ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rollieboy · 20 December 2010, 05:41 AM

Hi,

Just noticed something I hadn't thought of / noticed before. The rehaut is not as thick on the SD as it is on the Sub Date.

I wonder if the thinner rehaut ring is the reason they haven't put the rehaut engraving to the SD, even on the M-serial? Maybe the engraving would be too small? Gotta say, I prefer to have one without any text. I always thought the engraved text makes the watch look a little too "busy", although it's by no means ugly or a show stopper for me in anyway.

20 December 2010, 05:41 AM	#1
Rollieboy Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Tero Location: Finland Watch: 16600 Posts: 89	Sea Dweller rehaut thickness Hi, Just noticed something I hadn't thought of / noticed before. The rehaut is not as thick on the SD as it is on the Sub Date. I wonder if the thinner rehaut ring is the reason they haven't put the rehaut engraving to the SD, even on the M-serial? Maybe the engraving would be too small? Gotta say, I prefer to have one without any text. I always thought the engraved text makes the watch look a little too "busy", although it's by no means ugly or a show stopper for me in anyway.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)