The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 January 2011, 04:52 AM   #1
byr0nic
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London, New York
Watch: ing art & watches
Posts: 117
Icon5 AP ROO Titanium Themes (grey dial) - opinions?

Hi all,

I was in Hong Kong last week and went to an AP AD whilst in town to compare prices with London. When in the boutique, I noticed the Titanium Themes (26170TI.OO.1000TI.01) and immediately asked if I could try the watch on.

I've read elsewhere that no one does a grey dial like AP, and based on my experience with this watch in person I wouldn't be bold enough to disagree. As expected for the case/bracelet material, it was phenomenally light for its imposing size - I'm still undecided as to whether this lightness is a good thing though! (I like the idea of feeling like you are wearing a watch!)

I didn't purchase the watch whilst in HK, however am seriously considering sourcing a top notch pre-owned model from somewhere in the globe... maybe even using my newly-purchased DSSD to part fund (buying two watches of that calibre in the space of a few months is probably not the wisest of choices, I figure)...

What do any/all you ROO lovers think of the grey dial and Titanium case/bracelet?

I look forward to hearing your thoughts!


Cheers,
Omar
byr0nic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2011, 04:56 AM   #2
Accoutre-Montres
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 20
One of the nicest AP ROO's I have ever seen!!
Accoutre-Montres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2011, 05:01 AM   #3
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Love the grey dial,but not that keen on light weight titanium watches
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg images.jpeg (9.7 KB, 530 views)
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2011, 04:07 PM   #4
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Don't go with Titanium!

I love the gray dial. However, I would never go with a Titanium model. I love the weight and feel of my SS one. It's weighs half a pound, so imagine the amazing sensation on your wrist. Here's a pic of mine.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1108 copy 2.JPG (241.6 KB, 515 views)
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2011, 04:52 PM   #5
byr0nic
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London, New York
Watch: ing art & watches
Posts: 117
Thanks for the responses, chaps. I'm completely with you on the preference for stainless steel over titanium from the perspective of feel on the wrist, however I still can't get over the beauty of the grey dial! Quite the conundrum...

One point of personal justification is that if purchased, I'll be almost certainly using it with various other 'AP Bands' straps for different occasions (rubber for more casual, etc.) on top of the OEM bracelet; I wonder whether the lightness factor will be as significant as otherwise in this context, as I imagine most of the weight saving is actually realised by the bracelet?

I make this latter point with experience of my Hamilton Khaki Codebreaker Chrono PVD (before you laugh, I got a good deal on it soon after release, and I must say it can be fun to wear a clock on your wrist sometimes... ), which has a titanium case also (albeit 50mm) and a rubber strap, and yet still comes in at a decent weight on the wrist...


As a point of comparison between titanium and s/steel, I understand the former is technically harder, however is one in your combined experience (science aside!) better at withstanding nicks and dings at all?
byr0nic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2011, 04:56 PM   #6
byr0nic
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London, New York
Watch: ing art & watches
Posts: 117
Btw Mr. H - lovely watch...

I've got to say, in some ways the older face sans-Arabics actually looks a little classier; hadn't really thought about it until seeing your pic!
byr0nic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2011, 12:30 AM   #7
WatchTimes
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
WatchTimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
LOVE the grey dial
Love Ti
I would not buy a Ti ROO as my only ROO.
If I had a SS one already I would not hesitate to get Ti as a second.

My favorite combo is the RG ROO with the Gray dial... That one is STUNNING!

Honestly though the more of I have learned the less likely I am to buy a ROO.
I think the piggyback chrono is a BIG let down on a watch in that price range.

Also as I have small wrists I find them VERY uncomfortable! The case back and clasp are horrid for people with smaller wrists.

Yet somehow it still is an amazing piece part of me wants but won't get as I know Id flip it at a loss in no time.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman

Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun
WatchTimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2011, 02:59 PM   #8
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by JYogi View Post
LOVE the grey dial
Love Ti
I would not buy a Ti ROO as my only ROO.
If I had a SS one already I would not hesitate to get Ti as a second.

My favorite combo is the RG ROO with the Gray dial... That one is STUNNING!

Honestly though the more of I have learned the less likely I am to buy a ROO.
I think the piggyback chrono is a BIG let down on a watch in that price range.

Also as I have small wrists I find them VERY uncomfortable! The case back and clasp are horrid for people with smaller wrists.

Yet somehow it still is an amazing piece part of me wants but won't get as I know Id flip it at a loss in no time.
Jeremy, wait till you own one and feel it on your wrist for a whole day. You will never flip it. I promise.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2011, 03:01 PM   #9
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by byr0nic View Post
Btw Mr. H - lovely watch...

