ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Capstone · 24 February 2011, 10:04 AM

I am a newbie so take my comments accordingly.

For the last month I have been debating the 36 mm vs 39 mm Explorer. Both watches are stunning. The 36 mm was probably more comfortable on my wrist; however, after trying it on several times at my AD it just did not have the same weighted feel as my late model DJ. The AD told me about the internal changes on the newer model; however, that is not what swayed me to the 39 mm. For me it really came down to the way the watch felt on my arm. The newer style bracelet just felt right to me. I must admit that the 39 mm dial is a little large for the minute hand, but it just does not bother me

.

One other note, I was surprised how different it felt to wind the Explorer compared to my DJ. I am not sure how to describe it, but the Explorer has a more substantial feel as you wind. Anyway, here are some pics...

Dan2010 · 24 February 2011, 10:08 AM

I like it. Picking up it's older brother.

Art 1 · 24 February 2011, 11:02 AM

I have handled the 39mm and really like it. It's a Rolex in it's purist form.

karmatp · 24 February 2011, 11:10 AM

The new Explorer is something special. The clasp is leaps and bounds better over the previous clasps, huge congrats on a great purchase.

Atomant · 24 February 2011, 11:15 AM

I totally like the 39mm Exp too. Mght be my next Rolex beside the GMT IIC.

Route 66 · 24 February 2011, 11:51 AM

I have the 36mm model. I checked out the 39mm version and really liked it...to be honest, more than I wanted to. The only thing I didn't like about the 39mm model is that the black face doesn't seem to be as black as it is on my 36mm Explorer, but that wouldn't prevent me from owning the new one.

As for some TRF members thinking that the hands are too small, I thought so too until I held one in my hand and compared it to my smaller Explorer I. I think the hands look fine just the way they are.

GradyPhilpott · 24 February 2011, 12:21 PM

Excellent shots, Capstone!

I have the 114270 and I like enough that I can't justify having the 214270, but when one looks at the watch as a whole and not at a macro shot of the dial, the watch is winner.

Ever since I first laid eyes on it at the AD, my prediction has been that this new Explorer will be more popular than any Explorer has ever been with the general public.

WISes may look down on it for now, but I think that the new size fills a niche in the Rolex line-up and that new buyers who would have never looked twice at the 114270 will give the 214270 its fair share of attention and sales.

MikeJaye · 24 February 2011, 02:59 PM

Great choice! The 39mm model is getting more popular by the day! I got one a few days ago and love it!

Capstone · 24 February 2011, 03:43 PM

Thanks for the reply's everyone.

Grady, you make some very good points.

MikeJaye, nice watch and good pic.

dligg72 · 24 February 2011, 03:45 PM

I want one!

Bmonroy17 · 24 February 2011, 03:49 PM

You know what kills me or at least my own personal struggle. I am looking to purchase my 4th rolie and the TRF power sellers sell the Exp. I 214270 and Milgauss for nearly the same price. Most of the time the Milgauss is cheaper. I am drawn to the 214270 but I know i am getting more watch buying the Milgauss.

Right now the plan is to get a 114270 and the Milgauss

synth19 · 24 February 2011, 04:07 PM

Congrats! I agree this watch is comfortable as they get.

Lol-x · 24 February 2011, 04:09 PM

Great pics can make a big difference to the way it looks and the impression it creates.

2jabs · 24 February 2011, 05:59 PM

Congrats! I love my 214270! Enjoy!

acce1999 · 24 February 2011, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Capstone

Congrats to a fine watch! You've captured the reflections of light very well in the above picture. This is what I like about the 214270, 114270 and 14270 compared to the older 1016 with painted numerals.

Being an Explorer wearer for many years I can understand your reasoning; 36 vs 39. I own the older 14270, that I have enjoyed since the mid 90s, and I still find the 214270 to be too big for me. Given the large dial it looks bigger than the ExII (that is also 39mm). But the shape of case of the 214270, and the bracelet is just fantastic, so it offers great comfort, a very nice massive feeling compared to the 14270 that I wear.

Since I am fortunate to own the Explorer IIs too, I am currently waiting to see what happens in Basel, if there will be a new ExII too. After that I'd decide if I will get the 214270 and/or a new ExII.

If anything, I am en Explorer fan.

Once again: Congrats!

Best,

A

Singslinger · 24 February 2011, 07:10 PM

Nice photos - congrats!

Boadicea · 24 February 2011, 08:41 PM

Very nice! Congratulations! As much as I don't like the hands, I have to admit that the new model is a big improvement on the old one.

