tifosi "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Russ Location: Southern NJ Posts: 5,760	NOPE! It doesn't get any better than a 16610LV. Maybe I'm biased..... __________________ Russ

12 October 2010, 11:43 PM	#28
chris russell Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Peterborough, ON Watch: your mouth. Posts: 1,023	Get it. I did and I've never been happier with a watch. The glidelock bracelet, the AR cyclops, the Pythagorean ratio between the case width and the lug width, the extra finishing evident on both the watch and the bracelet make it all add up to a superb choice, imho. Those who whinge, pule and ululate about not liking the new style are nattering nabobs of negativism, as Spiro Ted Agnew used to say.

12 October 2010, 11:52 PM	#29
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	I would get the Sub C I have had it for amost 2 months now and am in love I have a TT Sub Ceramic for about a year prior and loved it too... The clasp and new case design wears so very comfortable IMO. You certainly need to try it on first but I would take this over the older sub anyday. That being said, I have an LV too and would NOT sell/trade it. I personally would save the $$$ and add a 2nd watch but you say your a "one watch kind of guy" so that being the case makes this decision a bit tougher. Love my sub C Here are a pic of each __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)