I've got to say, in some ways the older face sans-Arabics actually looks a little classier; hadn't really thought about it until seeing your pic!
Thanks Omar. I personally love this first dial that came out in 1993 with the launch of the watch. Mine is a D with a very low serial No. below the 200s.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2011, 12:44 AM   #10
WatchTimes
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
WatchTimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submarino View Post
Jeremy, wait till you own one and feel it on your wrist for a whole day. You will never flip it. I promise.

Sub, my friend and I did a trade a couple times.
I have had his RG RubberClad, Ti ROO on leather and his Themes on a bracelet... I have worn them for extended periods

I was VERY let down.
I think the piggy back chrono is a joke for an in house movement in this price range so not matter the size of the case I would be let down.
The case is overly thick as a result
The crown and chrono pushers do not line up because of this
The wear on a piggy back is worse than an integrated chrono so more maint issues.
Also as I said the case is not comfortable on smaller wrists at all from the caseback to the clasp it just wasn't a good fit.
I like the style and design but it ends there for me with the ROO.
Trust me I tried to fall in love as it is a "ROO", I have had my AD hold them with deposit for me, he has ordered LE's for me and when it comes down every time I go in and put it on my wrist I ask him and myself WHY did I bother again?? He laughs as he has LISTS of clients who are ALWAYS willing to buy one when they are able to get it in stock.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman

Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun
WatchTimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2011, 07:30 AM   #11
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Fair enough. I didn't know you have owned several ROOs. My bad!
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2011, 10:05 AM   #12
boa2
2024 Pledge Member
 
boa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Accoutre-Montres View Post
One of the nicest AP ROO's I have ever seen!!
Ditto. I love the Ti version...and the weight. It's still over 150 grams, and with the size of the watch, I think the Ti makes it a great daily wearer. Looks great on the Survivor and Diver straps as well.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other."
boa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2011, 10:25 AM   #13
WatchTimes
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
WatchTimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submarino View Post
Fair enough. I didn't know you have owned several ROOs. My bad!
Still a bad arse watch that is for sure. It just isnt for me.

I think if I had bigger wrists I would have kept one of them.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman

Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun
WatchTimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2011, 05:06 PM   #14
byr0nic
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London, New York
Watch: ing art & watches
Posts: 117
Thanks all!

Thanks all for the feedback and subsequent healthy debate! Much food for thought...

Personally, I knew the chrono was a 'piggyback', however didn't realise the drawbacks because of this as mentioned by Jeremy. I'm still not sure whether it's a massive issue for me, as my default requirement is only that it is an in-house movement, however perhaps I should be fussier!

The ruminations go on...



byr0nic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2011, 11:41 PM   #15
xbox
"TRF" Member
 
xbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beach in the Med
Watch: Hunting ...
Posts: 1,148
I like both the SS and Ti bracelet models, it would be a very tough choice for me.

Not much more of an opinion from me!
xbox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2011, 02:13 AM   #16
boa2
2024 Pledge Member
 
boa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by byr0nic View Post
Thanks all for the feedback and subsequent healthy debate! Much food for thought...

Personally, I knew the chrono was a 'piggyback', however didn't realise the drawbacks because of this as mentioned by Jeremy. I'm still not sure whether it's a massive issue for me, as my default requirement is only that it is an in-house movement, however perhaps I should be fussier!

The ruminations go on...



"Piggyback" chronographs are used even in some VERY high end watches (Hublot, Richard Mille, etc). The net effect in terms of usage or cost due to having a Dubois-Depraz chronograph module attached to (in this case) an in-house movement will be a non-issue.

Literally thousands of people own the Offshore, as they are nearing 20 years in production. If you like the watch, you'll be yet another happy owner.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other."
boa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2011, 02:22 AM   #17
WatchTimes
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
WatchTimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by boa2 View Post
"Piggyback" chronographs are common, even in some VERY high end watches. The actual effect in terms of usage or cost due to having a Dubois-Depraz chronograph module attached to an in-house movement will be a non-issue.

Literally thousands of people own the Offshore, as they are nearing 20 years in production. If you like the watch, you'll be yet another happy owner.
Id listen to Howard about this
His knowledge of the mechanics and watches FAR surpasses mine!

Again, as I said even though its a shortcoming in my book if I had bigger wrists I would still likely own one! Most every watch has a shortcoming if we look hard enough.

I must admit I do like the diver and when I tried it on I found it pretty darn comfortable!
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman

Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun
WatchTimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2011, 03:53 AM   #18
boa2
2024 Pledge Member
 
boa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by JYogi View Post
Id listen to Howard about this
His knowledge of the mechanics and watches FAR surpasses mine!

Again, as I said even though its a shortcoming in my book if I had bigger wrists I would still likely own one! Most every watch has a shortcoming if we look hard enough.

I must admit I do like the diver and when I tried it on I found it pretty darn comfortable!
Thank you for the compliment, Jeremy...extremely kind of you.

The Diver is just a hair thinner, with a different caseback, and the wide composite strap that amazingly, quite a few folks with even tiny wrists find it comfortable. I also like it a lot.