Otto · 24 February 2011, 09:59 PM

Congratulations! To me, the new Explorer is the perfect blend of the new and the classic.

phelix_da_kat · 24 February 2011, 10:57 PM

I love the feel and look of the 39mm.. and especially the dial and the better clasp.
Actually don't mind the hands.

But I still prefer the small 36mm diameter as it's a better fit for me.

TheDude · 24 February 2011, 11:15 PM

Your pics are some of the best I have seen so far. I have tried on the 39mm a few times and i like it.

vukotab · 24 February 2011, 11:18 PM

Shorter hands or not, that watch is real beauty!
Congratulations on improved classic!

2jabs · 24 February 2011, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDude

Your pics are some of the best I have seen so far.

x2

SteKos · 25 February 2011, 02:01 AM

I tried one on recently, and I love the balance of the new 39mm. With the new bracelet and clasp, it feels like a tool watch that can/should be taken up to the the 7 peaks.

Unfortunately, after I have to agree with the "short handers", I really do think they should have re-sized the hands properly for the new dial.

smurfolino · 25 February 2011, 06:43 AM

The balance is perfect. I have mine for 5 months now, I tried several expensive watches since and putting my Explorer I back on the wrist was such a perfect feeling, just like the first time:-)
Tried leather and NATO, but...nooo, SS is just what this piece needs to be complete.

And the clasp is something else comparing to old clasps, they are so tiny and light. Guy at the Rolex store was very surprised about the clasp when he took my watch in his hands. They still did not get any Explorers 39mm yet

Explorer 2011 · 25 February 2011, 06:46 AM

Great watch! Excellent choice

Rob_b · 25 February 2011, 07:05 AM

I keep coming back to check the pic's

I'm going to check one out at my AD, I think I likey, likey a lot

Explorer 2011 · 25 February 2011, 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2jabs

x2

x3 they are the best exp pics i've seen and capture what the watch is really like close up. Considering your a 'newby' they are awesome pics.

RRGHOST1 · 25 February 2011, 07:51 AM

Its the plainess of the new Explorer that makes it very appealing. The fact the hands are odd would not be a deal breaker for me,as i think it's a cracking watch.

Singslinger · 25 February 2011, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob_b

I keep coming back to check the pic's

I'm going to check one out at my AD, I think I likey, likey a lot

Yes me too!

learningtofly · 25 February 2011, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeJaye

Great choice! The 39mm model is getting more popular by the day! I got one a few days ago and love it!

That's it, rub it in

24 February 2011, 10:04 AM	#1
Capstone "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: USA Watch: me Roll Posts: 73	My thoughts on the 39 mm Explorer I am a newbie so take my comments accordingly. For the last month I have been debating the 36 mm vs 39 mm Explorer. Both watches are stunning. The 36 mm was probably more comfortable on my wrist; however, after trying it on several times at my AD it just did not have the same weighted feel as my late model DJ. The AD told me about the internal changes on the newer model; however, that is not what swayed me to the 39 mm. For me it really came down to the way the watch felt on my arm. The newer style bracelet just felt right to me. I must admit that the 39 mm dial is a little large for the minute hand, but it just does not bother me . One other note, I was surprised how different it felt to wind the Explorer compared to my DJ. I am not sure how to describe it, but the Explorer has a more substantial feel as you wind. Anyway, here are some pics...

24 February 2011, 11:10 AM	#4
karmatp "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Trevor Location: Arizona Posts: 5,740	The new Explorer is something special. The clasp is leaps and bounds better over the previous clasps, huge congrats on a great purchase. __________________ My grails:

24 February 2011, 11:15 AM	#5
Atomant "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Fernwood Posts: 3,455	I totally like the 39mm Exp too. Mght be my next Rolex beside the GMT IIC. __________________ 116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80

24 February 2011, 12:21 PM	#7
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK047 Posts: 34,460	Excellent shots, Capstone! I have the 114270 and I like enough that I can't justify having the 214270, but when one looks at the watch as a whole and not at a macro shot of the dial, the watch is winner. Ever since I first laid eyes on it at the AD, my prediction has been that this new Explorer will be more popular than any Explorer has ever been with the general public. WISes may look down on it for now, but I think that the new size fills a niche in the Rolex line-up and that new buyers who would have never looked twice at the 114270 will give the 214270 its fair share of attention and sales. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

24 February 2011, 04:07 PM	#12
synth19 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: USA Posts: 51	Congrats! I agree this watch is comfortable as they get. __________________ Explorer 39mm

24 February 2011, 10:08 AM	#2
Dan2010 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: South Carolina Watch: Panerai 914 Posts: 6,540	I like it. Picking up it's older brother.

