The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 November 2010, 11:47 AM   #1
Robert7749
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1
GMT Master II 2 tone longevity

Hello all. I'm very new to this forum. Thought i would ask the experts. I'm looking to purchase my first Rolex. I am pretty settled in the Master II and I'm stuck between the all stainless and the 2 tone. For the price this will likely be my last watch. That said I'm wondering if anyone can offer info on the projected lifespan of the bracelet on the 2 tone vs the all stainless model. Just thinking the gold links while solid must be softer than the all stainless. Any info / advise would be great. Thanks.
Robert7749 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2010, 11:51 AM   #2
qulhey22
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Toby
Location: Thibodaux LA
Watch: GMT II c 11/2010
Posts: 35
Just bought my first GMT II c steel and the AD did say the TT would scratch easier on the gold since it is softer. Both will end up scratching though.

Had a hard time deciding this past Friday. The TT definately seem to catch more attention from my wife and the AD but my style is more steel.

Only had the GMT for 2 days and loving it. Good luck on your decision.
qulhey22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2010, 12:59 PM   #3
jmsrolls
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
I went for the TT GMT IIC but soon regretted my decision. The gold looks good but is easily dinged and scratched. I went back to my EXP II which is much more durable.

Plus I do not care for the Rolex ceramic bezels.

Fr. John†
jmsrolls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2010, 05:44 AM   #4
jeremyam
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Watch: 16610 V
Posts: 511
both are equally durable. the only difference being that gold attracts attention and scratches
jeremyam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2010, 06:27 AM   #5
flathead59
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 349
Are you talking about the 16710/16713, or the current version, the GMT Master IIc? I don't own a TT watch, but I would assume that with the hollow links in the older style bracelets the softer gold could very well wear more quickly. Wouldn't be a deal breaker for me, just a matter of more frequent cleaning. On the other hand, I wouldn't think that a two tone GMT Master IIc bracelet would wear that much more quickly, because of the link design.

Mark
flathead59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2010, 06:43 AM   #6
petesjag
"TRF" Member
 
petesjag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: netherlands
Posts: 2,177
You just have to be a bit more carefull with the gold links in terms of scratches, I have not owned my TT long enough to give you advice about the durability of the bracelet in terms of stretch etc....it is a wonderfully balanced watch though..
__________________
116718LN Black dial
petesjag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2010, 07:19 AM   #7
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
You don't need to worry about the lifespan of your TT watch as long as you keep it clean. If too much grit builds up inside where the connecting screws are it will grind and erode the gold faster than the SS.

The new ones with their solid links are more durable than the earlier versions,

This one is a decade old and shows little wear..........

__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2010, 07:25 AM   #8
Chris B
"TRF" Member
 
Chris B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post

This one is a decade old and shows little wear..........


Great pic Larry
Chris B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2010, 07:28 AM   #9
qulhey22
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Toby
Location: Thibodaux LA
Watch: GMT II c 11/2010
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
You don't need to worry about the lifespan of your TT watch as long as you keep it clean. If too much grit builds up inside where the connecting screws are it will grind and erode the gold faster than the SS.

The new ones with their solid links are more durable than the earlier versions,

This one is a decade old and shows little wear..........

Nice pic as well Larry. Looks like you had the polished links brushed? Sure that helps with hiding scratches and still looks attractive! Good job.
qulhey22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2010, 07:40 AM   #10
RRGHOST1
"TRF" Member
 
RRGHOST1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
Dont let this modern trend of SS put you off buying a TT model. I love the TT in any model Rolex. The TT GMT looks very classy, it would be my choice.
RRGHOST1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2010, 09:28 AM   #11
D. Whitman
"TRF" Member
 
D. Whitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabe
Location: Arizona
Watch: 116500
Posts: 116
I have a TT GMTIIC, but only for about four months. Long term wear is not really concern for me as it's a solid piece and I expect this watch to be with me for the rest of my life. The tip about keeping it clean is good advice. I can tell you that it's very elegant and it is my favorite watch. For me any gold watch, TT or otherwise, can be balanced out with a solid SS model which is why I own a DSSD for the rough and tumble. A TT watch, IMO, is a must if absolutely love the way it looks - and the GMT is fantastic in TT.
D. Whitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2010, 10:55 AM   #12
Watchdog
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
As other, more knowledgeable members have stated, no worries.

Personally, I love the TT. It's a perfect balance to me!

Watchdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2010, 12:53 PM   #13
Perdu
"TRF" Member
 
Perdu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
I had a TT Sub for 15 years and saw no wear to the bracelet.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500

Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter
Perdu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2010, 12:57 PM   #14
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by qulhey22 View Post
Nice pic as well Larry. Looks like you had the polished links brushed? Sure that helps with hiding scratches and still looks attractive! Good job.
No, I did not have the gold links brushed... I simply do not polish them to a high luster.. I don't like that look, and the patina on the gold doesn't show the scratches and finger prints the way a high polish does...........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 12:32 PM   #15
itchy243mhz
"TRF" Member
 
itchy243mhz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Southern Maryland
Watch: 14060M, 116613LB
Posts: 389
That is what I want my 1 year old TT GMT to look like in a few years, the patina is an awesome, salty look.
Larry, did the service center polish the links at the last servicing or did you opt out of that?
itchy243mhz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 12:59 PM   #16
scarlet knight
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,468
I have a ceramic black bezel GMTIIc in steel...

And I really enjoy it. I thought the TT was too blingy for me and I didn't want to spend that much money. But looking at the pictures and having seen it in the stores, it is a sharp looking watch!

I don't get too excited about the scratches, etc. It can develop into a patina and look vintage or I am confident a service center can restore most damage.

Get what you like and have fun!
scarlet knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 04:47 PM   #17
George Ab
"TRF" Member
 
George Ab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
They both will last forever, if you keep it clean like Larry said.

To clean just throw the bracelet in an ultrasonic cleaner every four months or so and let it cycle for 4 or 5 cycles with some common dish soap. Only way to get the grit that gets onto the pins via your sweat and the like. A $40 ultrasonic cleaner will do the job fine.
__________________

George Ab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 06:30 PM   #18
swatty
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
swatty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
Just get the one that looks best on your wrist. Wear and tear will be similar whichever one you choose

PS: welcome to TRF
swatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.