ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

rolexsweep · 15 January 2011, 02:17 PM

im looking to purchase my first watch and im 20. im in between a DJ SS and an explorer 1, im looking to wear it with pretty much everything... i just want to know what you all think of each watch and what you recommend especially as it is going to be my first watch. thank you.

wisguy · 15 January 2011, 02:22 PM

I would go for the 39mm Explorer.

It's a bit more modern size-wise and the brushed bracelet makes it better to wear with everything, it's less formal and you can beat it all day without it showing it.

It's brand new so it won't change for a while, not that Rolex changes watches very often though...

Try them both on and see for yourself.

GradyPhilpott · 15 January 2011, 02:37 PM

I have both the 114270 and the 116200 and I like them both very much. It's a very hard choice, as they both have a lot going for them.

They are very similar, yet very different and equally rugged.

It's entirely a matter of choice. The Explorer is more sporty, while the DJ is more dressy, but either would work for dressy occasions.

I just saw the 214270 for the first time the other day. Personally, I prefer the 114270, but I can see the appeal of the 214270.

It's larger size brings the Explorer more into line with the other watches in the professional series. Just looking at the watch in the case with the Explorer II, the Subs, and the GMTs, you can see plainly that the 214270 is in its element.

On the wrist, it has a definite presence that the 114270 or the 116200 cannot match. The watch dominated my 7.67" wrist. It will certainly appeal to the younger crowd who has practically grown up with the larger watches, yet it does not have the proportion of watches that will look grotesque in a few years as fashion changes.

Which ever you choose, you won't go wrong, but I can almost assure you that which ever you choose, you will not be satisfied and will as soon as you are able, buy yourself another Rolex and then another and on and on.

You're starting young, so there's a lot to look forward to.

Dan Pierce · 15 January 2011, 02:39 PM

If you want a date feature and many dial options go with the DJ. If not, the EXP is a classic.
dP

rolexsweep · 15 January 2011, 02:40 PM

you just confused the F out of me with all those codes for watches.... seriously.

egzbuen · 15 January 2011, 02:42 PM

Between the two, I would take the DJ SS on fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet with big roman dial.

If I may ad an option, the 16610 would be a great first Rolex.

However, at the end of the day, you cant go wrong with either, including the 16610.

unclesallie · 15 January 2011, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolexsweep

you just confused the F out of me with all those codes for watches.... seriously.

Here you go:

http://www.melrosejewelers.com/model...ence-chart.htm

Take a look at these. There are three numbers of importance to you: 1. model number or case number 2. serial number 3. caliber number.

The model or case number tells you just that, and an indication of age.
Serial number, enables you to check if the watch has been stolen, and age.

Caliber no. tells you the type of movement in the watch.

There is a 4th number, COST. A very important number indeed. Let's make it simple: for a first Rolex: stainless steel(ss) submariner date.....5 or 6 years old can be bought from a trusted seller here on TRF, thousands of dollars less than a new one. For trusted sellers there's a section on this Forum. Of course, you must always get references. Good luck!

blackmsport · 15 January 2011, 10:07 PM

Exp I for me

mtrunner · 15 January 2011, 10:21 PM

My vote would be the Explorer. I think it is great for every setting and a little bigger than the DJ.

Maxtor · 15 January 2011, 11:40 PM

The Explorer is a classic. If you can, try both sizes to see what is a better fit for you.

The DJ has the advantage of the date. Also many dial and bracelet and bezel choices. What appeals to you at 20 may change over time in terms of the combo so think long term and I recommend going simple and classic (I like a stick dial).

Take your time and enjoy the process. I also recommend the TRF Trusted Sellers.

Dr. Robert · 16 January 2011, 03:44 AM

datejust.

sea-dweller · 16 January 2011, 10:06 AM

Explorer 1, for me.

GradyPhilpott · 16 January 2011, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolexsweep

you just confused the F out of me with all those codes for watches.... seriously.

Google is your friend.

The reference numbers aren't necessary in most discussions, but they do make it easy when discussing some models as a shorthand for the full names.

114270 the last of the 36mm Explorers
214270 the new 39mm Explorer
116200 the newer, larger, polished case DateJust in SS with the domed bezel.

Rags · 16 January 2011, 10:30 AM

TT datejust with jubilee bracelet & stick dial ( I prefer the champagne dial myself),many dials to choose from & it looks great with a suit or casual with a Tshirt & jeans.

StarSovereign · 16 January 2011, 01:39 PM

The DateJust is the classic Rolex. It also has the date function that I find to be a must in a watch. The new 39mm Explorer in nice, but if you have to have the date it's a dealbreaker. I'd go for the DateJust. I did and I have no regrets whatsoever!

dysondiver · 9 July 2016, 07:24 AM

interesting ,,, same choice , after google the views up pops this old thread again , both holding the same price now , i guess the only difference is the date function , and the bracelet ,, ah lifes choices ,
but great to see when you start to research trf is right at the top of the results.