24 February 2011, 11:02 AM	#3
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	I have handled the 39mm and really like it. It's a Rolex in it's purist form.

24 February 2011, 11:51 AM	#6
Route 66 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Steve Location: Burbank, CA Watch: 214270 Mark II Posts: 4,121	I have the 36mm model. I checked out the 39mm version and really liked it...to be honest, more than I wanted to. The only thing I didn't like about the 39mm model is that the black face doesn't seem to be as black as it is on my 36mm Explorer, but that wouldn't prevent me from owning the new one. As for some TRF members thinking that the hands are too small, I thought so too until I held one in my hand and compared it to my smaller Explorer I. I think the hands look fine just the way they are.

24 February 2011, 02:59 PM	#8
MikeJaye Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: London Posts: 675	Great choice! The 39mm model is getting more popular by the day! I got one a few days ago and love it!

24 February 2011, 03:43 PM	#9
Capstone "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: USA Watch: me Roll Posts: 73	Thanks for the reply's everyone. Grady, you make some very good points. MikeJaye, nice watch and good pic.

24 February 2011, 03:45 PM	#10
dligg72 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: california Posts: 138	I want one!

24 February 2011, 03:49 PM	#11
Bmonroy17 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: So-Cal Watch: your SIX Posts: 277	You know what kills me or at least my own personal struggle. I am looking to purchase my 4th rolie and the TRF power sellers sell the Exp. I 214270 and Milgauss for nearly the same price. Most of the time the Milgauss is cheaper. I am drawn to the 214270 but I know i am getting more watch buying the Milgauss. Right now the plan is to get a 114270 and the Milgauss

24 February 2011, 04:09 PM	#13
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,588	Great pics can make a big difference to the way it looks and the impression it creates. __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

24 February 2011, 05:59 PM	#14
2jabs "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Jon Location: London Watch: 214270 Posts: 147	Congrats! I love my 214270! Enjoy! __________________ XROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXR LOREREXPLOREREXPLORERE

24 February 2011, 07:10 PM	#16
Singslinger "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: singapore Posts: 6,424	Nice photos - congrats!

24 February 2011, 08:41 PM	#17
Boadicea Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Daniel Location: UK Posts: 520	Very nice! Congratulations! As much as I don't like the hands, I have to admit that the new model is a big improvement on the old one.

24 February 2011, 09:59 PM	#18
Otto 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Japan Watch: Daytona and others Posts: 3,023	Congratulations! To me, the new Explorer is the perfect blend of the new and the classic.

24 February 2011, 10:57 PM	#19
phelix_da_kat "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: UK Watch: 16520 Posts: 351	I love the feel and look of the 39mm.. and especially the dial and the better clasp. Actually don't mind the hands. But I still prefer the small 36mm diameter as it's a better fit for me.

24 February 2011, 11:15 PM	#20
TheDude "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: DC Area, USA Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660 Posts: 4,492	Your pics are some of the best I have seen so far. I have tried on the 39mm a few times and i like it.

24 February 2011, 11:18 PM	#21
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	Shorter hands or not, that watch is real beauty! Congratulations on improved classic! __________________ My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/

25 February 2011, 02:01 AM	#23
SteKos Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 150	I tried one on recently, and I love the balance of the new 39mm. With the new bracelet and clasp, it feels like a tool watch that can/should be taken up to the the 7 peaks. Unfortunately, after I have to agree with the "short handers", I really do think they should have re-sized the hands properly for the new dial.

25 February 2011, 06:43 AM	#24
smurfolino "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Croatia Posts: 17	The balance is perfect. I have mine for 5 months now, I tried several expensive watches since and putting my Explorer I back on the wrist was such a perfect feeling, just like the first time:-) Tried leather and NATO, but...nooo, SS is just what this piece needs to be complete. And the clasp is something else comparing to old clasps, they are so tiny and light. Guy at the Rolex store was very surprised about the clasp when he took my watch in his hands. They still did not get any Explorers 39mm yet

25 February 2011, 06:46 AM	#25
Explorer 2011 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Kris Location: ENGLAND Watch: Searching Posts: 1,038	Great watch! Excellent choice __________________ __________________ ROLEX Explorer 214270 "Nil Satis Nisi Optimum..."

25 February 2011, 07:05 AM	#26
Rob_b "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Brisbane AUS Watch: SeaDweller Posts: 850	I keep coming back to check the pic's I'm going to check one out at my AD, I think I likey, likey a lot __________________ Travelling Through Time at The Speed of Life.

25 February 2011, 07:51 AM	#28
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,997	Its the plainess of the new Explorer that makes it very appealing. The fact the hands are odd would not be a deal breaker for me,as i think it's a cracking watch.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)