Used Sea-Dweller Deepsea v Sea-Dweller 16660

[oceandweller]

Hi

After selling off all my watches (low-end ones), I may have just enough money to buy either, a used Model reference 116660 Sea-Dweller Deepsea or a used excellent condition, Model reference 16660 Sea-Dweller with a matte tritium dial, since both of them will be of the same price, approximately.

Which of the two, should I buy for daily wear and also investment potential, for a period of at least 5 years from now?

Thank you.

[Jannal]

16660

[fc3s2k]

Originally Posted by Jannal

16660

X2 for sure!!!!

[superb]

Same here. 16660 is a transition model from 1665 to 116660.

[SWIMPRUF]

Originally Posted by Jannal

16660

FTW!

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by Jannal

16660

Hi

Thanks for the response.

Is there any chance you can let me know, as to the reasons why you think, the 16660 is a better buy than a 116660 for my purpose?

Thank you.

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by fc3s2k

X2 for sure!!!!

Hi

Thanks for your response.

Kindly let me know your reasons, for supporting the view of the other member.

Thank you.

[Rolex116520]

Originally Posted by superb

Same here. 16660 is a transition model from 1665 to 116660.

That's quite another way of looking at it ...

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by superb

Same here. 16660 is a transition model from 1665 to 116660.

Hi

Thanks for the response.

It is nice to learn, so far the opinion is the 16660 is more appropriate for my purpose. What do you think of the 1665 against the 16660 and also, the 116660?

Thank you.

[Rolex116520]

They are completely different watches , maybe you should try them both on before deciding . DSSD at an AD is easy enough to find , a 16600 may be different story .
I have a DSSD and love it , but if I had the opportunity and especially the money I'd buy a 16600 as well .

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by SWIMPRUF

FTW!

Hi

Thanks for the response.

It is good to learn, you share the opinion of the rest.

Is there any chance you can let me know, the reason?

Thank you.

[Rolex116520]

Originally Posted by oceandweller

Hi

Thanks for the response.

It is nice to learn, so far the opinion is the 16660 is more appropriate for my purpose. What do you think of the 1665 against the 16660 and also, the 116660?

Thank you.

Well .. the 1665 is a whole different kettle of fish . You are looking at one of the most sought after vintage models . A pristine condition 1665 depending on age and dial variant will cost you more than the 2 others combined .

[George Ab]

I've owned both and sold both. However, I bought back the best example of a 16660 I could get. The 116660 is just too top heavy for my taste. I need comfort in a watch. If it was a mere 3-4mm less tall, it would be a great watch.

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by Rolex116520

They are completely different watches , maybe you should try them both on before deciding . DSSD at an AD is easy enough to find , a 16600 may be different story .
I have a DSSD and love it , but if I had the opportunity and especially the money I'd buy a 16600 as well .

Hi

Thanks for the response.

For someone who has not owned a Rolex watch, it is always a dream to own one.

I hate to try anyone of them because the one I try first will surely not leave my wrist, since to me, both of them are great. I would rather ask first, before making up my mind.

Thank you.

[Clay]

Another option would be a Great White 1665.......

Less then the Double Red but more then the triple six......

If not, then the 666 by a mile.....

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by George Ab

I've owned both and sold both. However, I bought back the best example of a 16660 I could get. The 116660 is just too top heavy for my taste. I need comfort in a watch. If it was a mere 3-4mm less tall, it would be a great watch.

Hi

Thanks for your response.

Little wonder, those who have responded suggested the 16660, instead.

Since you have owned both and sold both of them and you said that you 'bought back the best example of a 16660'. What is the difference between the current one you have against that of the previous 16660?

Thank you.

[Andad]

16660 without a doubt.
The DSSD IMO would be great for a day every now and then or as a weekender but I couldn't wear something that high as an everyday wearer.
The SD I can wear every day easy. The SD's are hard to find new so buy the best one you can find for the best price.

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by Rolex116520

Well .. the 1665 is a whole different kettle of fish . You are looking at one of the most sought after vintage models . A pristine condition 1665 depending on age and dial variant will cost you more than the 2 others combined .

Hi

Thanks.

What makes the 1665 to be so sought-after, compared to the other two, 16660 and 116660?

Thank you.

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by Clay

Another option would be a Great White 1665.......

Less then the Double Red but more then the triple six......

If not, then the 666 by a mile.....

Hi

Thanks for the response and also, the picture of the beauty.

Is it a 1665 or a 16660 and what is the difference between the two, apart from the price, according to one respectable member of this forum?

Thank you.

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by Rolex116520

That's quite another way of looking at it ...

Hi

Thanks.

You will have to understand, since any Rolex is always a Rolex and it is difficult to part with it, once it is there sitting on the wrist.

Thank you.

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by directioneng

16660 without a doubt.
The DSSD IMO would be great for a day every now and then or as a weekender but I couldn't wear something that high as an everyday wearer.
The SD I can wear every day easy. The SD's are hard to find new so buy the best one you can find for the best price.