"Most every watch has a shortcoming if we look hard enough"....oh so true.

Congratulations again on your new one.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other."
boa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2011, 03:56 AM   #19
xbox
"TRF" Member
 
xbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beach in the Med
Watch: Hunting ...
Posts: 1,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by JYogi View Post
I must admit I do like the diver and when I tried it on I found it pretty darn comfortable!
I think the Diver is a good choice, particularly considering how hot the new ROO chrono's are

I'll take your word on how comfortable the Diver is .... until DHL arrive!
xbox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2011, 05:42 AM   #20
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
The diver is beautiful! I've been thinking about getting one. It's a very comfy watch and superb looking. I might like it better than the RubberClad.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2011, 09:52 AM   #21
chazha
"TRF" Member
 
chazha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: ChairmanMao
Location: NY, US
Watch: mickey watch
Posts: 837
have you considered the new ROOs?

Steel vers goes for 28k USD. it is a must have watch for me in me life!!




__________________
I am always single, even when I am married.
chazha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2011, 10:06 AM   #22
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by chazha View Post
have you considered the new roos?

Steel vers goes for 28k usd. It is a must have watch for me in me life!!




wow!!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg drooling-homer-simpson.jpg (30.6 KB, 421 views)
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2011, 10:10 AM   #23
chazha
"TRF" Member
 
chazha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: ChairmanMao
Location: NY, US
Watch: mickey watch
Posts: 837
TSW:

I see you have the Panda in ur collection which i think its the most beautiful ROO non ltd ed. So close I was to pull the trigger then SIHH2011 came out.... :)
__________________
I am always single, even when I am married.
chazha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2011, 10:22 AM   #24
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by chazha View Post
TSW:

I see you have the Panda in ur collection which i think its the most beautiful ROO non ltd ed. So close I was to pull the trigger then SIHH2011 came out.... :)
Thanks, I was never in to AP's until i tried the Panda on and now i absolutely love them

Had a tough time deciding if i should go for the one with strap or the one with bracelet, i ended up with getting the one on bracelet and i will be ordering a strap for it as well for a dressier look.

Would love to add the Diver or a Mountauk Highway but got to scratch my itch for a Panerai 231 first
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_1368.jpg (77.5 KB, 426 views)
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 February 2011, 09:31 AM   #25
byr0nic
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London, New York
Watch: ing art & watches
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by chazha View Post
have you considered the new ROOs?

Steel vers goes for 28k USD. it is a must have watch for me in me life!!




I've got to say, the new SIHH 2011 models don't really do it for me.

The Panda on the other hand is quite the beauty... it's certainly a tough call between it and the grey dial...
byr0nic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 February 2011, 09:42 AM   #26
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by byr0nic View Post
I've got to say, the new SIHH 2011 models don't really do it for me.

The Panda on the other hand is quite the beauty... it's certainly a tough call between it and the grey dial...
Let me push you over the edge
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 000723-007.772.jpg (92.5 KB, 377 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_1368.jpg (77.5 KB, 374 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_1392.jpg (57.3 KB, 374 views)
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 February 2011, 11:05 AM   #27
chazha
"TRF" Member
 
chazha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: ChairmanMao
Location: NY, US
Watch: mickey watch
Posts: 837
Its not an easy call between grey titan and the Panda.

You see im a guy with below 7" wrist and Grey titan would look smaller on me as it has darker colours and dial. Panda would just look like a Big Panda on my wrist. As for the weight of the wacth. I wouldnt mind the titans lightness. A watch shouldnt feel heavy due to its price tag.

If i had to choose myfinal decision would be Panda with bracelet. I would then sell the bracelet then replace it with rubber strap and claps:) im not a leather dude. Ive heard that the hornback strap is tearing down pretty fast.
Once i got the panda ill start dreaming about the titan in rubber strap. Hmmm its getting expensive.

Just my 2 cents
__________________
I am always single, even when I am married.
chazha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 February 2011, 05:58 PM   #28
byr0nic
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London, New York
Watch: ing art & watches
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSW View Post
Let me push you over the edge
You've made a very compelling argument!

I think I'm going to have to play with the Panda in the flesh (haven't done so as yet) and thereafter hopefully my mind will be made up!

Will let you chaps know how the story ends...
byr0nic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 February 2011, 01:28 PM   #29
tech_controller
"TRF" Member
 
tech_controller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Middle Earth
Watch: Me Bleed...
Posts: 687
I love the AP ROOs...but the grey dial just seems too difficult to read.

AP knocked it out of the park with their latest ROOs...I am smitten and will definitely get one.
tech_controller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 11:40 AM   #30
paolo14
"TRF" Member
 
paolo14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los angeles
Posts: 372
Here's a pic of my AP ROO Ti

Here's a pic of my AP ROO Ti
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ROO.jpg (74.1 KB, 360 views)
paolo14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.