15 January 2011, 02:17 PM	#1
rolexsweep "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Australia Watch: RG DD40 Posts: 1,149	HELP First Watch, Date Just 36mm SS or Explorer 1 im looking to purchase my first watch and im 20. im in between a DJ SS and an explorer 1, im looking to wear it with pretty much everything... i just want to know what you all think of each watch and what you recommend especially as it is going to be my first watch. thank you.

15 January 2011, 02:22 PM	#2
wisguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Earth Posts: 2,406	I would go for the 39mm Explorer. It's a bit more modern size-wise and the brushed bracelet makes it better to wear with everything, it's less formal and you can beat it all day without it showing it. It's brand new so it won't change for a while, not that Rolex changes watches very often though... Try them both on and see for yourself. __________________ 5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation

15 January 2011, 02:37 PM	#3
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK047 Posts: 34,460	I have both the 114270 and the 116200 and I like them both very much. It's a very hard choice, as they both have a lot going for them. They are very similar, yet very different and equally rugged. It's entirely a matter of choice. The Explorer is more sporty, while the DJ is more dressy, but either would work for dressy occasions. I just saw the 214270 for the first time the other day. Personally, I prefer the 114270, but I can see the appeal of the 214270. It's larger size brings the Explorer more into line with the other watches in the professional series. Just looking at the watch in the case with the Explorer II, the Subs, and the GMTs, you can see plainly that the 214270 is in its element. On the wrist, it has a definite presence that the 114270 or the 116200 cannot match. The watch dominated my 7.67" wrist. It will certainly appeal to the younger crowd who has practically grown up with the larger watches, yet it does not have the proportion of watches that will look grotesque in a few years as fashion changes. Which ever you choose, you won't go wrong, but I can almost assure you that which ever you choose, you will not be satisfied and will as soon as you are able, buy yourself another Rolex and then another and on and on. You're starting young, so there's a lot to look forward to. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

15 January 2011, 02:39 PM	#4
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,217	If you want a date feature and many dial options go with the DJ. If not, the EXP is a classic. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

15 January 2011, 02:42 PM	#6
egzbuen "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Manila Posts: 1,177	Between the two, I would take the DJ SS on fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet with big roman dial. If I may ad an option, the 16610 would be a great first Rolex. However, at the end of the day, you cant go wrong with either, including the 16610. __________________ 18083 & 16750 16234 & 16233 16610 & 16800 3717-01 & 104 & 312 Nav B-Uhr

15 January 2011, 02:40 PM	#5
rolexsweep "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Australia Watch: RG DD40 Posts: 1,149	you just confused the F out of me with all those codes for watches.... seriously.

15 January 2011, 10:07 PM	#8
blackmsport Banned Join Date: May 2009 Location: Melb - Australia Posts: 2,959	Exp I for me

15 January 2011, 10:21 PM	#9
mtrunner 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Gary Location: Bozeman, MT Watch: 126508 Paul Newman Posts: 7,835	My vote would be the Explorer. I think it is great for every setting and a little bigger than the DJ.

15 January 2011, 11:40 PM	#10
Maxtor 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Max Location: Toronto Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo Posts: 2,472	The Explorer is a classic. If you can, try both sizes to see what is a better fit for you. The DJ has the advantage of the date. Also many dial and bracelet and bezel choices. What appeals to you at 20 may change over time in terms of the combo so think long term and I recommend going simple and classic (I like a stick dial). Take your time and enjoy the process. I also recommend the TRF Trusted Sellers.

16 January 2011, 03:44 AM	#11
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,297	datejust. __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

16 January 2011, 10:06 AM	#12
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Explorer 1, for me. __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

16 January 2011, 10:30 AM	#14
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,196	TT datejust with jubilee bracelet & stick dial ( I prefer the champagne dial myself),many dials to choose from & it looks great with a suit or casual with a Tshirt & jeans. __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

16 January 2011, 01:39 PM	#15
StarSovereign "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Erik Location: Bay Area, CA Watch: 116234, 116710LN Posts: 936	The DateJust is the classic Rolex. It also has the date function that I find to be a must in a watch. The new 39mm Explorer in nice, but if you have to have the date it's a dealbreaker. I'd go for the DateJust. I did and I have no regrets whatsoever! __________________ Submariner 116610LN - Black Dial & Stainless Steel DateJust 116234 - White Stick Dial & Roulette Wheel GMT-Master II 116710LN - Black Dial & Green "Fouth Hand"

9 July 2016, 07:24 AM	#16
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	interesting ,,, same choice , after google the views up pops this old thread again , both holding the same price now , i guess the only difference is the date function , and the bracelet ,, ah lifes choices , but great to see when you start to research trf is right at the top of the results.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)