Hi

Thanks for the response.

I agree with you, the 116660 is like having a skyscraper on your wrist.

However, with my limited amount of funds that I may have eventually, it would be lucky to get a 16660 in reasonable condition, since the best one will not come cheap, in view of the competition.

Thank you.

[Jannal]

Originally Posted by oceandweller

Hi

Thanks for the response.

Is there any chance you can let me know, as to the reasons why you think, the 16660 is a better buy than a 116660 for my purpose?

Thank you.

Daily Wear: Deepsea is too big and heavy. I sold mine because of this reason.

Investment: Discontinued (sport watches) will appreciate in value more so than models that are still in production.

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by Jannal

Daily Wear: Deepsea is too big and heavy. I sold mine because of this reason.

Investment: Discontinued (sport watches) will appreciate in value more so than models that are still in production.

Hi

Thanks for your opinion which I appreciate.

That being the reason, I now understand as to the reason, why the 1665 is very much sought-after (despite the three hands are not in white-gold, I was advised) compared to the 16660 with a matte tritium dial.

I agree, the Deepsea is currently available and that being the reason, it is not as scarce as the other two models (1665 and 16660).

I thank all members for their sound opinion and good advice and based on this, I shall start hunting for a 16660, though from the tone of members, it will be some while, before I would come face to face with a reasonably good example.

Thank you.

[nauticajoe]

Another vote for the 16660.

[Caraptor]

My vote goes to 16660. The Deepsea is a very thick watch, and honestly, I don't think it makes as good a daily wearer as the easier to manage 16660. I don't think you should look at a watch from an investment standpoint (if you'll wear it, it's a good investment), but if forced to choose I'd say the 16660 will do better in the long run. It's a classic.

[psv]

It all depends how you'll use the watch. I'd argue the new SubC is a "better" all around watch than either of the mentioned. Furthermore, I'd pick a regular 16600 SD over the tripple-6 because it will have better lume, ergo more functional. Really, there is nothing "that special" about the 16660 IMO, it is a transitional model, so what? I guess if you want something that is a bit more rare... I'd pick a mint late model 16600 with all box/papers and get a watch that you can use/keep for life.

Just my 2 cents.

[gregmoeck]

I would pick up 16600 SD, I just got one and its a good watch. It's tight, thats the best word to describe it.

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by Caraptor

My vote goes to 16660. The Deepsea is a very thick watch, and honestly, I don't think it makes as good a daily wearer as the easier to manage 16660. I don't think you should look at a watch from an investment standpoint (if you'll wear it, it's a good investment), but if forced to choose I'd say the 16660 will do better in the long run. It's a classic.

Hi

Thanks for the response and advice.

Apparently, the result is all for and none against the 16660. All the great minds think alike.

I can only wear this watch for five years, unfortunately. After this time, I may have to sell it, so that I can make use of the funds for a down-payment to buy a small unit.

Some friends suggested that I should spend the money on stocks and shares, instead. I would rather spend it on a holiday, since at the end of the day, it is going to be the same, I will end up with nothing.

As far as I know, no one can manipulate the value of a vintage Rolex watch, unlike stocks and shares - one day up and the next day, with the press of a button, it is tsunami. Generally, many have got their fingers burnt with stocks and shares but not with a desirable vintage Rolex. Its value is based on supply and demand, rather than the whims and fancies of invincible elements. Of course, this is my personal opinion.

Thank you.

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by psv

It all depends how you'll use the watch. I'd argue the new SubC is a "better" all around watch than either of the mentioned. Furthermore, I'd pick a regular 16600 SD over the tripple-6 because it will have better lume, ergo more functional. Really, there is nothing "that special" about the 16660 IMO, it is a transitional model, so what? I guess if you want something that is a bit more rare... I'd pick a mint late model 16600 with all box/papers and get a watch that you can use/keep for life.

Just my 2 cents.

Hi

Thanks for the response.

I would prefer something that is older because I do not intend to keep it for a long time, since after five years, I intend to sell and use the funds, as a small down-payment to buy a unit.

Of course, I have to agree the newer ones come with various improvements and more practical for everyday wear. The fact I can get to wear a Rolex for five years is a dream come true. But, but, but, provided I can sell all my low-end watches at a reasonably good price. Otherwise, the dream will become a night-mare.

Thank you.

[oceandweller]

Originally Posted by gregmoeck

I would pick up 16600 SD, I just got one and its a good watch. It's tight, thats the best word to describe it.

Hi

Thanks for the response and the advice.

Needless to say, all Rolex sports are good but I would rather wear something a little older and hope, the investment potential over a short period of time will be better than the newer ones.

I have seen the 16600, it is just lovely and it would be difficult for me to part with it, when the time comes. I am also worried about the 'Rolex infectious disease' - one is never enough. It is contagious and the collectors in this forum can confirm this.

Thank you.